Jump to content

Peter Etherington 1

Members
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Peter Etherington 1

  1. Returning back to the hobby after a very long break and having aquired a SC46 I was wondering what fuel would suit this engine. Things have moved on a bit since I was flying. Peter

  2. I agree with this and it is sound advice but this aircraft isn`t going to be my only steed. As I said in an earlier post I have a high wing foamy and a electric foamy glider to be getting on with plus a Boddy Old bill. 

    • Like 2
  3. Been trawling the net and there`s not a lot out there but luckily found a Ben Buckle Buccaneer 66" span from Addlestone Models, so i`ve bought that. probably put a .35 or a .40 two stroke in it. Whoopee

    • Like 1
  4. May be a daft question but just wondering if anyone has made a successful custom exhaust for a 2 stroke engine. I was thinking of making one to see if I can make an engine quieter. ie. a couple of boxes. 

  5. Thanks Robin, I wasn`t planning to fly in winds, just want an old timer just to poodle around on a still day and I so enjoy the building process, good idea with the roof area in the shed. I will have to measure the car but I have a seven seater so I think I`ll be ok in that respect. It`s just deciding which one to go for. Peter

  6. Hi, Jon, the only reason I was thinking of a two piece wing is the storage factor when not flying. 80 odd inches of wing is quite a large thing to stash when you only have a 12ft x 10ft workshop. I also have a 8ft x 6ft shed but I couldn`t guarantee it`s safety in there as the wife and grandchildren use it. Peter

  7. Thanks Robin, I was looking at the larger models earlier. If I could build the wings in two parts it wouldn`t be a problem. There are quite a few second hand .60 engines out there at reasonable prices. That Powerhouse is lovely. The price of these bigger kits isn`t too bad considering the price of some of the bigger scale models out there. I know covering a bigger model is expensive but it is what it is. I build radio controlled scale ship models and I would think nothing of paying over a £100 for just a couple of motors, prop shafts, rudders and props. A hull will set me back well over another £100 and then the cost to build it, I think aeroplanes are not that more expensive. I cant think that a 88" (vintage) plane would be any harder to fly than a 60", or am I wrong? i`m sure someone will correct me. Peter

  8. I would like to take up flying again after a lapse of 39 years and i`m thinking of building a Ben Buckle kit. The two that have caught my eye are the Junior 60 and the Buccaneer. My question is which of the two would be best for me to fly (i`m a bit rusty). Building is not a problem for me. I want something just to stooge around the skies with. Peter

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...