Jump to content

rc plane crash - 68% pitts challenger robbie skipton at raf cosford


peter coxon
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted by Martin Harris on 20/07/2016 20:59:04:

The point I was trying to make was that an engine failure should not hazard anyone on the ground if normal airshow guidelines are being followed - therefore a possible engine fault is not an unacceptable risk as, for example, would be a poor radio installation or poorly constructed/maintained airframe.

Indeed and one of the delights of a model show over a full size one is that there's no pilot in the aircraft so the aircraft can be risked in ways that would not be possible otherwise, eg low speed, low level aerobatics where an engine problem can give the results above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


When I was learning to fly full sized gliders, we had to practice dealing with all types of emergencies so you deal with it quickly without thinking about it. Now I fly model planes and accept that I will crash my pride and joy to prevent it hitting anybody if there is a risk, even if you are doing all things correct and the other person is in the wrong place/area walking towards the flying area ignoring the warning shouts to move away.

I accept that according to Sod's law can and will happen and failures do happen to all of us.

I feel sad that there are accidents resulting in 2.4 deaths on our roads every minute around the world but we accept it and carry on (1.25m per year).  but full sized air shows and model planes, as it's a rarity we suffer.

 

 

Edited By Keith Simmons on 21/07/2016 10:17:14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish Mr Skipton every success with His replacement Airframe .

Delighted that he has kept His spirits up , and I am quite staggered by the somewhat vicious criticism .

I do not subscribe to trial by media , which simply plays into the hands of the gutter - press and opinions are often best kept to ourselves. Modellers are under enough pressure without shooting ourselves in the foot .

Easy to hide behind a keyboard , and we all stray off the mark at times , it's a fine line twixt argument , opinion and discussion .

Mia Culpa . hope my Jankers ends soon.

Keep em Flyin .thumbs up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here here...Peter, well put... although I tried to say the same but was "told off".... Modellers are under enough pressure without shooting ourselves in the foot ...

absolutely.. I like shows but if anyone wishing to put one on or underwrite one, reading some of the opinions on here, in relation to what was a non event, explained perfectly by an organiser and by the pilot himself, no one remotely in any danger, and safely handled..... would spell the end.. some of it is akin to ambulance chasing IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand that people have different views on what is acceptable and what it not.however.everyone is very focused on my engine, but several people have experianced the same problem with a variation of engines. So why is everyone still going on about it.

IF YOU cant accept that issues can happen at public events and i or other modellers make you fear for your safety. Then dont come to the events.Simple.Statiatically however, you are more likely to be in a car crash leaving the show than been hit my a model!.

Im not going to be drawn in to this argument anymore. The fault has been found. The plane was flew away from the public before it crashed so i was on the other side of the runway ( some 50m - 100m away from the crowd!).. if any one does upload the full video you will see!.

And if i felt anyone was in danger,the plane would have been put in the ground by me without thinking.

As i stated before. Instead of writing on here and complaining or trying to pick apart my maintenance. Give me a call! My number is in a previous post. I will be more than happy to go through all that has to go in to getting a plane like this ready!

Anyway. Thank you again for all the supportive comments. The new one is well underway now and i will start a new thread with the build and design soon ( maybe i can be picked apart about the build as well)

Lots of love

ROBBIE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to financing... yes it is expensive. But you have to remember. Im a scratch builder. So while you are spending ?1200 on a new 100 - 150cc model artf. For the same money i can build a 65% model uncovered. The servos etc still cost the same. Just i need more to do the same. I still have to buy one or two one week and more the next! Im not a millionaire ( yet lol)

The 68% got built in 1 year. It still took me over 8 months to buy all the bits to go in it!

So i dont understand why people think you have to be stupidly rich to afford a model like this size of model! Just takes longer to get the plane in thr air than a 100 - 150cc

( space is the problem to store it tho, hence mine are stored at work ha ha)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Robbie Skipton on 21/07/2016 20:12:41:
With regards to financing... yes it is expensive.

So i dont understand why people think you have to be stupidly rich to afford a model like this size of model! Just takes longer to get the plane in thr air than a 100 - 150cc

maybe it was the price you are asking for the parts set on your website wink

Will you need a new engine or is the original salvageable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmao! Its not that bad considering what you are getting... and i dont ask for all the money upfront.

We are awaiting 2 new plug caps and a new plug to try the engine. It turns over smoothly. Lucky the wing took the impact. So will let you know.

Electronics are still not tested ( will be tomorrow if customers allow me to). We are sending the powerbox back anyway to get it all checked aa yoy cant be too sure if anything has gone... belt and braces etc

Edited By Robbie Skipton on 21/07/2016 21:00:33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm late to this one, so excuse me if what I say has already been said.

I'm not sure full size procedures are relevant to this discussion. This isn't a machine capable of carrying human (or any other) life.

The model was a superb looking bit of kit. We have no reason to suspect maintenance was not in accordance with LMA procedure.

The model was being flown away from spectators, in a display area where any kit problems would minimise any risk to spectators. It sadly suffered engine failure at the worst possible moment. Downwind at low speed and low height with a crowd nearby your options are as minimal as it gets. I don't see anything in the video that calls piloting skills into question.

To my mind the only real lesson coming out of this is that multi cylinder two strokes have a big weakness, if they lose all power when one cylinder lets go for whatever reason.

All the best to Mr Skipton getting the replacement bipe in the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by SuperNash on 22/07/2016 09:15:48:

I'm not sure full size procedures are relevant to this discussion. This isn't a machine capable of carrying human (or any other) life.

The model was a superb looking bit of kit. We have no reason to suspect maintenance was not in accordance with LMA procedure.

 

Agree with all of that. Safety is very, very important, but it has to be credible and proportional. The funny thing is, the critics who are pointing out the dangers due to it being practically full size are generally the same people who, last week, were busy telling me that, in fact, small models could be much more dangerous than big ones!

Edited By The Wright Stuff on 22/07/2016 09:35:20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no question in my mind that the model was being operated safely, the pilot took the appropriate action and people were never at any risk. My post a page or so back was simply expressing the view that if a) this is a known issue with ZDZ engines, b) no amount of maintenance or checking can prevent such an issue occurring, and c) ZDZ do not respond to queries and are not obviously working on a fix, I personally would not want to invest in a multi-thousand pound airframe to be powered by the same engine that failed. The idea of losing a model like this to an unavoidable but known mechanical failure is bad enough; losing a second would be even more painful.

Edited By MattyB on 22/07/2016 14:30:40

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...