rathers Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 I have built 4 Maricardos following the article in 2004 and I''m attaching a pic of my latest. It is an excellent all round plane for a club flyer like myself but will also perform great aerobatics as demonstrated by our club examiner Shane Harding who flew a perfect rolling circle when he test flew it for me. My version has an OS 46 AX, bigger tank, diferential aileron throws and 4 degree side thrust. However, the plan leaves a lot to be desired and conflicts with the article. The former dimensions are wrong, the fuselage does not match the modified wing and you cannot buid the cockpit/tank bay from the plan but have to make it up as you go along. There are a number of other minor errors. Nothing that an experienced modeller cannot fix but it is a pity that the plan was not been modified after I spoke to Graham Ashby soon after it was printed. For this latest version I had Belair produce a laser cut parts set ( dimensions modified) which at £70 was pretty good value although ther were a couple of minor errors. I''m sorry to seem to be carping but this might help other builders and the plane is certainly worth the effort. Ken Rathborne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.A. Barry Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 I came across the Maricardo, in a model mag in the mid 70's, not sure whiich one now, (model aicraft or english RCM), not sure wether it was a free plan, but it was certaintly good flyer, I have threatened myself to do another, but with so many other projects, it possibly won't happen Yea, good to see it reinvented A.A Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 I have a Maricardo which will be about 17 years old. I purchased it from Marionville Models in Edinburgh and I understood it was a model designed and produced by Carlos the shop owner. Is this the same model?My model looked very similar to your photograph when it was in one piece. Unfortunately I had an indecent that caused a considerable amount of damage. The wing was broken in half and I have cut the former for the ribs as I will be making a built up wing rather than a foam, purely as I have found it easy to do and as I have no knowledge of foam. Its third down the line on my renovation projects and once complete will post a photo for comparison. I would love to achieve the standard of your model but my skills are limited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alistair Taylor Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Hi I'm building a Maricardo at the moment (or rather, I have been building one on and off for about three years). Ken, could you clarify what the drawing errors are, cos I have hit one or two snags during the building process (besides daughter being born, moving house, F-in-law passing away), and would love a heas up before I go any further and end up with a passable welsh dresser instead of a flying model... cheers AlistairT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Cayton Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I built one of these back in 1977 or 78. It was my first "big" model powered by an Enya 40. I built it as per plan and flew it on three channel - rudder, elevator, motor - with the dihedral, of course. Radio was very expensive then - I had just built the RCM&E proportional gear (when the "E" in RCM&E meant electronics, rather than electric) and could only afford three servos. I remember it flew very well on three channels and was a major step up for me from the 1.5 - 2.5cc R/C models I was flying at the time. I am tempted to try one with an Irvine 53 - I know it will be a great flyer. Mick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Bridgens Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 I am building a Maricardo just now. The fuselage, tail and fin are all finished. The wing is another matter. It is very difficult to build it straight, my plan is to assemble the ribs onto the spars, then pin the T/E onto the board and with the spars supported glue the ribs to the T/E. Then sheet the rear section while still pinned to the board, then do the same with the L/E. The whole wing is very flimsy till you get the sheeting on. I would be interested to hear of any other build sequences. Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted November 25, 2010 Share Posted November 25, 2010 HI all, looking at the Maricardo plan, I see the elevator, rudder, and fin are 1/4 balsa sheet, Would I gain any thing by building these as built up structures, or leave well alone, and carry on as the designer planned. Having read all the good reviews of this model,it may be a case of strength and a quicker build. ps I may have answered my own question. LoL Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnar Schou Olsen Posted November 27, 2010 Share Posted November 27, 2010 Here is some pics of my Maricardo, I changed the fuselage so it looks a bit like a Sukhoi. Tailplane, fin, wing and engine are still in their original posisions as per, Maricardo plans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted November 27, 2010 Share Posted November 27, 2010 Hello Magnar, thanks for answering my query on the Maricardo, also the photos were great and very helpfull. I do like the