Jump to content

COG for circular 'plane


Tim Mackey
 Share

Recommended Posts

Own design based on a looky-like of the flyingwings bongo etc, I remember many years back having a mick reeves disco too.

This one is of course EPP and smaller ( around 16" diameter ), elevons and rudder, electric tractor powered.

The front 3 inches or so of the circle are cut out, and about the same amount at the rear to become the elevons.

Can anyone suggest a starting point for the COG please. TY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


Hi Tim

If it is a true circle, then this could also be linearly/logically represented as a plank/square/rectangle (I think). If so, then you need to be looking at 20% wing root as a starter. Not sure what sections or longitudinal stability method you will be using though..

Good luck

Martyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YOu say ABOUT 16" dia and ABOUT 3" cut off the front and back. If those numbers are right then the length of the cut edge at the front should be 13". Same at the back, and the distance between the 2 cut edges should be 10". I would go for 2.5" back from the front cut edge, which should be 2.5" in front of the centre of the circle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim

Just checked the RCGroups web site. The plan was published in March 2008 Design by 'Goldguy'CG is given as 25% root chord. ( sorry no idea how to attach link)

Mine was great fun to fly but as with all depron planes easily damaged.

Edited By Mowerman on 11/01/2013 16:47:06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks chaps, I'll check the dimensions properly now, and see if I can figure it out LOL

I woke this morning and thought, I fancy something new and different for tomorrows indoor meet, so found a sheet of 8mm EPP, spotted a picture of the bongo, and started cutting and building on the hoof as it were.

It uses an old home wound CK outrunner, 8x4 slowfly prop 2s 400mahr lipo, and gear found in the bits box.

Ive called it "Bonkers", and if it proves worthy, it may get a bit more decoration tomorrow night.

bonkers 1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flight report.

It flies..... sort of...... LOL. Set the COG at around 25% of chord at root, but it flew VERY high alpha, I would say around 10 or even 11 oclock! I moved the battery as far forward as it would go, but that made litle difference, so I ended up with a slight camber on the elevons, instead of the reflex I had set. I think I overdid the down thrust, and the COG is rearward - the motor is also now goosed, so when I replace it I will reduce the downthrust a lot, as well as adjust the balance

It was fun and definately worth the effort laugh

Now, another question for you guys.

Down thrust. A few of us were chatting, and opinions differ as to the reason - especially on a model like this ( flat plate non aerofoil blunt wing ). Some said that downthrust will actually pull the model up, and get the wing into a suitable AOA for flight - the theory being the prop will try to " level out" and hence pull the wing L/E up. Others said its the opposite.

So.... for a huge prize, which is correct ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tim.

All my flat wingers need down thrust ,even when the wing to tail incidences are zero zero ...BUT!....all have a long moment and generous tail area , Your model as in effect short coupled and will obviously be more sensitive to the centre of pressure position and any deflections at the rear .

There is a theory that suggests a flat blunt l/e damps pitch sensitivity and presents the wing at an aerodynamic positive angle of attack surpriseso wether or not any of this is relevant matters not as it's great to see you modelling and posting again.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tim

My understanding is that the thrustline should pass through the CoMoments (the single point where thrust, drag,weight and lift can be vectored) (and which will also move as velocity increases/decreases), so if the motor is below the wing, it will need downthrust, if it is above the wing (assuming it is a flat plate) then it will need upthrust (All thing being equal - which they aren't).. BEB will give you a better answer though,,,

Martyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a dozen or so EPP disc type planes, inc several own designs called NuttyOne, NuttyTwo, etc, Nutballs, RoundOne, PiPlane, etc, etc, all about the size of yours Tim.

Firstly, your downthrust looks WAY too much. Secondly, discs are very tolerent of CG, but most of mine close to your size fly OK at about 100-120mm back.

I regularly run one disc of about that size back at 140-150 mm and it prop hangs and sits in high alpha perfectly stable with no rock at all like nothing else, but that far back needs a small amount of down held in for speed flight. Does wind up the £100 milled out shockie brigade with its antics though............ Tee Hee........

Many of mine use the A2204 Suppo/SP motor with a GWS 8x4.3 slowfly cut down to 7.5x4.3.

Hope this helps...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Tim Mackey on 12/01/2013 18:28:59:

Some said that downthrust will actually pull the model up, and get the wing into a suitable AOA for flight - the theory being the prop will try to " level out" and hence pull the wing L/E up.

What it will do depends on where the prop is relative to the CG! Since we are talking front prop, no doubt they also believe the world is flat,and all the planets revolve round the earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Dave Bran on 12/01/2013 21:22:29:
Posted by Tim Mackey on 12/01/2013 18:28:59:

Some said that downthrust will actually pull the model up, and get the wing into a suitable AOA for flight - the theory being the prop will try to " level out" and hence pull the wing L/E up.

What it will do depends on where the prop is relative to the CG! Since we are talking front prop, no doubt they also believe the world is flat,and all the planets revolve round the earth.

What!!! - the earth isnt flat ??

LOL, thanks Dave, and your comments confirm my decision to reduce the downthrustyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Martyn K on 12/01/2013 19:43:27:

Hi Tim

My understanding is that the thrustline should pass through the CoMoments (the single point where thrust, drag,weight and lift can be vectored) (and which will also move as velocity increases/decreases), so if the motor is below the wing, it will need downthrust, if it is above the wing (assuming it is a flat plate) then it will need upthrust (All thing being equal - which they aren't).

. BEB will give you a better answer though,,,

Martyn

 

Ah but will I understand it ? LOL...cheers Martynyes

 

Edited By Tim Mackey on 12/01/2013 21:57:09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...