Bill Brown 3 Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Hi all, I have installed an RCV 90SP engine and also bought the starter rod for cranking the motor for starting, the thing is that there is no one way drive ratchet or similar so once the engine fires up the reverse torque unscrews the starting screw which is not desirable when you have to strip the cowl back off to re install it, am I missing something here??? looking forward to some feedback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwain Dibley. Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 From my experience with helis, there is usually a one way bearing either in the clutch (heli) or on the "wand" itself. So that under load from the starter the motor spins and when it fires and runs the wand spins freely. D.D. Edited By Dwain Dibley. on 22/02/2017 15:49:09 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Ogden Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 You could use a helicopter starter shaft with a one-way bearing. Should be loads on ebay these days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 The only rcv i have ever dealt with was a 120 sp and we just spun the prop as normal. reaching over the model to try and use the probe thing was precarious at best and we had a number of issues with the thing jumping out and damaging the cowl, not to mention almost causing us to fall on the bloomin model! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Brown 3 Posted February 22, 2017 Author Share Posted February 22, 2017 Thanks guys for your comments, I am inclined to go with your thoughts on this Jon, I will just have to get a geared starter as it takes a bit of turning being a geared motor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 I used to use one of these for a SP 60, standing behind the prop. I never had any problems with the system, per se, except a constant awareness that any mishaps damaged the model. Went back to conventional starting in the end. About says it all, alright engine, but a solution looking to find a problem to solve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solly Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 I have both the 90 and 120 SP engines, and have not experienced any of the problems as described by Jon. The wand will only give problems if it's worn at the end, and there is a ball ended version which makes things a bit easier. The starting screw must be attached really tightly or, as you have experienced, it will unscrew when the engine starts. It should be OK if the throttle setting is at the idle position and perhaps use some threadlock on the screw. It's only happened to me once in five years of use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 I use a cheap starter, 4s lipo, starts bigger motors than yours without hassle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J D 8 Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 I am also a SP60 user and as with Solly have had few problems and always start from behind. +1 on threadlock for all screws on a RCV. Glassed a steel washer inside the cowl access hole of my AT6 to prevent starter rod damage. Edited By J D 8 on 22/02/2017 16:46:15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.