Jump to content

Alan Gorham_

Members
  • Posts

    1,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Alan Gorham_

  1. He was actually enquiring about replacement parts for an ARTF Meteor kit, not details of the fullsize. 

     

    You often ask question on this forum without any evidence of you having used the vast resources of the internet to do a bit of prior research. People on here are extremely helpful, but if you just demand info from them, it's a bit of a one-way street.

  2. 4 minutes ago, Rich Griff said:

    Nice...

     

    Meteor enquiry....double sided trailing arm main undercarriage ?

     

    Not entirely clear in the meteor book I have...

     

    F8 , someone was enquiring...

     

    There is a wondrous invention called Google. It allows you to search for anything. Try typing the following three words in and looking at the pictures it sends you: "gloster meteor undercarriage".

  3. 7 hours ago, leccyflyer said:

    The smaller Cambrian fun-fighters can make decent PSS models, especially if you can keep them light, since they do have a reasonably thin airfoil. I don't know whether the larger Cambrian Fighters of the Fifties have similar sections, but would imagine that they probably do.

     

    That's in contrast to the WestField range of simple jet fighters - P-80, F-86, Mig-29 - which have simple flat plate wings, which I wouldn't have thought would excel on the slope.

    large.862904.jpg.80fffe886f626c88bca052c5f2970646.jpg

     

    Flat plate wings do work on the slope. My Tony Nijhuis Hawk (a contemporary to the Westfield kits) has done lots of flying.

    There is a Cambrian F86D in the PSSA that is waiting for a maiden. No reason to suppose it won't go well in the right conditions as it is similar to the mass build Sabre. You just need a good slope and some good lift and most things will go!

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, David Sack said:

    Hi Alan,

     

    Yes its the Hamilcar X if you go back on this forum you'll see my pics. The story is that I was planning to build a Horsa but that was not powered so didn't fit the bill. The Hamilcar however offered the glider plus the powered conversion ticking the boxes. And if it doesnt fly well as a soarer it will be easy to add motors ?

    29-3.jpg

    Good stuff Dave

    • Like 1
  5. 9 minutes ago, Rich Griff said:

    In New Zealand I think, you have to vote, you don't have to in this country.....

     

    Take that the right way, apply what you glean...we won't get fooled again, good song !

     

    You posted exactly the same thing yesterday on this thread! It wasn't exactly relevant the first time.

    • Like 1
  6. Lovely result! I would expect the Saito will have no problems with a relatively clean shape and 9.5lbs all up. I used to fly a Jungmann biplane that weighed 11lbs and had full rigging (and drag) on an SC 91 FS which was no powerhouse. It was overpowered.

    • Like 2
  7. I still don't think that's a crack, especially after saving the photo and zooming in. Is it untidy work? Yes!

    The fact that it's in exactly the same place on both rods suggests to me that it's just replicating a flaw or intentional feature in the casting tooling.

    • Like 1
  8. Is it actually a crack? The conrod looks cast or forged rather than machined from billet, so I wonder if it is actually thicker towards the big end and the line is simply where the extra material on the casting tapers away.

×
×
  • Create New...