Jump to content

3001 available ?


J D 8
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jon - Laser Engines said:

if those specs are right then 12 quid is pretty good for a 4.5kg digital servo. Still, its double the price of the old 148 and stuff so thats not ideal for those who just need a bog stock servo

By the look of it just a plain bearing, non ball race output on the U-300. Need to pay £22 or so now for a ballraced servo U-301 with stuff included that I don't need and won't be of any use with other manufacturers RXs as far as I'm aware. Not the end of the world with so many alternatives, but it just makes life that little bit more difficult and more expensive than a while ago compared  with the perfectly adequate 3001s.

Edited by Cuban8
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cuban8 said:

By the look of it just a plain bearing, non ball race output on the U-300. Need to pay £22 or so now for a ballraced servo U-301 with stuff included that I don't need and won't be of any use with other manufacturers RXs as far as I'm aware. Not the end of the world with so many alternatives, but it just makes life that little bit more difficult and more expensive than a while ago compared  with the perfectly adequate 3001s.

At least the U-301 is rated up to 8.4V compared to the U-300's 6V. I just dont trust very cheap servos of unknown brand for use in a decent model. The extra cost of making the U-300 a ball raced servo must be tiny so I can only assume it's a marketing ploy to get us to double our servo costs where a ball race servo is required instead of just putting a quid or so on the price of a U-300. Will need some thought but not a good move by Futaba IMHO.

Edited by Cuban8
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

                        Have to agree with you with about the so called up grade U301, for most many unwanted features [ just like this laptop I am on ] at extra cost when 3001's were the bee's.

 When I was getting well into rc some time ago our club expert was a chap called Brian who built and flew some lovely large [ at that time ] models. When I asked him what servo's he said 3001's for everything, even his large Beech 18 with twin Zenoah's, just more of them. Good enough for Brian then good enough for me I thought.

  Checked out Kamtec but they use Hermes :classic_sad: who seam to be totally unable to deliver in my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                 I have had a fair look around with nothing found. I have for now decided to do what they do for the US president's helicopter in taking proven parts from other aircraft, other models in my case.:classic_biggrin:

Edited by J D 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been looking around since yesterday and yes, the Savox products look to fit the bill and are a known high quality brand with a broad range of products for varied applications.

I'm as guilty as anyone, but I do think we sometimes overspecify our servos, especially on models that aren't what you might call 'high performance' and with care, physically smaller servos (very often just as powerful or more so as the much larger types that were the norm years ago) will be perfectly adequate and up to the task. I'm thinking mainly on elevators and ailerons, where on non-3D sport and some scale models, not very much deflection is required and aerodynamic loading will be minimal. Horses for courses, hence correct choices will have to be made, but a physically smaller and less heavy 2.5Kg (5.5 lbs!) torque metal gear, ball raced servo might be just as well suited in some applications where the physically larger and heavier 3001 std style was the original go to solution- mainly because that's always what we used!

 

Edited by Cuban8
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much of what we do is over spec. Excessively large engines, over powered servos, massive batteries etc. 

 

On the one hand its not a problem as everything will be running well within its ability so failures are in theory less prone. But, the added complexity can lead to its own problems and failures. Its also a waste of money. 

 

Manufacturers also like to flog you more expensive stuff you dont actually need. Reading the blurb on the savox 351 they state its good for park fly and throttle...now, if you need a 4kg digital servo to move your throttle then something is wrong with it. As for park fly, would you not use a 9g servo and not a hunking great thing? Seems a bit off to me and i use a number of 351's on my 50cc class warbirds without issue. 

 

As has already been stated though, i would rather take lower spec servo from a reputable brand than a theoretically higher spec servo from some random brand i had never heard of. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

             In days gone by a 148 would do both ailerons even on quite large models. My Major Mannock is still this way with an old Fleet FPS-17 moving the barn doors, today it is common for an aileron to have one servo to its self.

          Servos are for the Bristol F2b [ now mine] I am fixing up, original in it are 148's One is duff and signs of corrosion on others have them condemned to spares.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Repeat warning ! Whatever you do DONT buy cheap Futaba servos from the inter - Bay. They will more than likely be dangerous fakes. Just checked and they are still for sale, 4 servos for £ 12 to £14 . That's £12 to £14 wasted and are just rubbish. The old saying " If it looks too good to be true it usually is " has never been more relevant. These might  be OK for a bird scarer or something but not for model aircraft.  They seemed to have removed the Futaba name but have kept the number "S 3003" .

These have appeared at our club three times now despite warnings and have quickly been despatched to a bin.

Edited by Engine Doctor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...