Jump to content

Canberra by Andy Blackburn PSS


Peter Garsden
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thought I would show you the pilots which arrived this morning from Sean at Real Model Pilots. What a deal. I ordered one and he sent 2 - one he made specially for Andy and one of his standard items. Question is, did the Canberra have 2 pilots? There looks to be enough space for 2? Any offers from you geeky types?

20180307_195715.jpg

I also thought i would show you the canopy and bomb aimers canopy or whatever it is called. I don't need the bomb aimer's bit because of the version I am making. above. So it is going spare if anyone wants it. Vortex Vacforms supply both items. If you want me to send it I still have the box which the pilot's came in which will work fine. No cost or P&P, consider it a gift to the needy? PM me.

20180307_200013.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Andy Blackburn on 04/03/2018 12:31:12:

OK, so bearing in mind previous discussions about trusting the parts and paper plans expanding and contracting with atmospheric conditions, either the plan or the parts could be at fault (although I suspect the plan, as previously discussed).

I know the original parts were OK (see the original build thread) and Sarik have seen these, so they'd have to be going some to get it wrong, although it depends how they've managed the process and I can think of a couple of ways that errors might creep in.

Can you please measure the gaps between the ribs on the mainspar for me? The correct distances (i.e. as designed) between ribs on the plan are :

R4-R5 : 59.96 mm

R5-R6 : 60.79 mm

R6-R7 : 60.79 mm

R7-R8 : 60.79 mm

R8-R9 : 60.00 mm

(note that the V-shaped laser burn will make the slots a little bigger. And I'm obviously not expecting you to measure to a hundredth of a mm!)

If it turns out that the parts are correct, you can add a bit of wood to the bottom skin (nobody will know). If it turns out that the parts are wrong, I'll talk to Sarik on your behalf...

rgds

A.

Bit difficult to measure the finished wing Andy and the parts are already installed with filler pieces installed, but doing the best I can using my micrometer

R4-R5 - 57.65mm

R5- R6 62.5mm

R6 - R7 65.93

R7 - R8 64.59

R8 - R9 60.32

As I say this is a guesstimate as I have filled in the gaps now and chopped the end off.

Looking at the plan the gaps between the main spar ribs are all the same - 59.40

The gaps shown on the outer sub spar as drawn on the plan however are all 61.28mm

So the gaps on the plan part main spar R4 to R9 are all 60mm or thereabouts.

So I think that the part has not been cut out according to the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Andy Blackburn on 04/03/2018 12:31:12:

OK, so bearing in mind previous discussions about trusting the parts and paper plans expanding and contracting with atmospheric conditions, either the plan or the parts could be at fault (although I suspect the plan, as previously discussed).

I know the original parts were OK (see the original build thread) and Sarik have seen these, so they'd have to be going some to get it wrong, although it depends how they've managed the process and I can think of a couple of ways that errors might creep in.

Can you please measure the gaps between the ribs on the mainspar for me? The correct distances (i.e. as designed) between ribs on the plan are :

R4-R5 : 59.96 mm

R5-R6 : 60.79 mm

R6-R7 : 60.79 mm

R7-R8 : 60.79 mm

R8-R9 : 60.00 mm

(note that the V-shaped laser burn will make the slots a little bigger. And I'm obviously not expecting you to measure to a hundredth of a mm!)

If it turns out that the parts are correct, you can add a bit of wood to the bottom skin (nobody will know). If it turns out that the parts are wrong, I'll talk to Sarik on your behalf...

rgds

A.

Bit difficult to measure the finished wing Andy and the parts are already installed with filler pieces installed, but doing the best I can using my micrometer

R4-R5 - 57.65mm

R5- R6 62.5mm

R6 - R7 65.93

R7 - R8 64.59

R8 - R9 60.32

As I say this is a guesstimate as I have filled in the gaps now and chopped the end off.

Looking at the plan the gaps between the main spar ribs are all the same - 59.40

The gaps shown on the outer sub spar as drawn on the plan however are all 61.28mm

So the gaps on the plan part main spar R4 to R9 are all 60mm or thereabouts.

So I think that the part has not been cut out according to the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking of retaining the wings using a handy wing joiner which I bought from Top Models in Czechoslovakia - problem is that it didn't come with any instructions, but I think I have worked it out. Couldn't find the same product on the site again.

Methinks I will have to build up some depth in the built up wing to hold the female screw fitting, and the same in the fuselage. Question is should I use balsa or ply or both - I think both maybe. You don't want it to rip out on a heavy landing, but the plastic screw has to bind on something soft?

