Jump to content

..

Members
  • Posts

    971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by ..

  1. I agree it's all down to personal preference & the value of any expo dependent on the particular style of airframe.

    A tip for those new to the function is to set the transmitter on dual rates but rather than have the control surfaces moving at greater travel leave them equal and have two differing expo rates. Say 0 / 25% , this will then give a good inflight demonstration into how the function alters the flight characteristics of the model in an instance rather than reprogramming after a flight.

  2. Posted by Donald Fry on 28/11/2016 08:46:17:
    Posted by Justin K. on 28/11/2016 07:25:16:

    Plus or Minus expo is not a general term with radio it's brand specific to always best to check your manual. Futaba & Spectrum are opposite.

    I think they are not opposite. I am Spektrum now, used to be Futaba, and don't remember a chance when I swapped. Don't know about other brands.

    Yes they are.

  3. Posted by Denis Watkins on 15/01/2016 10:04:51:

    I would put a decent 52 OS Surpass on your model, making it most reliable and making the model flyable in skilled manner.

    A 70 fourstroke is about right in the acro wot Denis and is the power plant used when the magazine did a review a few years ago. It's not a light airframe and needs lead in the nose with a 70 so suggesting a 52 seems odd ? If I did another I too would use a 91 fourstroke.

  4. I think there ok for convenience BUT not an answer to a poorly running engine. I've got one in a P47 Thunderbolt but plan to remove it soon.

    The tuning of the engine is different to the settings on a motor started with a conventional glow starter, so all is ok until your onboard battery gets low and then you have a mistuned engine that's going to struggle to run anyway so I end up unconfident in the glow set up. It's like a bit of a vicious circle and after trials personally  I trust the well tuned motor rather than risking unknown battery capacity so it's a no from me. 

    Edited By Justin K. on 05/11/2016 18:36:08

    Edited By Justin K. on 05/11/2016 18:37:26

  5. No problem Craig , there are quite a few bits on YouTube so you may find one with eflites on there. Some say the Seagull version flys better so it may not be all bad. I like the Hangar 9 Razorback too and kick myself not getting one when Sussex models had them on a special.

  6. Craig , this guy on YouTube has fitted FMS aftermarket retracts into his so it looks possible? A google search on the dimensions of both those and yours would confirm.

    https://youtu.be/BSuGsDCF-qk

  7. Posted by Phil 9 on 05/11/2016 12:48:23:

    I have noted a few discontinued H9 products remerging as seagull

    Maybe someone can confirm my suspicion that the are the same models rebadged?

    No it's definitely not , totally different build configuration & a little smaller too.

    I've not seen any Hangar 9 products re badged as Seagull? What are you referring to Phil ?

  8. I have my pumped OS 120 mounted inverted & its a very neat set up.

    ASP / SC are just Chinese clones of the older OS 120, some swear by them , others at them. In my experience the general poor finish can lead to air leak problems. You pay your money & make your choice.

    Andover Models will do you a Saito 125 for around £240 , Fantastic performers I have one in a hangar 9 Sbach , would probably have to go in side mounted due to the tank position but they are very easy on the eye too.

  9. A 91 size fourstroke glow engine will struggle with both of the models mentioned, I have an OS120 fs in my Hangar 9 C Eagle. This is a great combination as recommended in the RCM&E review.

    If you want a fourstroke Pete then glow is the way to go, twostroke petrol being the alternative 

    Edited By Justin K. on 31/10/2016 10:01:46

  10.  

     

     

    Posted by cymaz on 22/10/2016 13:09:43:

    Bought this last year from Salisbury. Been working on it off and on since then. Its had new servos, battery redundancy, new linkages, modified exhaust, new tail wheel , new nav light system,dual aileron servos and all new linkages. Just the wings to get sprayed up and check the CG....

    The hole in the side of the fuselage was intentional as I needed access to get the closed loop and nav light wires in. It has a litho hatch that will be screwed in and painted white.

    mulligan decals 2.jpg

    mulligan decals 1.jpg

    Edited By cymaz on 22/10/2016 13:11:42

     

    Thats very nice indeed.

    Edited By Justin K. on 27/10/2016 07:30:40

×
×
  • Create New...