Ultymate
-
Posts
1,776 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Calendar
Downloads
Posts posted by Ultymate
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The 16SZ got my vote being as it transmits both FASST and FASSTEST so it will function with my FASST RX's and any FASSTEST RX's I may buy in the future "simples" ?
-
From what I've read up this TX does not transmit FASST this being the main reason I recently bought the 16SZ as I have several models flying on FASST RX's.
-
I've just treated myself to the 16SZ, just in the process of setting up my first model with it, I'm pleased with it overall but it's quite a culture shock in as much it's like learning a different language ie no mention of exponential anymore you have to set up curves in what is now the AFR menu (Adjustable Function Rate). The transmitters capabilities are enormous, the manual although complex is a vast improvement on previous Futaba manuals ?
-
The trouble with most if not all 30/35 cc models are not designed to cater for the fitment of a canister the so called standard silencers that are supplied are little more than gas deflectors and the Pitts style ones are little if any better
-
Barry Lever AKA Mr OPS, I've never flown F3A but have flown IMAC, I took a sabbatical a "few" years back and did two or three years of 1/8 scale off road car racing and bought several OPS 21's from Bob Styles at Rossendale models excellent motors
-
Shame, but good luck with your endeavours
Edited By Ultymate on 24/02/2020 19:35:00
-
Purely a matter of taste, but I always whenever possible use a cable between the throttle servo and the carb and rely on the throttle spring to close the throttle. This greatly reduces the amount of vibration being fed directly into the servo
-
-
-
-
A bit presumptuous you buy a few second hand models and then make assumptions about "all" IC flyers (but not knocking IC flyers of course)
-
Posted by John Stainforth on 24/09/2019 00:24:04:Posted by bert baker on 23/09/2019 20:09:57:
But I stand corrected. Frictional forces along the sides of the wing tubes are apparently sufficient to hold wings on, so I have been wasting my time with wing bolts.
So you're the joker in the pack hey ? I never said that the friction on the wing tube was enough to hold the wings on, you firstly implied that Glen supplied just one wing bolt which was insufficient. You then said/ implied that a fast roll rate would see the wings departing to which I replied that the fast roll rate would increase said friction. I've flown several 50/60cc models where the wings are held by one wing bolt as supplied by several manufacturers and have had several of said models checked over by club safety officers and IMAC scrutineers. I also think that Glen may have a little understanding of the subject having been producing his models for a considerable time now
Edited By Ultymate on 24/09/2019 08:50:44
-
Posted by John Stainforth on 23/09/2019 18:25:56:
I would have thought that a high rate of roll could produce a not insignificant centrifugal force on the wings.
A high roll rate will also create a significant frictional load between the wing tube and it's mating tubes in the wings thus reducing any tendency for the wings to depart
-
Being born in North Staffordshire I was raised on Oat cakes, had half a dozen last week along with grilled bacon and cheese, as a matter of fact as they are readily available in N. Wales which is where I now reside. For the uninitiated they are a type of savoury pancake
-
Those bolts look like high tensile given the dark colour, I would suspect the prop came loose due to shrinkage of the wood. If using wooden props I would check them regularly when the prop is new and then less frequently as time goes by. A better choice is a carbon prop although I appreciate they're more expensive but their central bosses are much denser and do not compress like the wooden counterparts
Model flying photos you're proud of
in Photography
Posted
A scale Spitfire at Deeside MAC back in 2017