Jump to content

Flite Test Spitfire


Daren Cogdon
 Share

Recommended Posts

Advert


Hiya Darren.

Iv'e not built the Spitfire.I have how ever built the Sparrow and Edge FT plans.I did use the original FT foam which I purchased from a UK shop Webbs in Frodsham, Cheshire.The original FT foam is around 5mm and water proof with a peelable paper covering.It I have never used the hobby craft foam but I have read of builds using underlay sheeting from DIY shops.So the hobby craft foam should do the trick.

Give it a go, maybe build the wing and see how it folds and how strong it is.None of mine have survived many outings with my flying skills though.But great fun and cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one built with the Hobbycraft board (Westfoam). It is a fair bit heavier than the Flitetest board but still files well if you get the CG properly forward. This will need nose weight as there is quit a bit of area at the back. I also did a heavy acrylic paint job which did not help - it flew better before that. However it is still a lot of fun, even at my basic flying level.

The foam core itself is more rigid than the Flitetest foam, so you may be able to shed weight without losing too much stiffness if you remove the paper from the inside. It does not peel off well, you need water or steam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've built several of the FT designs now, all with Hobbycraft foamboard, and they have been fine. The Foam is denser, but it takes a knock very well, and given that the weight difference is evenly distributed I have not noticed any worse flying characteristics. The planes may need to be flown faster due to a slightly higher wing loading, but not noticably so because these planes are so light anyway. I have even hovered FT Flyers nose-in to a stiff breeze.

I have built the Mini Speedster kit in the brown FT foam, and it was a frustrating business: The paper comes off way too easily, the foam is less rigid and spraying the waxy coating is a pain.

The Hobbycraft stuff I weighed came out at 6g for 100 sq cm, 4g of which is paper (more-or-less: my kitchen scales only measure whole grams). Steam off the paper strategically and you will gain lightness at no expense of strength.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a Spitfire but this is Flite Test P38 kit. The canopy is off my old Seafury not quite right but better than a lump of foam it went together in a couple of days a bit crude but according to their website great flyers. I will try to make it look better as the weather is no good for flying at the moment.dsc_0767[1265].jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Daren, The front piece as supplied is very crude I am going to make one out of pink foam .The spinner is from a Spitfire and I only have 1 so need to get another. I think the concept is good for a fun plane the kits are pricey for what they are but by the time the handling charges and middle man money goes on it is to be expected .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have recently built the FT Vulcan, F22, Viggen, Versa and Long EZ. All EDF powered.

 

The building methods take a bit of getting used too, and the models are a bit "crude", but they all fly very well.

 

All built from free plans and excellent "how to" videos.

 

All in all, great FUN, and I can understand why FT have a cult following in the states!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is designed as an art board, so will take pretty much any type of colour. Be careful with the weight though. I used Child_flyer's acrylics on my FT simple spitfire and needed a lot more nose weight to balance it afterwards. Rattle cans work well and add much less weight. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I had a bit of a catastrophe with the Westfoam...! 

 

I had the main components of the Spitfire built, if not quite finished and assembled, and I decided to weigh the thing.

 

It came out at 320g with just two 9g servos fitted!  

 

Some serious changes needed, I think.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That does not sound bad. I need to check my book for the weight of mine before I took it apart (too many flights, too much confidence, too many 'arrivals'). I think it was 800-900g so plenty of room for your power train. The weight issue just starts going the wrong way when you get the tail too heavy - which I did with thick paint. That then means quite a bit of nose weight to counter it.

 

Edit: Just looked up the instructions weight, which is ~420g without battery (using the lighter Flitetest board). From your weight, you only need to add 2 more servos, receiver, ESC, motor. The motor will be ~50g, the rest adds up to not much more. So that is about right, as long as you can keep the required nose weight down. 

 

Even if not, it flies fine a little porky.

Edited by Dad_flyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Popped out to the shed. Empty weight of fuselage with wing, no servos motor or even swappable motor tray thing. It does include the nose weight I needed at first, I think 30g-ish: 490g 

 

My book says my all up weight was 850g without battery. 1007g flying!

 

Waaaay over the ultralight design, but still not actually heavy for a 41" span Spit. It did not have unlimited vertical though!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I might have got away with it after all?

 

Hmm.

 

No matter.

 

The second version of this will have the 5mm Westfoam used for the fuselage, but some 3mm for the wings.  I've seen another example built with this, and apparently it flies quite well.

 

However, I still have some 5mm left over, so might try again using that.

Edited by Daren Cogdon
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My overweight version flew first on a 2830-1000kv with a 9x5 floppy plastic prop (I think, it may have been 10x6). It was ok, but needed to be flat out a lot of the time.

Flew much better on 2830-1300kv with 9x5 prop (~230W). That was nice.

3s2200 battery, as in the plans.

Edited by Dad_flyer
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...