Jump to content

What do I buy


Alan Gordon 5
 Share

Recommended Posts

Advert


I would Also vote Acrowot. It will be nice in the ARTF version as that is quite light plus it is cheap and very easy to buy too . With more focus on winter flying due to the high wing ( helps mud and puddle clearance on aileron servos)a Wot4 Mk 3 ARTF would also be a good choice. They are also very aerobatic and a great all rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a 10cc 4 stroke I would say try get something close to or under 5lbs. Ideally under from what I have read the acrowot is actually quite heavy I think you would maybe think it is under powered with a 60fs. I have not owned an Acrowot so I cannot speak from experience but I have flown planes at 5.5-5.75lbs with hot 50 class engines and they do not really have that good performance. I looked at the Acro but not for long and the Wot 4 has no details on weight either and from what I have read building a Wot 4 Classic 52" wingspan would be best anyway.

I personally bought a Great Planes Super Sportster @ 4.75lbs and balances with a 55 class 2 stroke you have a very broad engine choice because of the outstanding weight and design to balance with a 46FX. I have an Irvine 36 with a Genesis pipe that I could use if I want a light engine. A 40 will provide excellent performance at that weight and give great flight times but still able to use a 46 and 55 2 strokes and 52-62 four strokes all able to provide very good sport performance. It is also very aerodynamic so not a lot of drag on the airframe so your not wasting thrust just keeping it up to speed fighting the drag

I would look for something that is 5lbs aerodynamic and balances with the weight of your engine fairly well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Percy Verance on 09/11/2017 16:52:30:

No way does the H9 Pulse need an .80 four stroke. I flew mine for years with a saito .62. Plenty of power using an APC 13x6. But I fully appreciate there are those whom prefer a model to fly with huge gobs of power rather than it's wings............

One probem you'd have with a larger engine would be prop clearance. A 13 x6 just cleared for me.

The only reservation I'd have regarding the Pulse would be it's lack of great robustness. If your field or your landings aint good, steer clear of a Pulse.......

Edited By Percy Verance on 09/11/2017 16:56:44

Ahh but Percy, as I'm sure you would agree, its almost impossible to make a bad landing with a pulse

Tartan, kit built acrowots used to fly just fine on 48 4 strokes and even 35 2 strokes. I think these days we have just got used to more power. I wouldn't have any hesitation flying an AW with 60 4 stroke. slap a 12x6 on it, somewhere near 10k rpm, perfect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...