Bob Black Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 Hi to you all and a Very Merry Christmas Hope this is the correct section on the forum On several plans particularly vintage type mobels it advocates ie. "400 geared motor" or similarI have searched dozzens of sites for geared motor, including this one, but come up blank is this something one has to machine oneself or am I missing something ( I dont have access to a lathe) Thank and RegardsBob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Grigg Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 I dont think so Bob,Ive purchased selections of old stuff and found motors with gearboxes on them,quite simple set up of just 2 gears to reduce the prop speed.Probably with the advent of brushless and speed controllers not needed so much because you can control the speed much better now and there is such a vast selection of motors and controllers now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Black Posted December 23, 2010 Author Share Posted December 23, 2010 Thanks for quictk reply Stephen It could probable be done by choice of prop as well as the ESP, simple Eh! Thats me Thanks again Regards Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Grigg Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 hu bob I tend to chat to Galaxy or BRC they no all the stuff and are very helpfull mind you know one is as knowledgeable as out Timbo.If you put on here your plan and requirement he"ll come back with all you need to know.Weight of the model type of model etc all helps him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 I thought the purpose of the gearbox was to allow a small high reving motor to turn a larger prop which it could not do on its own?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Hafner Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 As far as i'm aware the you're right there Hamish, the reason being that the current draw is lower so we get to fly longer , of course its not so much of an issue these days with LiPos and better motors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Mackey Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 A half decent brushless motor of the right Kv will be far better ( and likely cheaper these days ) than a geared brushed setup.Happy to advise if you post details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GONZO Posted December 23, 2010 Share Posted December 23, 2010 True Hamish but that was mainly for brushed motors in the past. With the advent of brushless outrunner motors giving good torque from physically small motors brushed motors and a gearbox are, I would suggest, a redundant technology for general plane flying. As 'Timbo' would say 'brushes are for floors!' Thats not to say that in a limited specialist field geared inrunner brushless motors are not used. Bob, put a request in to Timbo quoting the plane specifications and I am sure he will give you a range of modern alternatives to the specified '400' with gearbox power source. Or, you could consult the electric flight guides on this forum and have a go at working a system out for yourself and then getting the OK from the master. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 Bob a typical brushed 400 motor had a Kv (rpm per volt) of over 2,000, and you'd use something like a 4.75 x 4.75 prop which would be no good for a vintage model if it wasn't geared down. With brushless outrunner you can get them in a whole range of KV's to suit the application. If you know the weight of the model in question it would be pretty easy to suggest a motor, for a vintage model something with 80 watts per pound (model weight) would be maore thans required. I replaced the 400 direct drive motors on my Twin Star with these way more power than the 400s they replaced Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erfolg Posted December 24, 2010 Share Posted December 24, 2010 I have in principal to agree with the comments, which run along the lines, "put in an lowish Kv Outrunner". As many others I have used various gearboxes in the past. The low cost types for 400/480 and 600 work, at the expense of overall efficiency. Although promising much, they deliver little. As the increased efficiency of a large diameter propeller is balanced against the inefficiency of the gearbox. It is always worth remembering that the useful power into a brushed 400 is only about 80w. Whereas the outrunner can easily take 120-300w for a similar overall package size. The type of gearbox that are used with inrunner brushless, are precision engineered units and have very good efficiency levels. However the issue then becomes one of pinion bore diameter and fits and how the motor gearbox are assembled. This set up is excellent, but the financial cost is generally horrendous, compared with an Outrunner. The only real advantage is the small diameter of the set up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Black Posted December 25, 2010 Author Share Posted December 25, 2010 Hi and thanks Guys Sorry for slow reply but not been able to get to computer ( something to do with something I think called Christmas ) The plan I was concidering for is the "Pix-e major" as in Dec issue of RCM&EI have several smallish motor set-ups that should do nicely Cheers Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.