Jump to content

Richard Wills 2

Members
  • Posts

    360
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Richard Wills 2

  1. 19 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

    Instructions for my one on the French site,, which is as you can see a British review published in the UK,

     

    https://www.miniplanes.fr/images/pdf/33045/notice_jp_4495120.pdf

     

     And here the Instructions also from the same shop on the 'new' one,,

     

    https://www.miniplanes.fr/images/pdf/522654/notice_sea116n.pdf

     

     What are your instructions like Richard ?.

    Other than mine was the version with mech retracts, exactly as those, mine was the earlier escale version.  can't see any difference other than the retracts.  IIRC I ended up at 130mm on the cg

  2. I had one until last year with an OS 91 surpass, perfect combination, flew fantastic.  The manual cg was extremely nose heavy though, it needed best part of 400g in the nose to balance as per manual and felt horrible.  Gradually removed it bit by bit until only 50g remained, and what a sweetie it was then.  

  3. 6 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

    5 litres 2% = 10 ml of oil,

    5 litres 3% = 15ml of oil,

    it's missing 5ml of oil

    5 litres at 50:1 is 98ml of oil

    5 litres at 30:1 is 161ml of oil

     

    Adding 60 ml will get you to near as needs be 30:1.  If it was me I would probably run it as it comes also.

     

  4. Lipos don't explode, they rapidly combust, there is a dfference. There's enough Lipo myth to frighten people without throwing explosions into the equaution:

    Gunpowder also does not explode it rapidly combusts. The explosion in a firecracker happens when the expanding gases are trapped by a container (cardboard casing) and the build up of pressure causes it to fail. Another reason to vent your box is the gases released by the failed lipo will displace the air in the box rapidly, once thats gone no oxygen remains and combustion cannot continue.

  5. But equally the Laser 180 will be beaten by the OS 120 two stroke. The Saito 180 twin previously mentioned seems to be particularly light. But it's not very powerful for its size. Twins, be they two stroke or four stroke, usually fall down on internal friction, especially at these small sizes. And even single cylinder four strokes are at a disadvantage. The OS 91 two stroke is close to double the power of their 91 four stroke. The heli engines are even better, throttle very well, and they only need the head turned down (if you want it cowled), plus a prop driver. There's one in a 'classic' pattern plane of mine.

    And as you also say the differences. won't be noticed much in the air.

    Edited By Richard Clark 2 on 30/07/2020 20:08:39

    The OS 91's will produce double the power of the 91 four stroke, only problem there is to get the hp you would need 15,000 rpm which means something like an 11x6 or 11x7 prop. Pretty useless thrust wise on anything larger than a 40 size aeroplane. On representative props 14" plus the difference is much less pronounced.

  6. C ratings are mostly very exaggerated, to the point of being complete lies. I once had a small foam pylon racer with a brand new 60c 2200 3s which going of the c rating should have given 132A. Voltage crashed at 65A. Other than a guide to a higher C rating being better than a lower one the numbers mean very little. A 30-40c pack I find is fine in most models.

    Edited By Richard Wills 2 on 14/12/2020 17:12:56

  7. The one major problem with MDS engines is that unlike an OS they don't run if the carb isn't set properly, an OS runs badly, the MDS just stops. I quite like them, no where near refined but I have several 'metal door stops' given to me because they never kept running for a whole flight which have been great reliable engines.

×
×
  • Create New...