Jump to content

Nominal discharge rate for Ni-Mh testing.


John Wagg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Advert


I assume, (make an ASS of U and ME).

1. That its Wot 4, Pupiteer, even up to a 5 kilo slow thing with standard analogue servos of the 3001 type. 
Then I would be looking at it supporting 300 to 500 mHr for an hour.

Rational, that’s what that sort of servo uses. An hour covers 5 flights. Therefore the setup will fail at some other point.

 

Digital, hi torque, bets off. 
Why are you wanting to test it. Because it’s good practice to test periodically, or not a trusted battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Don.

Flying a vintage (3 channel, analogue midi size servos - R,E,Th ) last weekend at Cocklebarrow. I had 4 flights and my Tx reported a low Rx battery of 4.7v so decided to curtail flying for the day. The reading of the battery showed 4.8v but on moving a stick it dropped to 4.7v so decided not to risk a lost model.

I would have expected the battery to have lasted longer so just want to do a check on it's capacity.

i have just put the battery on discharge at 600mA assuming the tester is reasonably accurate.

I'll report back.

John.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, as Paul said, expect 10 pages. If the pack is good, I would expect, from a Junior 60, to a Falcon, that the discharge is no more than 50/70 mAh per flight. I Assume, note the word, deckchair, tranni, beer in other hand.

4 flights, it’s not charged, it’s knackered, your charger is knackered.

One observation, back in the day, aircraft landed, in one piece, same field to takeoff, that was a total success. Now we have telemetry. And I’m not sure, if a momentary drop to 4.7V is bad. I know, I’ve scared myself, operating a hooligan machine with seven digital HV jobbies going end to end, LiPo batteries, when the nice posh lady starts wailing about her lack of volts. Others might say is a momentary drop is bad. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andy Gates said:

John,

 

Why not get a receiver pack load tester?

This will do the job of telling you if the pack is OK under simulated load.

Something like this

Hi Andy.  I have one of those but the drawback is it won't tell me how long is left in the battery. 

Because of the general flat discharge curve there is a chance of being near the bottom end of it's capacity.

On a good day I can be up for 20 minutes easily on any flight.

Cheers

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frank Skilbeck said:

John, how are you charging the battery, with a standard wall charger or a smart charger. If it's the latter and you set the charge rate too low it can give a false peak which the charger interprets as fully charged.

Hi Frank, I have both a smart charger and an old charger that gives a constant 50mA output. Normally I would use the smart charger.

That is another quandary at what level should the charger be set ?  Charger is currently set at 1.7 Amp.

cheers.

John

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the input. Old days with Ni-cads was just charge at 50mA for 14 hrs and fly all day up on the slope.

Not sure about Ni-Mh cells. Especially when they are said to be 2600mA capacity compared with the old 500mA Ni-cad'.

Still doing some testing but just needed a bit of guidance on real world experience etc.

Regards

John

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, capacity, and ability to deliver power are not related. If I wanted a battery to power a radio, a small cell (AA) NiMh would suit very well. 
An aircraft, panic moments, sticks to corner, not too sure.
Fit a C cell pack, same panic, no nice Lady going on about volt shortages.

But even so, your machine will be happy with any pack that is in reasonable condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andy Gates said:

John,

 

Charging AA sized NiMH cells at 1.7A is way too high and will cause the charger to cut off early.

I would cut that by at least 1/3, normally for me I use a dedicated slow charger to charge my buddy box transmitter and receiver pack.

Thanks Andy. I will reduce as per your suggestion and see what happens.

I have other packs and will see if I can do a comparison.

Cheers

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...