20180310_082008.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe most "bubble canopy" Canberras had two seats at the front. The pilot's Martin Baker armchair plus, to his right, a foldable "Rumbold" (Google it) non-ejection seat for use by brave men. Two occupants would therefore not necessarily be incorrect. Twin MB's on the T4 accepted of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have put the top sheeting on now, and have cut the leading edge strips. I used Aliphatic Resin for both the top sheeting, and the leading edge as well as gluing the wing tips together - 2 pieces of 1/4" tops, a laminate of 1/32" ply then a 1/8" bottom sandwich - all parts supplied in the wood pack

Masking tape is so useful. I will used it to line the joint when dry to stop the plane scoring the top sheeting.

20180313_081213.jpg

20180313_081154.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thought I would show you

  1. The washout wedges spot and tack cyano glued to the bottom of the wing as otherwise they wander off line when putting the wing down and pinning it to bench in position.
  2. The aileron line - one marks this by piercing the bottom skin on the join with pin pricks, then join up the pin holes with a pencil mark, so when cutting it out, I will use a fine toothed saw through both top and bottom skins

20180313_072654.jpg

Also, trimming off the end of the top sheeting and making a clean cut is difficult - I use the adjustable blade knife from my DIY box, which has break off blades and is very handy for heavy duty work.

20180313_073305.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Peter Garsden on 11/03/2018 21:19:11:

The carbon connector rod was loose in the wing tube so Andy suggested I apply to coats of epoxy to create a larger circumference.and make it tighter in the tube.

I mixed some microballoons with some epoxy and applied two coats. It is still not very tight but better.

20180311_192913.jpg

I've always used a layer of masking tape to solve this one.

If a single wrap of tape is too much, then try using it on half of the joiner rod.

Works for me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night I stuck on the wing tips (incidentally you need a right and a left wing tip as it is a 1/8 balsa 1/32 ply 1/2 balsa sandwich starting from the bottom, so don't make 2 right had version like what I did and have to almost start again), and the 1/64 ply root facings with epoxy.

With hindsight I should have used Aliphatic Resin for the wing root which grabs a lot better. Even using 20 minute epoxy it was starting to go off by the time I glued on the final wing root facing.

20180314_222235.jpg

In the above picture you can see the 1/16 ply insert to hold the bolts for the Aileron horn, which is good and solid

20180314_222217.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so to the nacelles. It took me a while to figure how out how it all went together as there are many parts very cleverly designed with tabs, the CNC cutting very accurate. Andy - note to self - mark the plan with the part numbers shown. I think it would be easy to do. There is, however a sequence of drawings showing which order parts go together with details of the curving of the outer sheeting. There is a keel running top and bottom of the wing with formers at right angles number N1 to N10.

I decided to support the wing on blocks of foam as the keel underneath, otherwise applying pressure might crush the delicate structure

I decided to try alihphatic glue which is a wicking alternative to cyano. Less fumes but one has to pin it in position as it doesn't grab and set fast like cyano. It does,however, dry in about 15 minutes. Warning, however, it doesn't sand at all.

20180317_120717.jpg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yesterday, I had an inert dispirited day trying to make the 3/32" curved 3D covers for the Nacelles. I made 2 paper patterns for one quadrant, and 2 attempts at a balsa shroud, neither of which worked. Andy I think I need some help here.

In the previous thread I said aliphatic glue - don't mean that I meant Super Phatic, sorry.

I read the instructions copiously, cut out a large sheet of paper to form my paper pattern, and laid it over the structure. I think the problem is that paper is too flexible. At the front, the sheet has to twist slightly to get over the front curve of the wing and down the side of the nacelle.

I marked top and bottom of the pattern on the paper and cut it out. I transferred it to balsa and it wouldn't fit. I tried again, and made another Horlicks of it. I gave up and watched the TV instead, disgruntled, and that was after cleaning the house as the trouble n strife is away, so I must be desperate!

My plan going forward is:-

  1. Use a cardboard template instead of paper.
  2. Use the wing root 1/16 ply rib I have made to mark off the top profile of the wing section and transfer that to cardboard
  3. Andy, you talked about cutting "darts" in the template, but I didn't understand what you meant. Can't remember if that is in the article from RCM&E or the building blog.
  4. I didn't even get onto the hot water soak, and rounding off with thumb nails at all.

This is probably the most difficult piece of building I have done so far - never shy away from a challenge though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Andy I think I need some help here.

Sorry to hear that you've been having some issues with the nacelles - it is reasonably straightforward once you know the correct technique, which I've detailed in a separate thread:

**LINK**

This shows the step-by-step process, and it doesn't take long to get a reasonable pattern. Let me know if it works for you or not and I'll amend the thread as appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just goes to show that a bit of good instruction and tips goes a long way. Last night I followed Andy's guidance, and heh presto it worked. What I wasn't doing is marking the outline several times and sticking the pattern to the wing. Still wasn't easy, but much easier.

I found the soaking of the wood with hot water really effective. I used cryano as suggested which didn't mind wet wood. Now I have to steam and bend a piece of 3/16 balsa which will be a challenge

20180319_225438.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...