Wookman

Should be. Should just be a matter of getting the back off and swapping the spring for the ratchet. Simple screwdriver job.

That was exactly the problem. Holding the bind button down until the receiver had bound was what I was doing. Normally not a problem, until UNI comes along. Set the receiver to bind and release the button prior to setting the tx to bind. Bind to each tx like this and the rx swapped between txs very quickly with no problem.

The speed and depth of the support for the UNI firmware is impressive and much appreciated.

Sorted! Thanks Mike.

Reflashed from sd card. Reactivated. Same problem. It won’t remind to other tx. Binding and rebinding done at about 3 meters distance. Only thing left is to down load a new cut of the firmware maybe?

Doesn’t matter which tx is a or b. Bind to a. Then bind to b. Then try and bind back to a and it won’t. Doesn’t matter which tx is which a or b. It will not bind back to the other as expected in uni.

Just about a meter away. Similar distance to the original bind process.

I think the green led flashes momentarily within a second or two of powering up the rx. But it then reverts to a flashing red.

V2EU on the tx. 57 on the X6R rx. Other tx on and binding mode. Rx on. Red flashing light, no bind.

There are things that UNI will do that are useful. The full list of features is not hard to find. I suppose the the question is whether you are aware of any short comings in the firmware you are using? Fine tuning the rx to the tx is a good feature but works in the background. Channel mapping might be useful. The ability to customise outputs to suit digital or analogue servos.

I got my activation code from Aloft but I don't suppose that makes any difference?

Rx sits with red light flashing but does not rebind to other tx. It remains bound to the first tx. The two txs are clones of one another in that the sd cards are copies of each other and the model info has been synced via companion. Not sure this is relevant as the rx is looking for the id of the rf section.

Having bound to both txs, followed above procedure

I have got my X6R uni activated. Follow the instructions but dual bind will not work. Two X9D+ on V2 lbt. Rx will bind to both txs but will not swap from one to the other. Rx remains bound to first tx. Any ideas?

Any idea how long an activation code takes to come from T9. Sent one on Wednesday first thing, nothing back yet.

You can get hold of Mike via the BARCS forum. He is rcsoar.

Taranis X9D+ with OTX 2.3.15 and ACCST V2. It is the binding bit I am getting wrong. To recap: Flash Rx, unplug from Tx Bind Run ACTIVATE. LUA email T9 the code Run Lua again and insert activation code received from T9 Rebind if necessary. Thanks for the quick response Mike.

I have a problem activating UNI firmware. Firmware seems to flash to the rx fine. When I run the activation script it returns a code of 888888. I have tried two rxs, both return a code of 888888. Rxs are X6R flashing with x8r_rom57sm.frk. Activate script is filed with the firmware on the sd card in FIRMWARE/ACCST UNI/ It also generates a file called activate.luac Anybody able to shed any light?

If you are happy buying second hand, how about a Taranis? I recently picked up one at £80 with hall sticks and an eneloop battery and hard case. I then couldn't resist another at £45 with hall sticks and a life battery. Rxs are readily available and relatively cheap. The ACCST protocol is proven reliable. And you have the fun of sticking your head down the OpenTx rabbit warren, great fun. And will never likely have a model that the Taranis will not be able to fly.

Sooner or later you will have the rate set wrong. Use a bit of expo and you still have full movement available when you need it but with soft centres like a decent box of chocolates. Anything that lightens the workload while you are flying is good. That's where modern computer txs come into there own.

Things always change otherwise we would still all be flying single channel with a button and sewn hinges. Embrace the change you like, ignore the change you don't.

It is definitely not a Virage, unless it has been very heavily modified.

It's not Foss or one of Stans @ Phoenix MP. Looking at the amount of curvature on the wing seat the wing would have been close to symmetrical. An aerobatic model rather than a soarer perhaps?

Pictures will generate some interest.

That is what I said.