Jump to content

Airspeed Courier


Tim Hooper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi John,
 
Thanks for the offer - I'm sure that will be good for both of us and for the 'Airspeed Courier lurkers' out there waiting to start their Courier project too!.
 
Looks like we can't be absolutely certain but that's what 'building' is all about isn't it?
 
Maybe Tim will be along soon and put us right................................................................
 
Timbo are you there!?
 
Terry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


Posted by John Roberts 9 on 15/12/2011 18:21:33:

 
It seems to me that I should build up the wing but intially omit R5. I then cut the wing and rejoin it at the correct dihedral (using the wooden jig) and install R5 & the ply brace B3. Next I sort out the boxing-in etc for the retracts and fix the lower wing skins. Finally I set the washout (again using the wooden jig) by fixing the top wing skins & gussets etc.

Bang on, John!
 
I've just browsed the magazine article, and it is a little unclear due to its layout The bit you want is on top centre of page 72, almost hidden in a photograph! Sorry about that.
 
So the panels are joined together, butt joining the spars. Then add the dihedral braces, followed by R5 and R5A.
 
Hope this helps!
 
Umm...you guys will be posting pictures of your builds, now won't you?
 
tim
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi Tim
 
Thanks very much for the clarification , much appreciated.
 
I think your wording was fine Tim, its just been a few years since I built anything so I was just being a bit cautious rather than rushing in and botching the job.
 
I will try and post a few shots of the build & the completed article..........................although if it turns out looking like a dogs breakfast (due to my inept building skills) I will deny I ever said that !!
 
Thanks again.
Cheers,
John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Tim,
 
Do you have any photos showing your servo installation in the wings please?
 
The appearance you have achieved looks very elegant with just the servo control arm peeking out of the lower wing surface.
 
I assume the servo must be on its side inside the wing but how did you manage to do this and still make the two mounting screws and the control arm screw accessible?
 
I could mount the servo in the conventional fashion (i.e. vertical rather than horizontal) but the this would leave more of the servo exposed beneath the wing. It would work perfectly well but is less aesthetically pleasing.
 
Thanks for any help you can offer
 
Cheers & Happy New Year,
John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John,
 
The method I've is very common these days. The plate you can see is fitted with wooden blocks on its reverse side, and the servo is screwed to these blocks (with its output arm protruding through the slot). The plate is then itself screwed to the wing structure.
 
Stupidly I didn't take any pics .......
 
tim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,
 
Is anyone building from the free plan? Stupidly for once I did not check it with dividers first but the tailplane leading edge has turned out 2cm wider than the fuselage at f4 and all the ribs needed cutting shorter to fit the outline of the wing. I have seen the fantastic way Tim finished his but there is no way I can get a correct leading edge profile for a Clark ym 15 from f5 inboard. useing the specified strip. I do wish plans would carry a datumn so one could check for print errors.
 
Billy T, I did not quite trust bolting my moter to the ply so I bolted the standard crucifix mount , useing socket headed allen bolts and locknuts and lashings of epoxy to the back of f1 as it was fitted to the nose, the ply was drilled through 4.5 mm at the 4 motor locations so the standard countersunk motor screws would just bear on the alloy mount.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah! This is a standard problem with plans. The designer sends in the plan that he built from and that he knows is accurate but by the time it has been scanned, gone to the draftsman who rearrranges it, been sent back to the magazine and is printed it is all over the place.
 
I proofed my Legrand Simon plans TWICE and there were STILL errors.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Peter Miller on 06/01/2012 08:30:10:
Ah! This is a standard problem with plans. The designer sends in the plan that he built from and that he knows is accurate.........
 
 
Well, I submit a hand-crayoned piece of crumpled up loo roll.......
 
I've built from quite a few plans in the past, and I've always assumed that the plans were just guide really - not a definitive source of dimensional accuracy.
 
A you say, Peter, given that the pencilled plans are pssed to a CAD guru (who may or may not be an aeromodeller), I'm generally very happy with the way they turn out - within their obvious limitations.
 
