Michael Ramsay-Fraser

Posted by Ron Gray on 09/09/2020 08:44:08: Posted by EarlyBird on 09/09/2020 06:43:49: I’m sure that Boris will make it really clear. That'll be a first, then!

On the subject of 'us' oldies, I don't know if anyone picked up on this but there was some interesting research out of China and France concerning smokers. Apparently, in both countries the percentage of smokers catching Coronavirus in comparison to the percentage of smokers in the population was approx 50%. In China 26% of the population smoke but only 13% of those contracting Coronavirus were smokers. Similar results from France although both percentages were lower. Downside is that if you're a smoker and DO catch Coronavirus your chances are slim. Such is the interest that the French are trialing Nicotine patches. The theory is that the ACE receptors that Coronavirus attaches to are the same receptors that nicotine attach to and that the nicotine may block (partially) the Coronavirus. As a gentleman of a certain age, I was a smoker for most of my earlier years. Gave up ciggies for cigars and now vape. I wonder what percentage of forum members smoke/vape being as we tend to be of that dangerous 'certain age'.

Posted by Bob Cotsford on 03/05/2020 12:43:12: Posted by leccyflyer on 03/05/2020 12:31:28: The thread is dealing with very real issues which affect model flying..The desire to constantly close down threads simply because some people don;t want to read them should be resisted.I don;t know about anyone else but if I make an on topic post on a thread discussing a serious issue I don;t want that thread shut down because someone else makes an off topic post. The thread should continue to discuss the topic at hand, which is when we can expect to get back to model flying again. Unfortunately it has (no surprise) strayed into politics in a good number of posts. Nothing to do with when we go flying again. I agree, "The thread should continue to discuss the topic at hand, which is when we can expect to get back to model flying again". On that very subject, when the lockdown was just announced, I recall reading posts from a (by me) well respected and influencial member of this forum suggesting he was going to achieve his allotted exercise time by mowing his local strip. To say it left me disappointed in his attitude in the face of a rapidly growing crisis was a major understatement. Lets be realistic, there will be no opportunity for anyone to consider their former leisure activities as being appropriate in any any circumstances any time soon. Unless, of course, it involves isolating oneself. Even then, it's difficult to justify. I enjoy hill walking, what happens if I take a fall and need to call Mountain Rescue. You drive to a flying site and some fool pulls out in front of you. Police, Fire & Ambulance have to attend. We have to be realistic, this is not going to change for a VERY long time.

I disagree Paul. This isn't about politics as in right v left, it's about our governments ability (or lack of it) to prepare for an event such as the one we are experiencing atm. I blamed the Conservative government for failing to implement the recommendations of Exercise Cygnus but I really doubt a Labour government would have done any better. The debate should be about the priorities we, as citizens should expect our government to deliver on our behalf and the likes of health and education should be top priority, not the likes of HS2, Trident, Crossrail and all the other billions of expenditure programs. If there is anything left after we prioritise the likes of health & education then, fine, spend what you can on vanity projects.

What's the better alternative? 30,000 + deaths and rising? The simple fact is, as pointed out above, other governments around the world have been better prepared in terms of PPE and ventilators (along with support services) than we have. The fact that the recommendations of Exercise Cygnus weren't adopted was down to the austerity cuts introduced by the Conservative government.

If anyone is under any false assumptions about how inept the government has been in this matter please read about Exercise Cygnus carried out in 2016. This exercise revealed how under prepared the NHS would be in the event of a pandemic. Ventilators, PPE shortages and NHS overwhelmed within days was the outcome. Recommendations were made. Did the government take action? Watch the death figures rise and guess the answer. Government doing their best? Don't make me laugh.

Holding players in at rucks is aggressive defending? Don't think so. Hence the penalty against Farrell. I think the Itoji offence was missed by the officials. God knows how because he was holding 2 Irish players back. True, the tackle on May might have been considered differently. All in all, England did deserve to win, probably by a bigger margin.

Ireland all at sea but England did outclass them Having said that, Itoje and Farrell should both have been given a yellow card.

My son's had a ride in one of those (a Typhoon, that is). And, yes, he was sick. Boy, was I jealous. Not the being sick part obviously.

Don, you're quite correct. I'd be happy to see any Nh team bring the cup home and, yes, even England. Martin, apologies. You're correct too. I should have said runners up medals. Still think the attitude was wrong though as was the teams 'stunt' before the AB game and rightly fined for it. However, please don't assume I'm an 'average punter'. I doubt you know anything about my involvement with the game as I don't know anything about yours. The day rugby players start acting like petulant, overpaid footballers is the day I give up being involved with the game.

