Jump to content

Strange millimetres


Recommended Posts

Someone recommended some kit from Proops Brothers, and browsing their site I found these

Proops Brothers Deuxieme Guage

They looked cheap and interesting, so I added them to my order.

(From http://www.proopsbrothers.com/acatalog/Online_Catalogue_Gauges_55.html )

Here they are.

gauge1


So I tried to measure something, and the numbers on the scale did non make a lot of sense.

I contacted Proops Brothers, and got the explanatory reply:-

Hello

Scale is in mm.

Proops

 

Funny millimetres!

Here I am measuring the thickness of a small engineer's square.

gauge2

And the gauge reading!

http://www.proopsbrothers.com/acatalog/Online_Catalogue_Gauges_55.htmlgauge3

I read that as 44 somethings.

How thick is the square?

gauge4

Using my trusty Aldi verniers - and yes, I did zero them first - we get 8.51mm.

Can anyone provide sanity?

Plummet

Edited By Plummet on 10/04/2014 14:53:55

Edited By Plummet on 10/04/2014 14:56:27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


Posted by Antiquated on 10/04/2014 15:45:11:

I think it is related to this: **LINK** But 44/8.5 is approximately 5.18, a strange number.

 

All is revealed. wink It is an old (pre-1875 ) French tool for measuring "points".

"And what do points mean?"

Plummet

Edited By Plummet on 10/04/2014 16:25:10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um...

0.188 mm according to Antiquated's link above.

Doing the sums from my measurements... (See the piccies above.)

8.51 / 44 = 0.193 mm = 1 division

Now

1 inch = 25.4mm

1/72 of an inch is

25.4 / 72 = 0.35 mm

So I think my gauge is nearer to the defunct french units than the current printing units. (0.188 cf. 0.193)

Should we start a campaign to persuade RCM&E to add dimensions in pieds, pouces, lignes and points?

Plummet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Plummet on 10/04/2014 22:47:10:
Posted by Tony K on 10/04/2014 22:21:22:

Pedant alert! The correct name is "douzieme gauge".

angel I don't believe you. Proops Brothers spell it differently and surely they cannot be wrong!

Plummet

 

The ancient measuring system previously referred to is based on a series of twelfth divisions.

Douze = twelve, Deux = two. Proops are wrong. smiley

 

Edited By Tony K on 11/04/2014 08:28:53

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Tony K on 11/04/2014 08:15:22:

The ancient measuring system previously referred to is based on a series of twelfth divisions.

Douze = twelve, Deux = two. Proops are wrong. smiley

Correct. Proops may be an accomplished seller of tools and gauges but they haven't quite got the measure of French.... I'll get me coat now....wink 2

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...