Another publisher (not RCM+E) once published a design of mine. A beautiful job, except that the whole airframe was enlarged by 17% over size. Sure the model would be buildable, but all the stated dimensions would be wrong, the stated power train would be at the lower limits, and the AUW would be comensurately askew. All completely out of the authors control!
 
What has surprised me since I started this designing nonsense, is just how many folk assume that the stated method of construction is the only way that will work, whereas just about anything can be changed to suit the builders needs.
 
tim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think that this reoccurring plan issue needs putting into perspective.
 
The plans are very good given the limited space for printing them.
 
Paper is not stable, so absolute accuracy will not be achieved on paper, maybe drawing film.
 
Cad drawing files will be as accurate as the inputer. Draughtsman drawn images will almost certainly be 100% accurate, be the line width, miscalculated/measured dimension.
 
In this vain you can go on for ever.
 
Most of us cannot even build remotely a so called accurate model, again for similar reasons.
 
There is always more than one way of skinning a cat, and designers will often be giving guidance, rather than absolute right way.
 
The drawings and accuracy are generally very good, occasional errors will occur, but what is an error is a matter of opinion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Hi Tim,
 
Absolutly love the model It has been a while since i have flown but try to keep active building. Cant wait to get started on this model.
 
Can i pick your brains first though. The glazing of the canopy, and the windows. Are they hard to do? Would you have any pointers or suggestions for me, cause i fall behind when it comes to making the windows.
 
Also as this is my first electric model build, could you advise where i might get the landing gear.
 
Thanks in advance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob,
 
The glazing is quite straight-forward. Lots of little pieces of acetate, that's all. The trick is not to try and do it all in one go, but stage it over a couple of days, to allow the canopy glue to dry overnight before moving on to the next pane.
 
I'm pretty sure I detailed the glazing earlier in this thread. There's a couple of guys also building Couriers in the Kit reviews section here. They haven't reached the glazing yet, but it won't be long!
 
 
The retracts are E-Flites own, as distributed by Horizon Hobbies in the UK. Most model shops will easily be able to get a pair of mainlegs to order.
 
tim
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi All,

This will be my third balsa scratch build (Funterceptor, Zulu ET and now the Courier). I love the planes you select to model Tim, they are always a bit quirky and unusual. I chose the Courier because I think its not too complicated for me (I hope!) and looks cool (very 30's art deco) plus the retracts add an extra bit of fun.

I have just started cutting the wing ribs for the courier and I have a two questions and a request:

1. Is there any reason why the wing can't be built in three parts rather than built as one part and cut into three? Space is an issue and it would be easier for me to build it in three parts.

2. Ribs 4 and 5 have a lite ply section that re-enforces the balsa rib. Is the balsa rib cut as one complete rib or in two parts (front and rear)? The plans show them in two parts but on the photos it looks like they could be one balsa rib with the lite ply glued to the front of the rib.

3. Finally the request: Does anyone have any video of a courier in flight? Nothing like a bit of video to up the motivation.

 

Edited By Mike Robey on 17/12/2012 03:05:41

Edited By Mike Robey on 17/12/2012 03:06:07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI Mike!

Thanks for choosing the Courier as your next project!teeth 2

Thinking back, there's no real reason why you shouldn't build the wing in three sections. I think I did it as one-piece as it ensures that the spars line up with each other.

2. I'll have to dig out the plan and have a look, so bear with me, OK? Either way it's not a biggie.

3. Sadly, I don't have a video. I have enough trouble getting photos, never mind videos...

tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tim, I appreciate the info about the ribs when you have time to check the plans.

Building the wings in three parts will make it way easier for me from the perspective of space and not annoying the rest of my family. I wanted to be sure I wasn't missing anything by going that way. I take your point about the spars lining up, I'll be careful and hopefully they will line up nicely anyway.

I also take your point about video. I sometimes think its harder to video a model in flight than fly the damn thing! My hope was that, going by the forum participants, there must be at least 3 or 4 couriers out there by now so maybe someone got some video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...