ASH.

To answer the OP's question.. I aspire to have all my models in tip top condition and up and running.. so when I open the hangar I go WOW! What shall I fly today?

Glyn It will happen. We modeller are just natural hoarders, we accumulate many items over time.. it's the nature of the hobby. But just like squirrels we often forget where we put things. That's my biggest bug bear.. not being able to find something when I need it most, that I know I have but just can't put my hands on. Why does that happen!? At times it feels like the Universe is in a conspiracy. Glyn, I suggest you only buy things you need when you need then.. it's too easy to buy unnecessary items early on. I adopt the KISS principle. Ash

David, I agree with what Jon says. The APC prop is very efficient compared to MA or Graupner, which flex badly and make a terrible racket. You can actually see the tips of these props flex back and forth when revving up and down. You can try the APC wide blade 15x4W or 16x4W etc. They are known as fun fly but will have tonnes of thrust to put all that torque to good use and fly the Chipmunk in a scale like manner. Also, you could paint the tips white for aesthetics. Wooden props are a another alternative but again not as efficient. Ash   Edited By ASH. on 18/01/2016 23:05:14

"This is a forum full of sideways thinking bodgers." - shouldn't that read codgers! Our days are numbered.. the end is nigh!

Yes, it may be an old chestnut but MR's do put model flying at risk, no matter how small that risk. That is undeniable. And yet we must welcome it in the name of progress. Progress to a hobby I have great passion for.

Posted by Dai Fledermaus on 12/01/2016 14:46:41: These are my last words on the subject, because we need to agree to disagree at the end of the day and no one is going to take note of my " narrow minded prejudice" anyway However, in case you think my concerns over the future legislation controlling the use of MR's is overstated, then this is what we should be aware of LINK As we know, any Radio controlled craft, fixed wing or otherwise can be turned into a flying bomb and it doesn't matter if the threat is real or imagined, legislators need little excuse to erode our freedoms. Those of us who fly from Club sites probably need not concern themselves too much, but the people who fly in unregulated spaces like parks or worse still sensitive areas like those near Airports or Government establishments, might find their wings clipped big time. MR's are so widely available now anyone without any thought can buy one and rush out and fly it wherever they can with no thought for anyone else or the wider implications of what they're doing. Sooner rather than later, I fear, Government will react to this. Hear hear! And we are told to embrace this as it's aeromodelling!

Futaba S3305 (9kg) metal geared for rudder, Futaba S3010 (6.5kg) on elevator. Futaba S3001s everywhere else. That's what I have planned for my 1/5 scale chipmunk. Could have S3010s on flaps. The S3305 does need a metal servo arm.

I prefer to fly without wearing goggles or looking at a screen. And, I would hate to traipse a laptop to the field everytime!

Ryan, if it's the 55" then the 70 should be a perfect match. The engine may need more tuning for better rpm, or if new need several more tanks run through it before it loosen up and comes on in power. Also depends on fuel used and prop size. What engine is it? For take-off use half flaps.

Are we still droning on.. The reason why they would be boring is because not much time, effort or emotional investment is made to get them flying.. rather like plug &play or any other toy bought off the shelf. They appeal to same people who are in awe of the lastest tech gizmo. The satisfaction is very short lived!

Geoffrey, I like your taste. I've always fancied the Calamato and it was a serious contender for my first low winger. I would say go for it, get the 60 size one, if, you are okay about writing it off, because chances are you will. Or, you could just fly high and play safe. Low wing trainers have a flat bottomed wing to aid stability but still perform good aeros. I do agree with what Percy says though "Until greater confidence is built up, it's probably better to spend less on individual models." Seagull make excellent ic models, solid and good value for money. The Seagull Challenger looks good, but on this one the covering is not Oracover(?). TJD has it for £125. Kyosho model coverings are definitely not oracover.

Posted by Slopetrashuk on 08/01/2016 18:56:24: The mag is about radio controlled models. It used to have boats in it for hecks sake. Maybe you'll be into whatever the next big thing turns out to be and then you'll be whining that there is not enough of whatever it is in there. Andy There's more than enough in 'fixed wing' to keep me going.. no need to look elsewhere! Master the discipline you're in rather than change out of boredom.   Edited By ASH. on 08/01/2016 19:20:16

I'm with Myron on this one.. I too am 'old fashioned', but not that old! I also like what Andrew Ray suggests "we will be able to subscribe to a content package that suits our tastes, or even tailor the content by just ticking the relevant boxes and paying for what we want." I have been a subscriber to this mag for some years now and rarely find much that interests me. I am thinking of cancelling because electric, quad/mr and FPV have no interest for me. There are thousands of magazine publications out there catering for all sorts of special interests, surely there must be one or two on quadcopters/fpv etc? If not, then that's a money spinner in the waiting. I got my 15yr old nephew into RC flying a few years ago, alas, he's into drones/ fpv now (to my dismay) and totally obsessed by them. I think it's an interest to a younger generation who are computer native and have been brought up on the instant fix solution. Ash.