Posted by john stones 1 on 02/11/2019 17:07:09: Not into the digs. You show disrespect with the here's where it went wrong comments, it went wrong because the Boks played better in every position, and gave a World Champions performance, plan B doesn't exist when the opponent plays that well, look back 1 week, where was the A.Bs plan B ? Lads are down because they gave everything for 4 years, I forgive em a bit of sulking, not as if the rest of our Countries set much of an example of late is it ? Here's a dog, looks a bit down, you can kick it if you like. You done your online tests yet and ready to register. Not into digs? "not as if the rest of our Countries set much of an example of late is it ?" Pot, kettle, black etc. Next time I won't bother supporting England. And, no. I haven't

I also feel it was a bit disrespectful to refuse/take off losers medals. Not a good example to kids looking up to their heroes.

Token Scotsman here. Bit disappointed that England lost if only for the desire to see the cup come to the NH for a change. However, I feel England continue to suffer from a problem I feel they've had for a long time and that is the inability to execute a plan B when things start to go wrong. If the game plan works, they're amongst the best in the world but when things start to go awry there seems to some sort of mental blockage (the Calcutta cup comes to mind). Having said that, when your scrum is so comprehensively dominated, it's always going to be an uphill struggle. Just a pity they couldn't save their best game for last.

Sadly, it looks to be all over for our Celtic cousins (just as the AB's score another try). Or not, just ruled forward. Hope England have more than just one good game in them.

As a Scotsman, this is really hard to say.....but best of luck to England next weekend. However, if you do win, PLEASE don't bang on about it for the next 12 years.

Try getting rid of 'no arms' Farrell for a start.

Anger got the better of me. 'Skies'

Liz Kershaw on Sky News. 'Ban all drones from UK skys!' And I was told to grow up when I suggested media over reaction??

Posted by Adrian Smith 1 on 20/12/2018 19:05:01: Don & Michael. I really don't think here is the place to be airing petty prejudices against a national newspaper. Time grow up I think. And no I don't read the Mail. No need to be offensive. I only used the Daily Mail as an example of the likely tabloid exaggeration that's bound to be in most of the papers tomorrow. I think it's inevitable that a great deal of assumptions will be made, most of it provided by 'experts' that probably don't know one side of a drone from the other.

Expect Daily Mail rhetoric to go into overdrive. 'Enemies of the State' perhaps?

Where's my body double??

It is worth noting that the statement issued give no indication which 'products and services' will be offered. Like everyone else, I hope that the plans and parts are part of these products and services. However, although I appreciate the view that some may not wish to deal with or purchase form the new company for whatever reason, that approach will only lead to the further devaluation of the plans and part service. If the market for plans and parts declines, how long will the service be available. Whilst it may stick in the craw of some I would guess that this new service (if it comes to pass) will inevitably go the same way as Traplet if the modelling community doesn't support it.

Apologies for the double post. I attempted to edit to point out that I did not describe the subject as 'controversial' and inadvertently posted again.

For your information, Pete, it has a personal dimension for me too. I can't think that there are many for whom it wouldn't. However, two of the earliest posting expressed differing views of WW1 and that is, by it's very definition, divisive. I'm NOT arguing against the validity of this thread, in fact I fully support it's inclusion on the forum. However, you can't argue that for some, the war was justified and for others it was an abomination and, frankly, yes, it is political. All wars are, in some way political. However, the point I was trying to make was that it has often been quoted by moderators that subject matter should be restricted to modelling matters and was asking why this thread was acceptable (bearing in mind that it is a) not about modelling & b) on a potentially divisive subject) and a (very) previous thread on the state funeral for Margaret Thatcher was not?

I'm not going to make an argument for either opinion on this subject for once. I have my own feelings on the subject and will keep them to myself. However, I would respectfully ask the question as to why such a potentially divisive thread should continue to run when many other threads on similar veins have been closed with the reason being given that 'this is a modelling forum and should be restricted to the subject matter'? I, and am sure others, have been pulled up for expressing opinions on similar subjects in the past and whilst I'm more than happy to debate this and other non-modelling subjects, it usually leads to widely differing opinions. I'm just asking the question, what subjects are open for discussion and which are not? At the moment, I'm a little confused.