Jump to content

Quadcopter idiot


cymaz
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you're not breaking the law when flying, how are you being penalised? The BMFA have done an outstanding job of putting our side forward and ensuring a positive, light regulatory touch that takes account of advances in the technology and leaves us free to fly in peace. 

 

No politician wants a drone law named after them, they'd far rather be remembered for something that permeates the public conciousness or becomes a work of grand infrastructure. 

 

Idiots will always be idiots, regardless of legislation, the method of idiocy is irrelevant. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Lima Hotel Foxtrot said:

If you're not breaking the law when flying, how are you being penalised? The BMFA have done an outstanding job of putting our side forward and ensuring a positive, light regulatory touch that takes account of advances in the technology and leaves us free to fly in peace. 

 

No politician wants a drone law named after them, they'd far rather be remembered for something that permeates the public conciousness or becomes a work of grand infrastructure. 

 

Idiots will always be idiots, regardless of legislation, the method of idiocy is irrelevant. 

"how are you being penalised?"    Ten years ago there were no laws here so you could fly anything anywhere !,   accidents were a thing that happened in model clubs, now we are penalised " leaves us free to fly in peace. "   "as you can only fly in a club and have to pass a test and register your flying stuff,,,

 

"No politician wants a drone law named after them, "        oh come on not one death from a model rc drone world wide and so many laws,,,

 

 

"Idiots will always be idiots, regardless of legislation,"   yes you said it so why do you account for all of these laws ?.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry mate, I can think (know) how a drone an be dangerous. Perhaps I’m not the first.

10 years ago, I could get the feel ( couldn't be be bothered to find out) how a drone can be dangerous.

Don't blame politicians here. 
 

Toy planes are just a casualty in a definition process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

"how are you being penalised?"    Ten years ago there were no laws here so you could fly anything anywhere !,   accidents were a thing that happened in model clubs, now we are penalised " leaves us free to fly in peace. "   "as you can only fly in a club and have to pass a test and register your flying stuff,,,

 

That is a specious argument. By your own logic you state laws that have no material effect on you are a form of penalising you, but you fail to state how you are being penalised.

 

If you're getting miffed over what is to all intents and purposes a sensible addendum to the ANO regarding how club based UAV operators operate legally within UK airspace which, to repeat myself, makes absolutely no material difference to how you were previously flying, then I suggest you leave your club and fly freely in the countryside like some sort of aeromodelling warrior for how things used to be back in the good old days. If you don't bother anyone, nobody will bother you. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, David Davis 2 said:

In France you have to register ever aircraft you fly but there is no charge and you have to fly from an approved flying field. I don't know how slope soarers manage because I'm only really interested in powered models..

Our local soaring site has been registered on the NOTAMS for years and has been included as a legal site,,

and now even my garden is limited to a 50 metre height restriction,,,?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

lhf, didn't you read my post,  I CAN'T FLY ANYWHERE EXCEPT ON A FFAM MODEL FIELD WITH A REGISTERED NUMBER AND TAKING A TEST TO GET IT,,, 

 

 can you read that ?.

Oh, how silly of me, not having my mind reading abilities turned on and therefore not knowing you are in a totally different country. Maybe you should have led with that fact, what with the incident under discussion happening in the UK. ALSO, I CAN SHOUT IN A POST TOO!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem that many of us have is not the bother or expense of paying a registration fee and answering a few multiple guess questions, but just what good and true benefit the legislation actually has and the genuine concern that those in power will get a taste for even more onerous changes as time goes on.

Yes, BMFA has done a great job in deflecting and moderating a great deal of the foolishness from those who came up with all this on the back of the falsehood of our skies becoming black with delivery drones (still waiting BTW), the commercialisation to a HUGE degree of the low airspace, or our countryside littered with full sized aircraft brought down by drones or model aircraft and not forgetting the rediculous and infamous Gatwick Airport 'Incident'.

Infringements of law will continue as we've seen only in the last few days and it strikes me that very little in the way of aprehending and prosecuting these people seems to meet with much success. Goodness knows how many people or events are pestered with nuisance drones or whatever, but either never report anything or if they do, it's just filed away and forgotten.

I've said before that I believe the regulations will eventually be watered down as their lack effectiveness is realised and I think we need to hold the legislators feet to the fire to encourage a much more hands off approach over the coming years.

We are where we are now and I accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Geoff S said:

I doubt if the regulations will be watered down due to their lack of efficacy but they will be largely ignored  by both the public and the police - as they are now by and large.

In part, I agree. However why would a piece of legislation that will in time be clearly shown to be redundant IMHO, be persisted with after being shown to be a bad and ineffective law?

£9 is not a lot of money to pay along with a bit of box ticking to abide by the law at the moment and get a 'rubber stamp' to fly legally, but don't expect it to stay that way - and for what?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't you think that the regs intoduced aren't to deter bona fide members of associations...who try to do what they have been told(most of the time)...... but are there to make someone think twice about buying a radio controlled model of whatever description .....bearing in mind all the stuff they need to do to fly lawfully? ...... instead of out of the box and fly....regardless.....and cause an accident/incident. 

 

as an aside,not long ago there was a theory that the regs were to clear the airways....and allow Drones to fly,here there and everywhere.......that seems to have gone quiet also......

 

 

i may be wrong of course.?

 

ken anderson...ne..1... regs dept. 

Edited by ken anderson.
added some more words of wisdom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...