Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'legislation'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • USING THIS FORUM
    • Report A Problem
    • Forum User Guides
  • MAIN TOPICS
    • Why Not Say Hello....
    • All Things Model Flying
    • Beginners
    • IC Engines
    • Scale Matters
    • Gadgets and Electronics
    • Flying Field Reports and Chat
    • Modelling Money Savers...
    • Electric Ducted Fan
    • Jets and Turbines
    • Model Engineering and Accessories
    • In The Air
    • Incident Reports
    • Flying Sites and Clubs
    • Hints and Tips
    • Aerial Photography, First Person View, UAVs
    • Simulators
    • R/C Retailers / Distributors / Manufacturers
    • The Video Channel
  • GOING PLACES
    • Shows, Club Events and Competitions
    • Going Places
  • MARKETPLACE
    • FOR SALE
    • WANTED
  • ROTARY WING
    • Helicopters
    • Multi-Rotor
    • Autogyros
  • ELECTRIC FLIGHT
    • Electric Flight for Beginners
    • General Electric Flight Chat
    • Motor Discussion
    • Batteries and Chargers
    • Power System Selection
    • ESCs (Speed Controllers)
    • Propeller Selection
  • KITS
    • Scale and Semi-Scale kits
    • Sport, Aerobatic and 3D kits
    • Traditional kits
    • Warbird kits
    • Trainer kits
    • Indoor Models, Ultra Micros and Small Park Flyers
    • Foam models
  • GLIDERS AND GLIDING
    • Gliders and Gliding - General Discussion
    • Slope Soaring and Dynamic Soaring
    • Flat Field Gliding
    • Scale Gliders and Aerotowing
  • RADIO GEAR
    • General Radio Discussion
    • FrSky
    • Futaba
    • Spektrum/JR
    • Other Radio Brands
  • VINTAGE
    • General Vintage R/C Chatter
    • Vintage Kits, Semi-Kits and Plan Projects
    • Single-Channel R/C
  • THE WORKSHOP
    • RCM&E Plan Builders
    • Build Blogs and Kit Reviews
    • Building from Traditional Kits and Plans
    • 3D Printing
    • Own Design Project Blogs
    • Peter Miller plan builders
    • Tony Nijhuis plan builders
    • Chip Shop
    • Hawker Fury Mk 1 - RAF's Finest Biplane!
  • MASS BUILDS
    • The 2024 Forum Mass Build
    • The 2023 Forum Mass Build
    • The 2022 Forum Mass Build
    • The 2020 Mini Jet Mass Build
    • The 2019 RCM&E Fly-in Mass Build
    • The 2018 Mass Build
    • The 2017 Mass Build
    • The 2016 Ballerina Mass Build
    • The 2015 Mass Build
    • The 2014 Mass Build
    • The 2013 Tucano Mass Build
    • The 2012 Vintage Mass Build
    • The 2011 Webbit Mass Build
  • POWER SCALE SOARING ASSOCIATION (PSSA)
    • PSSA General Chat
    • PSS Build Blogs
    • PSSA Mass Build 2020 - North American F-86 Sabre
    • PSSA Mass Build 2018 - Hawker Hurricane
    • PSSA Mass Build 2016 - A4 Skyhawk
    • PSSA Mass Build 2014 - Jet Provost
  • UK CLASSIC AEROBATIC ASSOCIATION (UKCAA)
    • Classic Aerobat Build Blogs
    • UKCAA Events
    • UKCAA Chat
  • MODEL FLYING POLLS
    • Model Flying Polls
  • ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING!
    • RCM&E Magazine
    • Chit-chat
    • Photography
    • Full Size Aviation
    • eBay Watchers
    • Book Club

Blogs

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me

Found 1 result

  1. Sorry all, but there is another regulation story emerging that we all should be keeping an eye on, as it could influence what happens in the UK and Europe in the coming years... A major legal hurdle for the FAA's remote ID deployment in the US has been passed - the sources below explain the background to the RaceDayQuads vs. FAA lawsuit and how the judges ruled, though apparently there could still be an appeal... https://dronedj.com/2022/07/29/faa-remote-id-drone-rule/ https://insideunmannedsystems.com/faa-just-won-the-remote-id-casethank-you-next/ If we assume this is not successfully appealed (by far the most likely outcome), this gives the US modelling industry (including HH with their many RTF and BNF products) and part 107 operators who derive income from model flying (including aeromodelling Youtube reviewers) with some major issues... All RTF/BNF (and possibly even ARTF - that requires clarification) models >250g are supposed to have remote ID fitted as standard by Sept 16th in order to be legally sold. DJI say they can do it via software updates, but for everything else on shelves and in the supply chain that is clearly impossible in the timescale, especially as it appears the full specs of how remote ID must be technically implemented have not been published by the FAA. Part 107 (commercial) operators appear to need "standard" remote ID fitted to everything they make (even scratchbuilts and <250g models) because the way the rules are worded means that the exceptions for homebuilt models don't seem to apply to commercial operators. So what does this all mean? Bruce (of course) has a view... Hold your nose 😉 and watch this 12 min video, as it is a bit more accessible than reading the 470 page Remote ID regulations in full...! I know Bruce is a marmite character for many and prone to hyperbolae. In this case I doubt the shelves will become bare overnight (comments against that video indicate the rule applies to products manufactured after Sept 16th, not those already in the supply chain), but there are undoubtedly some worrying signs here. If Remote ID is pushed ahead this quickly in the US without specs being fully defined and with manufacturers and pilots unprepared, it could criminalise both vendors and pilots at a grand scale overnight. It could also turn the heads of politicicians in the UK and Europe to accelerate their Remote ID legislation. I don't have enough information to know if his pointed views on the AMA are valid, but looking at the AMA site today it is surprisngly absent of content on the upcoming regulation changes. A bit of further googling did dig up this blog which has their view on the latest announcements - it appears they agree with Bruce and see a delay as likely given the amount of missing information on how this will actually be implemented from the FAA. Even so, it does appear the BMFA, FPV UK etc have clearly been more active than them in defending our corner to the authorities for which we should all be thankful. Let's hope they continue to be successful in the future as the pressure from authorities inevitably increases...
×
×
  • Create New...