Jump to content

Crane Fly Trainer Autogyro


Tom Wright  2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Advert


Hi Tom, thats good news. Means you are not tied down to a certain weight of battery. Its great to be that flexible. Any news yet on the sale of the blades. I am champing at the bit here and not enought ime to do what I want to do,a couple of repairs on the bench, a SFH Cranefly partially built and wishing there were 48 hours in a day. I often wonder how I found time to go to work, I seem to be on the go doing other non modelling jobs around the house. Not what I intended for my retirement.

Oops!!! I hope she does not see this. I love her to bits really. Hee.hee,hee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bill, I also wish you a speedy recovery from your op. I was just wondering why, when you are in the States you do not avail yourself of the excellent blades made by Aerobalsa. I was in Florida last August and I got two sets sent to me at the villa that we rented in Kissimmee. They were of an excellent quality and one set is going on to a DAG autogyro and the other set for the Firefly 2. But not until I have mastered the Cranefly aand have a greater understanding of how these things fly. Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats very sad news Tom. When did this happen. I spoke to him several times before I went out to Florida last August. I wonder if my blades are the last ones that he made. Any idea what pulled him down, because when I last spoke to him, he was very chipper and a real gentleman. He put himself out to get my blades ready for when I got out to Kissimmee. To be honest, I had not tried to access his site for a while. Howw did you find this out Tom, was it mentioned in the RCM&E by any chance.??

Anyway, I am off to bed now, missus says she is cold and wants my body, just for warmth, don't you know. Ooh Renee!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two more successfull flights this afternoon and was doing figure eight circuits and was flying it a little bit furher away and did not lose orientation, Hardly any wind today so i must work harder at getting a controlled landing using throttle and elevator. Set my timer with my 1800 li-pos to 5 mins with a little bit extra juice left just in case but i must say with all the concentration needed the 5 mins seens like 1 or iam just starting to enjoy these CF flights more now that iam slowly getting used to the CF. Must get some more packs. Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot to ask you a question Tom.

As you know iam in the process of building the CFL amongst other fixed wing projects and i know you say it makes for a better flyer with rudder but am i not making it more difficult regarding orientation with it being smaller. Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Airtime is is everything Glen , glad to hear you progressing well . smile.

As for your question , if I understand correctly , the coupled rudder really does make directional and roll control very easy , if the rudder is not coupled then it would need a pilot that can accurately balance rudder and roll without thinking . The Light design, if built , and set up to plan, results in the rudder leading the roll control which for this model results in a very positive but smooth and easy to handle response, best to ignore the pundits as they will not have flown this machine and no doubt will be applying fixed wing experience to an auto gyro . I have not found that the slightly smaller overall dimensions results in an increased risk of disorientation as the model, if built to plan and flown as suggested, will normally give more time to decide what's happening .

Thanks for keeping us updated ,will look forward to news of further flights.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom, looking forward to flying a autogyro with rudder and making slow progress with the CFL but have two other projects going at the same time. I keep thinking about changing the under carriage if you remember I made a mistake with the measure which makes very hard on landing without it topping over onto the blades. I have a carbon under carriage weighing aroun 43grams which I thought I could bolt directly to the underside but not sure if it would make a difference to the flying , what do you reckon. Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tom, looking forward to flying a autogyro with rudder and making slow progress with the CFL but have two other projects going at the same time. I keep thinking about changing the under carriage if you remember I made a mistake with the measure which makes very hard on landing without it topping over onto the blades. I have a carbon under carriage weighing aroun 43grams which I thought I could bolt directly to the underside but not sure if it would make a difference to the flying , what do you reckon. Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glen I think modifying that floppy uc would be good.

If you plan to continue hand launching the model then a lower set arrangement will be fine but , with a wide track at least as much as you have at the moment . The lipo position can be adjusted to take account of any cog shift .

Another option would be to bend the existing uc to give a wider track and , if required, cut some off and, re bend the axle, if you find it's still not rigid enough you could add back stays as I did with the CFG , or as an alternative to a back stay you may find that a cross brace will be sufficient.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Richard Franks on 05/09/2013 19:21:47:

if i use an ic engine on a crane fly what size would you suggest?

Richard

Hi Richard

Welcome to the thread.

I have not flown a lightweight auto gyro powered with IC , and I think electric would probably be an easier route if you have not flown autogyros before. Something like a cox 049 with it's integral tank and bulkhead mounting would be my first thought but, you do need throttle control . It will also depend on which Crane Fly model you were contemplating but, as a guide around 3 /4 of a pound of thrust , will be needed for the CF Lite and the weight of the motor with silencer ,mount ,and fuel , should not exceed 5 ozs . A little more power will be needed for the CF SFH model.

Hope that might be of some help.    

Tom.

Edited By Tom Wright 2 on 05/09/2013 21:54:22

Edited By Tom Wright 2 on 05/09/2013 22:14:22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom, Undercarriage sorted, as i said used a carbon leg with spats on and simply screwed to the foremost front fire wall looks kinda neat and allso helps with orientation as well. Not as much width and depth as the original piano wire but works a treat. Hardly any trim change and no more tipping over on landing and was even tempted to do a touch and go but at the moment satisfied with getting my landings even better. Keep you posted , Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds good Glen thumbs up, and a step forward now you are getting the hang of the flying side of things . The rigid uc may not give as much crash resistance and, depending how low the model sits it may not want to take off again, in low wind, after touching down. This does make landings easier as the model will lose lift very quickly once on the ground and is less likely to be effected by wind.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tom , forgot about the low angle of the blades, glad i did not try a touch and go. As for crash resistance you are right but if i make a hash of things i am hoping it will just rip the undercarraige off with the screws straight out but hopefully iam getting better now with my overall flying and landing touch wood, but you never know as it allways comes back to give you a kick up the back side just when you think its getting easier. Made a little bit more progress on the CFL but have got a couple more fixed wing projects going as well which is taking up my time but with 3 models on the building board i am still looking for my next autogyro, at the moment it is the Panther because it still classed as a trainer but i still like the Dag R2 but dont fancy building from scratch as i have no patience regarding cutting the formers etc. Best regards Glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glen

It sounds if you have got plenty of building work on the go smile p.It might be an idea to check the boom sit angle as if it is around 10 degrees touch and goes should be ok, particularly if there is a bit of head wind. The Lite sits low, (about 11 degrees ) and will touch, run ,and go, just fine and, as you already have the mast rake back angle to add to the boom angle you will probably have around 15 degrees total.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...