Hello Kim The Luscombe Silvare is an excellent choice, a beautiful aeroplane and one of my favourite. I had the Keil Kraft model many years ago and have for some time hankered for an RC one. There's some good videos on youtube of the full size, one performing a slow one wheel touch and go! I was surprised how dimunitive the plane is when viewed up close. It has a very short nose so the heavier the engine the better. A big old Enya or OS would be the best bet. And bigger is better, so I would go for 63" or upscale to 72", it will be more stable in wind and have more presence. The Mike Lovell 80" version kc recommends sounds ideal. Kim, I think what you're doing is a great tribute to you father and wish you the best of luck. Will be following closely. Ash     Edited By ASH. on 07/01/2016 18:21:48

Jon, thank you so much - for clarifying all that.

Frank, Thank-you for explaining that so well, fully understood now. This site has people with a wealth of knowledge. Can the power/pressure drop be offset by a high cam? Jon, In your B/W drawing the tank looks quite small in comparison to engine and fuselage. In your other picture it works but only because of the deep fuselage the Stampe has. I just feel this carb height design quirk needs too careful a consideration in every scale application. I try to live by the KISS principle these days. Ash

Jon, I will move the tank to the floor if need be, that's not the problem. The carb will still be lower, that's the problem! I won't put up with siphoning - a problem that can be got around by looping fuel line above tank height in engine bay.. but we shouldn't have to resort to all this. My Saitos are very powerful and faultlessly reliable. Frank, why is that an edge? Space Cadet, it ain't about fixing, it's about fine tuning and perfecting.. something we ic aero modellers all love to do. Edited By ASH. on 05/01/2016 17:36:06

No, I think it will only work if a smooth finish is achieved first with a few coats of Clearcoat on the Solartex. You will then have to go over trimline with clearcoat to seal. I find the trimline comes off too easily with little heat. I personally would mask and hand paint coachlines with Solarlac paint then seal. Ash

Jon, my only concern with Laser engines is the position of carb in relation to mounting lugs/crankshaft. When mounted normally (inverted) the carb is always going to be lower than tank centreline and cause the usual expected problems. And no, I will not install pump/regulator just to get round this. So, can you not modify your engines in future and get the carb to sit lower, in perfect position. Then Laser will be a serious contender with other top marques for me. I do have an almost new 70 in my collection (had to have one) which I look forward to using one day. I am sure all the fuss about Lasers' will be justified. They do look beautiful! Ash.

Sorry Chris, the model looks nice but I would not consider a foamy nor an electric. And at that span it would get thrown about in anything but the most lighest of breeze. Much like my PZ models do. So not for me thanks. I'm looking for a 50 size F3A model, balsa and ply with proper oracover covering made for IC. Around the150 mark. Too much to ask? None on the market over here. Many in the US. Why is that?? If they were made available then I'm sure it would help introduce many more of us into the patternship fold. Happy Christmas all Ash.Edited By ASH. on 24/12/2015 23:38:09

Jon, can you please elaborate on how ".. the petrol delivers power differently to glow fuel."

Not another poll!!! How much data do you need!?! Google, Twitter and many others collate information on us all the time which is viewed on by "big brother" - the Services. Now I'm not saying anything on this site is that important that it needs to be spied on but I do question motives in all of this.

Subscribed. Good subject Tim, I'm interested to know of the quality, fit and finish and your overall view when it flys. WM models are not too common on here. I would advise you seal all edges of covering with Solarfilm Clearcoat. The covering is not Oracover. Like you Tim I believe in proper strenghtening and had thought of using fibreglass and laminating epoxy inside a model where the wood is suspect. But I also have to remember not to pile on the ounces. Enjoy the build. Ash

Thanks Jon, you've given me something else to think about.. it does seem logical. An engine with loading decreased (@ same throttle position) will run faster therefore draw in more fuel and run richer.. something I had not considered before. Personally, I believe prop unloading only happens in straight & level flight or a dive, not when climbing in any way. And usually at WOT. A 2 stroke (esp inverted) is more prone to flame-out due to the plug being doused by incoming cold fuel/air. A hot 4 stroke plug cures that with the only side effect being possible pre-ignition/detonation. Inverted mounts also need a leaner low end. I wonder what the OP makes of all this.

Err.. not familiar with DX6i. It may be programmable for 2 stage flaps (ideally on 3 pos switch) which is what you want. If not possible - in any way, then I suggest using max flaps down for landing only, 30 degrees minimum. The Super Tucano looks like it's quite slippery and will come in hot.. esp at 11lbs so flaps will help a lot. Some good forum threads on RCU of this model.