Michael Tinkler

Many thanks. Off to the patch. Keep up the good work.

Peter, I've just taken the spats off my Cap20 (after 2+ years of enjoyable flying. I seem to have misplaced the plan and the mag article doesn't mention it. Could you remind me of the recommended C of G which was fine. Thanks in advance..

Just taken the spats off my Cap 20. Hope to fly tomorrow. Misplaced the plan. Can anyone remind me of the C of G position

Peter Of course I meant I had been flying the 21 since it was in the mag. I thoroughly enjoyed it until the battery (broken wire) failure. It was the one time I have willed a model to crash. Once Tx contact was lost it just flew on until eventually she dropped the left wing and arrived. I was relieved.

Great to see this as a freebie in RCME. I've been flying the 20 since it was in the mag. Just before the biblical flooding a defective Rx battery saw the 20 plough in. Now I can start all over again. P.S. Tell that nice man at Vortex. It came as a surprise when I ordered a canopy

Agree about an Axis WW11 job How about the Fiat (something) Good looking aircraft and please let there be an i.c. version

1. Mode 2  2. Glos  3. Kent  4. Informal instruction

It should be ready for those calm, warm summer evenings throttled back against a mackerel sky. JUST MAKE IT HAPPEN1

So is this what RCME is to become - an ARTF cataloque with free stickers - presumably the technical articles will tell us how to apply the stickers - I think we should submit any such plans to Birtie for his considered opinion first. Seriously I have become increasingly concerned about the number of 'kit' reviews of ARTF and so called 'park' flyers which are in reality toys appearing in RCME. I guess that commercial considerations - review a product and sell a page of advertising to the importer - is a driving force. Those of us who build and fly rather than buy and fly still want a magazine that caters for grownups.