Jump to content

Help with building a depron plane from a balsa plan.


Darran
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have read many threads on here and the internet on building with depron, from some very talented builders. I am planning on having a go myself. A lot of the threads whilst not intentionally I am sure give details on a level that existing builders would understand but not a novice such as me.

For instance I have been looking at building with depron from a balsa plan, and I already know it’s not a straight like for like process nor is it going to be easy but we all start somewhere and I am willing to learn as I go along.

So here’s what might be Some basic questions for starters

Should you stick to the plan in terms of size, for instance the fus is the same dimensions ?

Also when creating a crucifix fus I take it you have to trim the formers and such to take into account the thickness of the depron being used, similarly when making the wing parts.

I may well do a build blog when I start my build as I will have many questions and will require lots of help especially around where it’s necessary to change the build to match the materials.

All help appreciated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


Darran

The biggest issue with Depron compared to balsa is it is only 1/8 the weight and strength for the same section.smile o

So building from an plan intended for balsa you have to know where and how to use more (ie thicker) depron sections and where the balsa original was sufficiently over strength that a direct Depron substitution is possible.

As far as trimming formers to take account of the thickness of the Depron I wouldn't bother. Yes the fuselage may end up slightly 'fatter' but Depron is so light it will still be a lot lighter anyway and the extra size will only add a bit more stiffness.

Wings are a big more difficult as they more highly stressed anyway and depending on their design the highest stress areas are likely to be beyond the capabilities of Depron.

With the right glue (typically UHU POR) Depron can be glued very well to balsa so it is possible to build up a 'composite' structure where a hard balsa is used for things like the highly stressed wing spars with Depron for the ribs and wing skin.

It does however take a bit of experience, coupled with some trial and error, to arrive at a satisfactory compromise but the final result can give in a very 'efficient' structure that is hard to beat for strength to weight.

What plan are you considering building from?

Edited By Simon Chaddock on 04/08/2018 21:50:19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Don Fry on 04/08/2018 21:23:29:

First question, you plan to replace balsa with depron. Are you happy with balsa? Because, if not happy with the structural behaviour of balsa, you are stretching your knowledge base to put depron in the mix.

Don

Building with either material will be a learning curve for me as I have no experience in either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Posted by Simon Chaddock on 04/08/2018 21:46:57:

Darran

The biggest issue with Depron compared to balsa is it is only 1/8 the weight and strength for the same section.smile o

So building from an plan intended for balsa you have to know where and how to use more (ie thicker) depron sections and where the balsa original was sufficiently over strength that a direct Depron substitution is possible.

As far as trimming formers to take account of the thickness of the Depron I wouldn't bother. Yes the fuselage may end up slightly 'fatter' but Depron is so light it will still be a lot lighter anyway and the extra size will only add a bit more stiffness.

Wings are a big more difficult as they more highly stressed anyway and depending on their design the highest stress areas are likely to be beyond the capabilities of Depron.

With the right glue (typically UHU POR) Depron can be glued very well to balsa so it is possible to build up a 'composite' structure where a hard balsa is used for things like the highly stressed wing spars with Depron for the ribs and wing skin.

It does however take a bit of experience, coupled with some trial and error, to arrive at a satisfactory compromise but the final result can give in a very 'efficient' structure that is hard to beat for strength to weight.

What plan are you considering building from?

Edited By Simon Chaddock on 04/08/2018 21:50:19

Simon, thanks for that.

I am not sure what plan to use yet. I have a number ranging from small low wing models, al the way to a 72 inch TN Dakota.

Whatever I build will be a steep learning curve, if I didn’t take into account the thickness of the depron, would I not then have to adjust the wings accordingly, let’s say my chosen model as a Dakota for instance the body would then be 6mm wider at least would this not make some difference in wing fitting etc. 

 

Edited By Darran on 04/08/2018 22:27:18

Edited By Darran on 04/08/2018 22:34:23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by RC Plane Flyer on 04/08/2018 21:31:47:

Hi Darren. Why not try a depron model first to learn the ins and outs of it's structure and joining instructions. If I could suggest something like the Eurofighter as on thh BMFA web pages and fly etc and the move up to your own designs or balsa equivilants

Hey, I didn’t know these things existed, not been on the BFMA site much.

I assume you meant this one

**LINK**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Darran. If you get into another forum called rcgroups and go into forums then "foamies scratch built" you will find a host of info regarding your original request and far more. Our friends over the pond are into this in a bigger way than us in UK I think. Cheers. PS in this forum you will also find some great stuff called pipe laggers, designed by the late and great Tom Wright. 

Edited By fly boy3 on 04/08/2018 23:48:34

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darran

Yes you might have to adjust hings to make then fit but how much does rather depend on the size of the model and the thickness of the Depron. By changing the building material you are going to have to get used to building things to 'fit' rather than exactly following the plan construction detail..

Whilst 6 mm Depron may be suitable for formers and possibly wing ribs actually covering the plane in it would be rather difficult. Does a sheet covered balsa plane use the same thickness wood everywhere? True Depron is available in 6, 3 and 2 mm thick sheets.

I haven't built a Dakota in Depron but this Bombardier Q400 is all 3 mm except for balsa spars in the wing, fin and tail plane along with 1/16 ply bulkheads for the motor mounts.

Paint 3 (outdoors)

Even with a proven plan I can only stress how unwise it would be to attempt anything like this as a first Depron build.

I started off some 5 years ago building just a simple Depron 'copy' wing to go on an existing RTF fuselage.

The weight saving using Depron over the original solid foam wing considerably improved its performance to the point the wing eventually failed but I still fly the second 'improved' version on the same, now even more battered, RTF fuselage! wink 2

Low set tailplane

Edited By Simon Chaddock on 05/08/2018 00:15:50

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darren, you have probably seen but there are some free download plans on the Flite-Test site for some quick build models, albeit in foam board rather than depron. In the US foam board is available as 'Dollar board' from Home Depot etc, but ten times the price in the UK! These models would probably build with depron no problem, even if they took a bit longer to put together.

If you click on a model, the PDF download links are at the bottom of the page after all the build videos.

Edited By Piers Bowlan on 06/08/2018 04:45:05

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...