Jump to content

Supermarine 317 Bomber, Mitchell's last design.


Recommended Posts

image.jpgimage.jpgimage.jpgimage.jpgI think this is about as far as I can go without sorting out the power train and servo positions, so I'm going to buy the set-up for the Nihuis 72" Lancaster and draw up the details of the engine nacelles and where everything will fit in the fuselage, access hatches etc. I've already got the Eflite retracts. It's an interesting build and looks right, I'm optimistic but there's a lot to do.image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've bitten the bullet and ordered the complete set from 4Max, motors, ESCs, BEC, Lipo and props. George is always quick, so I expect they'll arrive very soon. The only reservation I've got is the props, 2xleft hand and 2xright hand GWS 7x3 three bladers. The point has already been made in the forum that these flatten out at high rpm under load and lose their pitch, so there might be a problem. If anyone reading this thread has any further thoughts on it I'd be very interested to hear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.jpgNo shed time today but stayed inside and managed to do a bit of work on the cabin window detail and gun turrets design. Drawings are limited and show some variation in cabin and fuselage windows. Based on photos of the completed prototype fuselage I think this is about right. 3 side windows shown on drawings and on a Supermarine model are not evident on the prototype, so I'm not including them. The gun turrets aren't completely clear either, but this seems to be close enough. Eric Morgan says that these were Supermarine's design working with Thompson and Nash and were designed to give the gunner a completely clear field of view, with the guns at knee level. He also says that there could be 2 or 4 guns and that front and rear were going to be interchangeable. I haven't tried to take this into account, what I have drawn here is a reasonable compromise based on the small scale drawings we do have. He also describes a retractable ventral turret which sounds like another unique design with a small diameter and a very high rate of rotation. I can't see any sign of this on available illustrations so won't make provision for it. There does appear to be a flat bomb-aimer's panel beneath the nose and I will show that. At this stage I probably won't go for transparent glazing, but will use black paint.image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Dylan. There's a lot of detail to sort out so I need to begin drawing it in. How do I set up twin rudders with a steerable tail-wheel for instance? I'm thinking 3x9g servos, 1 in each fin and 1 on the tailwheel connected to the Rx through Y-leads?

Tony, I'm on the slow side so it's very unusual for me to have a good idea in advance, but this is definitely useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not so sure about that Andrew, I'm in the perpetual amateur and codger category, the brains behind the structural design is Dylan. It's at the stage where I've got to make decisions about where everything goes inside it, servo positions, snakes/push-rods, access hatches etc. so work needs to be done on that before I can complete the fuselage structure. The tailplane and twin fin set-up need to be co-ordinated with that. I've got a bit more time this week, so the hope is to do a bit more on it as well as get some of the Chipmunk build sorted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not in the least 2W. It's just that I agreed to join in the Chipmunk build and they're running side by side. In that project I'm testing some ideas on a composite build, mixing Depron with balsa where it's appropriate and particularly to replace balsa for the sheeting and planking. I found with the Barnstormer build that Depron skinned with 17gm glass cloth and Ezekote was at least as good, if not better, than doing the same with balsa. Therefore I'm now testing it on a bigger scale with the Chipmunk and if it continues to look good, that's what I'm going to do with the 317.

I'm keen to get on with this and time is always a problem, but hopefully I'll be able to report more before too long. Thanks for your interest, I hope to justify it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
  • 2 years later...

Hi William. It’s definitely not dead. I wanted to get some varied build practice in, particularly experimenting with Depron to reduce weight in appropriate places and also with electrics. The Chipmunk turned out to be far more time consuming than I expected and I allowed myself to be diverted along the way with other interesting things, such as contra-props in the XB42 and Depron converted Super Marauder, both successful.

Time has been a major factor because I still haven’t fulfilled my intention to properly retire and I’ve been away from home for seven weeks this year! Although Dylan produced drawings for the 317 and a kit of laser cut ply parts, there’s still a bit of design work to be done, as you will recall from earlier posts the fuselage is half built and doing that clarified some of the issues needing to be resolved. My motivation remains and I intend to get it right. As soon as I can clear the decks I’ll get on with it, so don’t give up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...