Dave Hopkin
-
Posts
3,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Calendar
Downloads
Posts posted by Dave Hopkin
-
-
Tshhhhh
Mrs BEB's project should have been diagonally double planked and nice stepped hull to go with that hard chine, that would get it to plane (and yes, that is a nautical term) nicely ..... course a couple more 600's either side of the one you have would help too.....
-
Its not an RC Submarine, I am just investigating the application of Lipo's for a new form of farmland ploughing
-
Hi Paul
As I have a few months off, I am going to the field during the week, as I am for the moment an "interesting liability" in the sky it's probably best I avoid the busier flying times!!!!
-
I wont claim to be anywhere near museum standard, in scale boats there are several classes for Scale models, from Class A (Exact Scale, where builders plans and full documentation must be provided) down to class C (for kits) - sounds like your member is in the Class A area... Me? lower echelons of class B!
I think the biggest challenge in building boaters will have is weight control, its simply not really an issue in boats, I have a 56" 1904 HMS Kent which when ballasted down to the correct waterline weighs in at 60lb!
-
Been lurking for a few months whilst preparing the ground with "she that thinks she must be obeyed" for a return to aeromodelling, yes I confess I was seduced away to RC model boats for a good few years, but I have done the Jeremy Kyle detox thing now and back and swapping 40mm brass props for 12" nylon ones.....
Joined a club (Rochdale Flyers) purchased an Apprentice and very slowly learning to fly the damm thing...... mind you still feels a bit weird NOT putting 4 or 5lb ballast into the thing........
BMFA insurance with modified transmitters
in All Things Model Flying
Posted
Reading the insurance operating with a modified rig would be covered - but if any investigation subsequently proved the mods to have been a direct contributor to the incident then the flyer might well find themselves facing charges of negligence in that the flyer "owed the plaintiff a duty of care" and the modifications formed a breach of that duty
So says STMBO who is in the legal trade