Hello All,
A few disparate thoughts in relation to this thread, from a newish aero modeller living just west of London.
I currently have three fields available for me to fly, all public spaces. The cooperation of the public is essential to operate safely so when expressing 'injustice' about new regulations please do nothing that would make my relationship with the public difficult.
There are two other locations where I would like to fly, but both require an 'A' certificate. At my own club I need the 'A' to fly solo. My interest is primarily in gliders, and building my own planes. I am currently working on a powered sport model with undercarriage to practice for, and take, the 'A'. Not how I envisaged spending my time (and money). As alluded to above, the hobby has placed this barrier to my participation, not some outside agency.
The result is I do most of my flying (Hi-Start and electric launch) in an unmanaged space shared with pedestrains, dogs, horse riders, herds of roaming deer, plus a helicopter air lane directly overhead. It is actually the least fraught of the three locations, with the limitation that your timetable is set by what else is happening. I suspect the other users of the park would object strongly to commercial drone operations, so if this comes to the public's attention they can possibly help keep my access to low level air space.
I do not object to taking the 'A' test, but I do want to fly meanwhile when there is no club member available to assist. Maybe once a week, weather permitting, at a time the club chooses, is too limited.
Even when 'qualified' a club with exclusive use of a piece of private land is something I may never experience. Around here, restricted membership and prices too high.