Matt - The main reason we don't generally do entirely bespoke undercarriages is the man hours it takes to create a decent mould in the first place, there are a number of ways to do this in a temporary way, a sheet of 2-3mm thick aluminium bent to shape works and the method shown in the article above by Ken also looks good. If we were supplied a mould by a customer (which does happen both with trade customers and regular modelers) we could create an undercarriage for a specified plane weight from any material.
Bob - When I took over I was generally told not to give away information on resins used on the basis that it is effectively a trade secret and it would be bad for us if people (possibly in China) were to replicate our process however if people think that we are making an inferior product as a result of that I guess I will have to break that rule.
The resin used in our undercarriages is an epoxy based vinylester resin. It is a very high quality resin roughly twice the price of a standard Lloyds approved poly resin, if you have a look online there are countless discussions of Epoxy V Vinylester and their relative strengths, generally speaking they give similar performance. We used it based on a study into full sized composite aircraft landing gear that found vinylester worked very well. There are several benefits of using this, it is U.V resistant, has a long gel time and it is significantly less toxic than epoxy when used in a dusty environment. Considering we cut and belt sand our undercarriages to shape in a very dust heavy environment this is important to us.
It may not be the absolute theoretical best out there but it is certainly the best all rounder for our uses. There are a number of reasons for an undercarriage to fail but the majority of these are down to the skill of the laminator rather than material qualities.
Thanks,
Chris