changes you have made to the model, it does look very much the Sukhoi. Your flying field also looks very nice indeed. What engine have you fitted to the model.? Cheers FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnar Schou Olsen Posted November 28, 2010 Share Posted November 28, 2010 Thanks. The engine is a Just Engines 57. Cowling is from a Great Planes Yak54. Canopy a Great Planes SU-31, and the landing gear from Great Planes U-Can-Do 60. I bought these parts before i started the building, so i could alter the fuselage to fit the parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted November 28, 2010 Share Posted November 28, 2010 So thats how its done. Nice one Magnar, Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Hi all,Maricardo build requires nose ring. Never encounted one before.Do I fit it to prop shaft with small interior diameter, then build balsa cowl around it, then open out interior diam. to plan size .Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 The nose ring is usually thin ply , maybe 1/32 so the balsa sides sand away easily down to the ply shape. It would be easier to make in ply to exact size and glue or double sided tape on another ply washer to fit the shaft. Fit a balsa piece in between to allow clearance for prop & spinner. The balsa can later be cut away easily and sanded off.Edited By kc on 14/12/2010 12:16:29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Hi KC, Thanks for the explanation of the nose ring and the buiding of same. All is now clear. Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 The Maricardo plan requires 37 inch fus. sides. My stock balsa is 36 inches. What would be the best way forward ( no 48inch) Deviate from plan and have the fus 1 inch shorter,? or add the required 1 inch. Due to glue and strengheners this way may end up in adding unwanted weight to the wrond end of the model. Would a model with a shorter fus fly just as well. Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r6dan Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I would just scarf the extra on,maybe cut the 36" stuff to 30" and add 7" one one side and maybe do it different on the other side so the joins aren`t in line with each other,if you know what I mean... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 It is usual to join the fus sides over the ply doubler at the front end. A diagonal joint is usual. But in this instance the fus is strengthened with 1/4 sq longerons at the back so the sheet could be joined there without too much loss of strength. The front is better because of the ply and 1/4 sheet doubler reinforce over the joint.48 inch balsa is easily availble from The Balsa Cabin etc. Edited By kc on 08/01/2011 19:25:39 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Thanks r6dan, and kc,It looks like scarfed joints, at the correct position in the fus, and sticking to correct dimensions of the plan is the order of the day. I suppose modellers used to building much larger models than I, have always come across this little problem, and used similar procedures as a matter of fact. Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Hi all. I have just noticed that The Maricardo has a non type castoring rear wheel as per the plan.. As I nearly always fly from a concrete surfaced run way,would it not be an improvement to try and fit a castoring wheel. Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Cooper Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 This is a comercial wheel fitted to my maricardo.Not a great picture! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly boy3 Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Thanks Tony just what I wanted to know. Picture is fine, no problem. My Maricardo is 3/4 finished before covering with Profilm. If you have some spare time, a picture of the cabin would be of help to me. Thanks FB3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Brodie Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 Re Maricardo. Just starting to make me a set of ribs etc. Can you tell me what diheral I should aim for? Alex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 The plan shows one and a quarter inch under each wing tip, but the article mentions that dihedral has been removed which " increases roll rate."I suppose it depends on flying ability and the type of flying you want to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Cooper Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 I have been flying my Maricardo with zero dihedral, It behaves quite well, after a crash that wrote the wing off (my flying) I am building a new wing, "zero" again, it also makes the construction easier.FB3 I shall get the photo of the cabin for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Cooper Posted January 24, 2011 Share Posted January 24, 2011 FB3Are these of help, I am just rebuilding the wing, the cabin was from the original model which I bought S/hand, the wing bolt fits from the top down, not as the plan up from under the wing,the yellow tube is to guide the screw driver and stop the screw getting lost inside.The dowel alignment was already there from the original build, I just put the new win in place on the fus and offered the cabin to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.