-
Posts
6,003 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Calendar
Downloads
Posts posted by PatMc
-
-
In the Chancellor's Autumn statement - atheist organisations will now be able to apply for the same tax status as charities since they don't have any prophets.
- 6
-
Worse things happen when you pass the 80 mark 😟
- 2
- 1
-
2 hours ago, MikeQ said:
Hi
anyone know of a motor similar spec to the P51 Motor/Gearbox cocmbo? Seems to be discontinued.
https://www.stevensaero.com/product/pkz3624/
Its for an Indoor FF model I’ve had on the back burner and want to get going.cheers
mike
Anything wrong with the replacement version suggested in the link in your post ?
- 2
-
20 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:
Often it's not so easy as the rubbish grub screws have been over tightened the the heads rounded off,,,
There is nothing lost in trying.
If the grubb screws can be moved but the shaft won't budge when using a press of some sort then I would not resort to using a hammer as the shock could loosen one or more of the magnets. At that point I'd get an adapter, though I've never had to so far.
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, Martin Harris - Moderator said:
It’s not uncommon (actually it’s the norm) for motor shafts to be interference fits. It may be a bit late but confirmation from the supplier might have allowed the simpler and cheaper option. I would never advocate hammering a shaft though - a press would be the better option but you can often use a vice and suitable spacers/supports such as sockets or old bearings etc.
I've used a vertical drill as a press on motor shafts.
The shaft in Toto' motor has a flat cut out on the protruding end that will line up with the grub screw in the spacer at that end of the shaft. There will be a similarly spaced flat at the other end of the shaft that will line up with the grub screw at that end.
i.e. there will be 4 cut out flats on the shaft to allow the shaft to be reversed by pushing it to it's new position then secured by the grub screws without needing to completely remove the shaft & turn it around.
- 1
-
We used to have access to a small lake about 10 miles from my club but after we'd had a few 'splash ins' it became unavailable. Also took part in some events at Kielder reservior many years ago - great fun at both venues. 😊
PS forgot to mention - once went on an island hopping (local taxi service) DH Beaver flight from Coal Harbour, Vancouver. About an hour or so round trip. An interesting experience, also spent found it fascinating watching the various other waterplane activities in what was a fairly busy harbour.
- 1
-
46 minutes ago, Nick Cripps said:
And landing it on water is even bigger.
The wrong kind of bigger thrill if you're model is a gllider & the water is part of the North Sea !! 😳
-
-
-
-
I'd use silver solder & possibly the ball of a bal link instead of brass tube.
-
The most important readings will be the current at full throttle. This must be under the max current for both the motor & the ESC.
-
A 12 x 6 folder should be good but check that the current draw is under the max for your ESC/motor combo. I always go for full on/off with near vertical climb dead upwind for about 30 secs of power then hunt the thermal. Any aerobatics are power off & always try for a near pre-marked spot landing - it's good practice & adds something to achieve to each flight.
-
Rounded or squared whichever looks best to you. There's no aerodynamic benefit either way.
-
19 hours ago, i12fly said:
Have you considered Urolift? where the prostate is pinned back to keep the urethra open?
I'm going for assessment in about 2 months time but don't know anybody who has had it. It seems to be less brutal than other solutions and doesn't interfere with bedtime activities if you see what I mean. Its available on NHS but not all hospitals do it.
So far only HoLEP has been mentioned by the urologist but as far as I can see it's no more invasive than Urolift.
My bedtime activities are limited to walking to the loo several times each night poking Mr Dribles in the eye with a plastic tube waiting 'till the tears stop then making the return journey back to bed. 😒
Good luck with whichever procedure you choose 👍
- 1
-
Thanks Ian, David & Martian for the info & good wishes.
Martian, the HoLEP op involves passing a telescope (Not James Webb proportions I hope !!) through the urethra & using laser fibre to do the "re-bore" then chop up & remove some more bits of the prostate. So it's front door entry not back door like your neighbour.
In the mean time I've received a 4 month action plan starting tomorrow with a review by telephone then some more tests etc finaly to be offered to be added to the waiting list for HoLEP. If the opportunity arises I'll ask to be put on the list before the 4 months is up.
Any further info will be gratefully received,
Pat.
-
Thanks for the reply BiB. I should have mentioned HoLEP isn't a cancer treatment it's basically a "rebore" of the urethra (pee pipe) using laser to clear obstructions .
About 5 weeks ago Mr Dribbles elevated his prolonged industrial lethargy from go slow to all out strike, necessitating in a trip to A &E where I was fitted up with a semi permanent catheter with accessories. This has since been changed to a more discreet but in some respects less convenient DIY, disposable one shot catheters plus the return to nightly sleep walking comfort breaks routine.
Before I commit to a HoLEP operation I would like to hear the pros & cons from anyone else's experience of the procedure or alternative procedures.
-
Has anyone any experience of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) ?
I am to be offered entry onto a waiting list for this procedure in the next month or so & would like to know as much about the pros & cons of the options available if I agree to go ahead with the operation.
Also would like to know how much long term real life benefit & detriment (if any) experienced after the procedure.
Thanks in advance for any info.
-
25 minutes ago, Martian said:
That looks strangely like Dawn French
Nah, there's no "dog" collar. 😜
-
44 minutes ago, Basil said:
Like us all. We should ask why seemingly infants are becoming less tolerant to everyday exposeur to the things of life.
For the same reason that life-time diseases of the past aren't around anymore, infant mortality rates have dropped to a fraction of what they were & this post is being read by a much older demograph than would have ben possible in the good old days. 😉
-
Ditto.
-
7 hours ago, Peter Miller said:
When I was three we were at war and mud and worms were rationed
We had to take tablets to get rid of the worms 'cause they were eating us. 😟
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, Phil Green said:
Whereas more recently at Nont Sarahs we've had days where every set at the slope was a homebrew 🙂
Must get lonely flying lonely your own, Phil ! 😁
- 2
-
6 hours ago, David Davis said:
I think it's a Southerner Major built off a Ben Buckle plan. https://www.benbucklevintage.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2_9&products_id=125.
If it is fitted with an OS four-stroke, it must be larger than a 20 because the model has an 84" wingspan and a 20 four-stroke would never fly it..
I have a copy of the original Ben Buckle catalogue, it's definitely not a Southerner Major. As jeff2wings posted it seems to be an enlarged version of the KK Bandit.
The wing root LE cut-away & tailplane position on the fuselage fuselage are identity give-aways.
Rubber Bands
in Traditional kits
Posted
It isn't. 😉