winchweight Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Looks repairable to me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark S Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Minor scratch The Lipo looks a little bent though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuey Posted October 5, 2008 Author Share Posted October 5, 2008 I have been told the power system should fit in an Alfa EDF model, or you can buy another F-16 airframe for around £35 if it is finished... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott cuppello Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 The motor upgrade for 3s is the DF210-9GL motor, 5200kv, however, it's really worth going 4s using the DF210-8XL motor, 4800kv.......so reliable, especially if you fit the 20mm heatsink as advised, just remember, if you are going to use 4s on this airframe, no bigger than 1800mAh unless you are prepared to dig out the rear of the canopy [not a big job, but you will need to get rid of the little canopy hatch and use magnets].....but it flies so much better on the lighter airframe, with little difference in flight times, this airframe is worth the mod! We do a replacement complete airframe for £34.99. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Halton Posted October 9, 2008 Share Posted October 9, 2008 Shaun, love that Israeli scheme, exactly what I'm planning to do with mine., looks fantastic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winchweight Posted October 10, 2008 Share Posted October 10, 2008 Have to say I was pleased as punch. I will be doing another in the same scheme. I'd like to get this eventuallyThis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 I had two f16s from you scott, when cumbria electric flight. I had the 4 cell set up but both planes crashed as a result of terrible glitching. I tried two receivers, a JR 77S PCM which gltched the worst, and the corona dual conversion which wasn't quite as bad. Generally ok on half throttle but full throttle very bad. a) how can I stop this as I surely can't be the only person to have suffered thisb) I have noticed on Micron site that I can buy lttle ferrite rings. Would these make any difference.c) how is the motor in the 3 cell set up you supply an upgrade form the one supplied with the phase 3 ripmax one. Yours...disillusioned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott cuppello Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 Well Pete, it must be said that 2.4ghz was a prayer answered for EDF fliers, I am very, very suprised however at so many problems with JR PCM, so yes, ferrite rings will be a really good start. The Phase 3 motor is, I'm very sure, lower kv than our 3s version, which is 5100kv. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark S Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 Pete, how are running your aerial? I had glitching with my F16 on 35Mhz when I ran my aerial along the fuselage but that all went away when I ran it out along the leading edge of the wing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 I had it just flapping in the wind, out of the top of the canopy. I've decided to have another crack at this with a 3 cell set up, but still debating between the ripmax standard with esc included or the BRC one, where the esc is extra. I was going to have a go at the fibreglass F16 from foamy jets but at over £200 without lipo I thought the investment was too much if it was to glitch about around the sky.Unfortunately 2.4 Gig is not an option. All my other planes have no problem on 35 meg and there is never an issue over frequencies at our site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuey Posted October 17, 2008 Author Share Posted October 17, 2008 I had bad glitching with the aerial along the fuz, was better when taped along the leading edge as advised by motors and rotors. I have just got a Spektrum module for my Futaba FF9, they are on special offer with a few shops for £125 with the 9 channel receiver!! Will get the AR6100 receiver to go in my F-16, that will hopefully cure the scary random glitching issues Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott cuppello Posted October 17, 2008 Share Posted October 17, 2008 Pete, you must still have all your power train, why not just get an airframe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Nah, I got rid of it all in a moment of very pissed off ness...bl00dy edfs etc etc. some months ago. But I thought I'd have another go now on a less frantic set up and use some ferrite rings, which I didn't know about at the time. The plane flew fine on half power it was only a real problem on full power, so I'm thinking that a 3 cell / less aggressive set up might be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott cuppello Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Ah, ok, shame......if that's the case, a composite F-16 is not the way to go! If you really want to do EDF....and I can see why....why not invest in a DX5 just for EDF? I mean, £70 - ish is a lot less money than a wrecked/binned F-16 x 2.....then you can fly any EDF you like basically! At least you are not having to replace 35mghz in all the other models? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myron Beaumont Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Pete I know EXACTLY how you feel 'cos I'm in more or less the same position . Personally I shall "cut my losses "& swap or sell all my lekktrik stuff ( about £250 's worth) for a smallish ( 30 to 60'ish ) 4 stroke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 OK, a dx 5 seems a bit pointless as it's one model, non computer (I'm assuming). I have a JR 2610 and would want a straight replacement as I don't need 7 channels. Is the DX 6i the same as my 2610 and what is the difference between this and the dx7. Seems a huge price difference for one more channel. If the DX6i is a direct repalcement for my 2610 then it could be a possibility. What about receivers. They seem pricey aswell. Can you get after market ones cheaper than the Spektrum ones. I understand that there are two receivers with little sticky out bits. How do you fit these into a small foamy f16, there os little space as there is for a mini 35meg receiver.Cheers for any advice... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark S Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 I flew my F-16 today for the first time on a Spektrum setup. I'm using the DX6i with the 6200 receiver and it was flawless. It's the first time I have flown a plane at our field with absolutely no glitching at all, all morning I mounted the mini-receiver right up front with the aerials pointing outwards through the fuse and the main receiver 1 inch behind it at 90 degrees to the mini. Setting up the DX6i is quite easy once you're familiar with the menus but one thing you may have to do is move the control rods out on the servo arms as the elevon setting is fixed at 50% unlike my Futaba 6EX which is adjustable from 100%. I'll still use my 35Mhz gear on my cheap planes as the receivers are so cheap but 2.4Ghz is definately the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 I can't see how the aerials fit in the small space of the f16. Surely they must poke out of the polystyrene fuzz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark S Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 Actually with the small receiver mounted up front, the aerial width is exactly the same as the fuse so they don't stick out but you have to make holes for the aerials to sit in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott cuppello Posted October 18, 2008 Share Posted October 18, 2008 The DX6i IS better value for money in my opinion, and 2.4ghz technology is here to stay....go on Pete.....it's worth it. The recievers are getting cheaper, the new AR500 is remarkable vale for money, do what the rest of us did....make a slow transition from 35mghz. It's the only way to go for EDF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Budd Posted October 20, 2008 Share Posted October 20, 2008 mmmmmmmmm??The DX6i has the spec I need but it's like a toy and has no charger and 4 cells. The DX7 is the same as my 2610...nicely balanced with a better quality feel. Could afford one but would want the other. If I was to buy one then it would have to be a long term purchase. Maybe see what santa can afford or look out for a used one. Thanks for the tips allPete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winchweight Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 All my edfs are flown with AR6100 rx and they fit perfectly into all of them. I had tried in vain to get 35mhz to work with leccy's, but in the long run I wish I'd just gone straight for 2.4. It saves all the aggro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julian Thacker Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Or go with a Schulze 535 rx. I fly my Phase 3 F16 on that with no glitches at all. The aeriel exits the canopy right by the rx and then is taped along the length of the fuselage. I fly a wide range of electric models, including EDF and fast 400 pylon racers on Schulze and Multiplex IPD rxs with no problems at all. The latter really require everything crammed in close together (motor, ESC, battery, elevator and aileron servos and rx) and operate at high power - a glitch on a VIP would almost certainly be fatal! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winchweight Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 Julian Thacker wrote (see)Or go with a Schulze 535 rx. I fly my Phase 3 F16 on that with no glitches at all. The aeriel exits the canopy right by the rx and then is taped along the length of the fuselage. I fly a wide range of electric models, including EDF and fast 400 pylon racers on Schulze and Multiplex IPD rxs with no problems at all. The latter really require everything crammed in close together (motor, ESC, battery, elevator and aileron servos and rx) and operate at high power - a glitch on a VIP would almost certainly be fatal!I have a spare Schulze 535 rx if you want to try one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J B Posted October 21, 2008 Share Posted October 21, 2008 For my sins I use a Al's Hobbies E-Sky 6ch rx priced at £7.50 in my F16 right up at the front with the ariel out of the side and down the wing. There is a known hot spot where I fly so I keep out of it and have no trouble, it certainly make me smile when I fly it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.