Jump to content
Please be aware of scammers when using the Sale/Wanted forum areas

Pete B

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,472

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Pete B

  1. Pete B
    Posted by john stones 1 on 31/08/2019 21:44:03: So I predicted it correctly and gained nothing, magic. Interesting - I've never seen John in 'pre-flounce' mood before....... Nice to see he takes this seriously, like me! Pete
  2. Pete B
    Yep, after P3 I thought I'd revise my predictions too.... Er, perhaps not - let's hope my first instincts were correct! Pete
  3. Pete B
    Sorry to hear that news. What Brian didn't know about IC could have been written on a Post-it note. His legacy will be the many, many articles and 'how-to's' that have helped thousands of model flyers across the world. Condolences to his family and friends. RIP Brian Pete
  4. Pete B
    The search function isn't too sophisticated, unfortunately, as it only search headings and the phrasing must be identical with the original, so it's best to select one keyword and scroll through the results to find the thread you want. Both the above methods work, too... Pete
  5. Pete B
    Moved your post here, Chris - Rob beat you to it! Pete
  6. Pete B
    Posted by john stones 1 on 04/08/2019 23:20:17: Still can't predict and my teams lost the plot, giz a shout if you find it, well done lads. Me neither - two correct predictions in the past two races really hasn't done me any favours It can all be best summed up by the phrase from the financial world 'past performance is not an indicator of future outcomes'....... Pete
  7. Pete B
    Well done, Chris! Bit miffed with Vettel as his overtake at the end cost me getting on for about 20 points... Ah well, eyes down and look in for Spa! Pete
  8. Pete B
    Posted by John Privett on 28/07/2019 21:39:57: Posted by iqon on 28/07/2019 21:26:42: Hang on, channel 4 shows penalties I may lose a few points Yep - from F1.com, "Raikkonen and Giovinazzi had 30 seconds added to their race times for use of driver aids at the start." That's already accounted for in the results published. Amongst other changes, it elevates Hamilton up to 9th. Yes, John - just checked the website and they haven't yet adjusted the points - not that it'll make much difference to me! Pete
  9. Pete B
    Nice one, iqon I've had better days..... Pete
  10. Pete B
    Mea culpa..... I changed my pole prediction based on what happened in FP3 just before quali started - that'll teach me to lose the faith... Pete
  11. Pete B
    With cooler temps and rain forecast from tomorrow, I wouldn't bet against Lewis in the wet.... Pete
  12. Pete B

    Electric Cars.

    Pete B replied to Cuban8's topic in Chit-chat

    Posted by Tom Sharp 2 on 23/07/2019 22:31:03: Posted by Doc Marten on 23/07/2019 22:18:16: The trouble with an 84 page thread is that posters are loathe to read what has been said a hundred times before. And if you try to start a second thread the moderators will slap you down. Believe me Tom, given the amount of time the mods have had to devote to monitoring this thread, there won't be an opportunity for a second electric car thread..... Pete
  13. Pete B
    I've removed a number of off-topic posts from the thread. If any of you have any differences of opinion, deal with them, privately rather than use any handy thread as a boxing ring. It's rather rude, to say the least Nu Me 1, I'll apologise on behalf of the mods for letting this interfere with a useful, informative build thread. We will keep an eye on things. I'm sure the majority of viewers would prefer that you continue to share the build as you're getting good advice here Pete
  14. Pete B
    Above points noted, we'll pass it on to those concerned Pete
  15. Pete B

    Electric Cars.

    Pete B replied to Cuban8's topic in Chit-chat

    Posted by Frank Skilbeck on 23/07/2019 09:54:34: Reminds me of my first moped a step thru with pedals, it had a 1/2 gal fuel tank, I only ran out of petrol once and had to pedal 3 miles home.................... never did it again............................ Been there, Frank, and heartily agree. Mine was an NSU Quickly (an oxymoron if I ever heard one). ISTR spending more time pedalling it than being propelled.... Pete
  16. Pete B

    Moon landing

    Pete B replied to J D 8's topic in Chit-chat

    Posted by Doc Marten on 21/07/2019 13:19:46: Posted by Wilco Wingco on 21/07/2019 13:08:32: Doc Martin. My final comment NOT an anti American rant. Watch this and judge for yourself?. **LINK** Honestly wilco I'm not interested, I haven't opened the link nor do I intend to. This is a topic about the moon landings not a political debate Indeed, let's keep it that way, folks.... Pete
  17. Pete B
    Well done, Simon and Chris - even on a better day you've got the edge.... I really must thank Mr. S. Vettel for his timely assistance yesterday In the league, there seems to be a gap opening up between the top teams and the midfield. I'm definitely the Gasly here at present but how soon will that become the Vettel...??? Pete
  18. Pete B
    Hi Jonathan, Welcome to the forum - you're not the first long time lurker to eventually succumb.... I'm aware you've waited some time to get this post approved so I'll bump it up the list to get some coverage Pete
  19. Pete B

    Pete B posted a gallery image in Member Albums

  20. Pete B

    Pete B posted a gallery image in Member Albums

  21. Pete B

    Pete B posted a gallery image in Member Albums

  22. Pete B
    I don't think it's a matter of being over-sensitive. I think it's exposed the core attitude of the 'full-size' organisations as to their disdainful dismissal of model flyers as an irrelevance. Make no mistake, this is about money and the use of sub-500ft airspace for commercial use. They would be far happier to sweep us aside without any consideration... we are economically worth zilch Pete Edited By Pete B - Moderator on 27/06/2019 18:49:47
  23. Pete B
    I've just emailed NATS here. Sir, I am utterly appalled at the description given to 'drone flyers' as 'clueless, careless or criminal' by your NATS representative in yesterday's Science and Technology Committee sitting. I am a member of the BMFA and have flown radio-controlled model aircraft since 1975. It is no fault of we model flyers that the authorities have decided to include our activities, as well as those of the irresponsible minority of multi-rotor flyers, in an oppressive, restrictive piece of legislation which will have significant consequences on our, so far over many, many years, demonstrably safe hobby. It is apparent that NATS has a partisan and jaundiced view of model flyers. If not, then it has demonstrated a lamentable lack of understanding of the subject. Such a prejudiced view from witnesses should have no part in Parliamentary proceedings. Andy Sage is clearly not competent in his role and consideration should be given to replacing him with one who is more open-minded and knowledgeable on the subject. At the very least, a public apology and retraction of that statement by the head of NATS is the least that we should expect. I await your response with interest - as do the 36000 BMFA members who fly in the UK. Not expecting anything constructive from this but, hey, it gets it off your chest.... Pete
  24. Pete B

    TRAPPED

    Pete B replied to onetenor's topic in Chit-chat

    I'm sure SR71 is your best bet for contacting the other guys, John, so we'll leave it to him. Meanwhile, best wishes for a speedy recovery - and don't give the nurses too much grief! Pete
  25. Pete B
    I can assure you, Don, that I don't believe anything useful could ever have grown on this bit of France. That's why they probably decided to build a race track here I have to admit to imbibing a glass or two of Chilean Merlot from Lidl this evening... Chris, will you kindly stop putting the kiss of death on my predictions, please - you've done it again! Pete
×
×
  • Create New...