NigelH

As I thought (BMFA), the 400 feet limit is for outside controlled airspace and over 7kg. Inside controlled airspace, there could be less restrictions. Or more.

Thanks. That's what I did several times so I may as well delete the above link.

I've edited the above post several times and although thr URL is clean enough and I've used the proper 'insert URL' function, it simply will not display properly.   Edited By NigelH on 15/08/2012 08:38:10

If you life depends on one go to the link posted below by Pete. I came across this vendor the other day when looking for something else.  I'll give him a miss.   Edited By NigelH on 15/08/2012 08:51:17

Ok, so now I read again and see that you like the bolt-on ones. I've used the E-Flite Power 32 with the stock prop adapter with no issues.

Posted by Phil B on 09/08/2012 20:29:14: well I am looking for a cheaper version of a eflight power 32 motor for a eflight extra 300 32e Although I've still not used it, I've bought a Turnigy Easymatch G32 770kv as an alternative to the Power 32. There's some setup info and good comments about it.

I'm far from being a beginner but I've been thinking about getting a HK Bixler, which I guess is a clone of the Easystar, for those times when it's a bit windy or the grass is too long and I don't want to fly a more valuable balsa model. I've ordered one of those 3-axis stabilisers. They could make a good pair for those all too frequent windy days.

I watched that but thought that they didn't making a convincing case for buying one. I have though, already ordered one of those orange three-axis units.  I hope that they're not the same.   Edited By NigelH on 09/08/2012 20:40:00

It has been suggested several times on here that the PP motors are the same as the HK motors so it may be worth you looking in that direction too and reading the reviews. I take it that you have a model in mind for the purchase ?

Posted by ConcordeSpeedbird on 09/08/2012 19:20:09: Also, you might want to stop suggesting a Wot 4 every time someone asks what they should buy, regardless of their differing circumstances. One size doesn't fit all. The Wot 4 is undoubtly a great design. Suggesting it to others may lead to them going out and getting one and then having many fun and happy flying hours with a strong, versatile and brilliant flying aeroplane. The problem with that is they may also buy one and then smack it into the floor because they're not ready for it. Money wasted. Deflated. The Wot 4 Foam-E isn't a 'leccy trainer' as mentioned by the OP.

Posted by ConcordeSpeedbird on 09/08/2012 17:09:13: Well this may be a bit too advanced, but a Foam E Wot 4? Put the rates very low and it is as docile as a duck (are ducks docile?!). And it is very strong. Multiplex Minimag is easier to fly, see what others think. CS Indeed. Also, you might want to stop suggesting a Wot 4 every time someone asks what they should buy, regardless of their differing circumstances. One size doesn't fit all.

Not me. What are you looking for ? People may be able to suggest alternatives too.

If it's doing that with nothing attached to it, I'd not be using it. Also, take some pics showing the linkages.

E-Flite Alpha Sport 450 ?

I think that this would be a total blast.

There's something called 'binding' where servo movement is hindered by stiff hinges, tight linkages, control surfaces reaching their limits, etc. This can be sorted out by making mechanical adjustments and ought to be done as it can cause a big battery drain problem. Retracts are well known for this and people fit an extra battery, just in case. I can't imagine that the servos would be doing too well either.

Posted by Tony Bennett on 06/08/2012 11:55:43: if its not raining here its blowing a gale. i give up think i will take up stamp collecting. I know what you mean. It's pretty deflating. Makes me think the same. I keep looking at new models but TBH, what's the point when I can't fly what I've already got ? I've ordered one of those HK 3-axis flight stabilisers and may fit it to something cheap and cheerful so that I can be more comfortable about going out when it's windy.

Page 44 of the manual covers wing types. You could always just use a Y-lead though

The Decathlon EP flies very nicely on a 3S 2200 and a 300 watt power system. As they say, this flies like a larger model.

ESC goes into throttle. You can set up your model on the TX to use two channels and then, IIRC use AIL for the right servo and AUX1 for the left. Of course, it depends on what TX you have. Wing types are easy to set up on the DX8, for example.

A bit optimistic ?

Posted by Christian Ackroyd on 06/08/2012 17:58:31: Very good looking model there. Cover it in clear film What is it ?

So it is. Mine had the tank on the back though.

Now that reminds me of my first ever glow engine from, maybe 1980, a Testors .049. Same spring starter and integral fuel tank.

I agree that extra battery weight is better than ballast. Someone who's building one of these told me today that the retailer was saying that another customer was flying one at 600 watts and was experiencing tail flutter. That's worth considering while you're flying. The model looks good until you read the specs. It was me who started what's probably the main Wot 4 e balsa thread. I've been getting my batteries from Hobby King for quite a long time and they've been pretty good for the money. I had to send one back with a dead cell. Be sure to check whatever you buy as soon as it arrives, just in case, regardless of the vendor.