Jump to content

Barnstorming again !


Recommended Posts

So this was started a few years ago for one of the mass builds but was put aside as a result of 'barnstormer fatigue' after building the 63 & 72 inch versions,this being the original 52" single channel one (when DB was button man)

IMGA0981.thumb.JPG.817c6b18069004a14e6dac6e841bc796.JPG

 

IMGA0922.thumb.JPG.776b62ee7735d2e662d7c85d7740819e.JPG

 

20221222_212021.thumb.jpg.d83bc0e72a742be5359760821ba4205f.jpg

 

20221228_171757.thumb.jpg.8c70c5e8c49334419a75148c843c068c.jpg

 

20221222_212150.thumb.jpg.66dd21b7e3a7bf88e5d470329c0c5320.jpg

 

20221228_180617.thumb.jpg.cbdeb4e9fc1515256d58b3887d356190.jpg

 

  

 

20221225_095507.jpg

Edited by jeff2wings
More pictures
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they come in various sizes from 32" to 90" and would be a easy conversion to EP ,when I made fuselage for the 63" one it was without the extra 'padding ' that DB added on the following versions. I have made a few changes to the way the wing is made and of course to the tailplane but that's all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is worth saying that Boddington updated the Barnstormer 63  and called it Mark One - the plan is on Outerzone together with the 52 inch, the 39 inch Baby, the 29 inch Micro and 89 inch Mighty Barnstormer.

 

Boddo didn't do a 58 inch Barnstormer but if you scale up a 52 inch plan to 110 percent then a set of Tyro Major wing ribs just suit.  DB Sport & Scale sell the wing rib sets for Tyro Major and also the 63, 72 and 88 inch Barnstormer plan & ribs etc.

Edited by kc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well apart from joining the wing panels and a good sanding down the construction is done just need to dig out a few suitable engines and then decide on what type of covering to use?

20221229_180318.thumb.jpg.d5e9f8d9ead472fa8f7857fc35c40c93.jpg

 

changes to wing panel construction was to leave out the rear spar,add extra vertical webbing 

 

20221229_180824.thumb.jpg.9986374dd102a117202a55532eb545f7.jpg 

 

Tailplane now a standard flat plate like the later versions but without spars top and bottom ,l never really liked that 

 

20221229_180730.thumb.jpg.95631a53b68febaa0bc3d132ffb57954.jpg

 

No problem going EP with this if you want, I will be using the engine mounting plate as designed so it will be easy to swap different engines to try out 

 

20221229_180655.thumb.jpg.2df1db6c4b384bc4a5a6f45a67a2e060.jpg

 

carving that top decking was fun if a bit messy lol !

 

20221229_180647.thumb.jpg.efd51b7374506550f608702f0ce8a05a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Barnstormer is a lovely classic design but why do aeromodellers insist on shaping a solid slab of balsa for the moving control surfaces (typically rudder/elevator/ailerons) when even in the 1930's and 40's high performance metal skinned aircraft utilised fabric covered control surfaces?

 

Not an aeronautical engineer but pretty sure that the exerts did their sums back then.

 

To my thinking, this is just adding weight where it is not needed 🙃

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the advantages of building from plans, as I'm sure you're aware kc,you can make changes to suit your own preferences what ever they may be,in this instance I left out the rear spar as it seems unnecessary and the  'aerofoil '  of the tailplane (that's more of a diamond profile) again because I see no advantage over a flat plate for this type and size of model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As originally designed the Barnstormer 52 did not have an elevator, so changing the construction when adding an elevator seems worthwhile.

Its interesting that the 52 tailplane is quite wide - spans 21 inches I think - while the 63 is 24 inches which is not quite scaled up in proportion.   Wide tailplanes make the model unwieldy in transportation and storage!

 

I recently acquired a nicely built  electric Barnstormer 63  ( ex everybody at my club! ) and I wonder whether you have any comments on where the CG should be for that size ( with lifting section to tailplane )  As I don't have the plan for that size I don't know what Boddo specified, so I will try 25 percent to start with and maybe work back a little after a test flight.   So any comments on what you found worked well would be welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...