Jump to content

Pick a plane 2008!


Recommended Posts

Most of the aircraft mentioned up to now I already have plans for or can obtain them no problem, it would be nice to see something that no other mag has done, maybe an experimental German job or one of ours, how about the Folland 117? Supermarine 391? ( I hear mumbling of 'wot the ell are them?), now a 5 foot span Hawker P.1030 would be nice!

                            regards,                Terry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terence

Your thoughts are very similar to my own. Although I have seriously considered the Do 335. As I  consider it to be an almost ideal twin. No (major) problems from a one motor failure, good wing area, low cross sectional area. CG should not be a real issue. Although the circular body puts me off (difficulty of a light simple build).

Some of the twins suggested, suffer from difficulties in getting the CG far enough foreword, without lead. The reason being the short nose, motor distance from the CG, whilst the tail moment can be quite long.

Erfolg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 A couple of racers:

 1) Napier-Heston J5
http://project-napier-heston.com/
http://www.airracinghistory.freeola.com/aircraft/Napier-Heston%20Racer.htm
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=623370

 2) Sorceress biplane:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck-Mahoney_Sorceress
http://collections.nasm.si.edu/code/emuseum.asp?profile=objects&newstyle=single&quicksearch=A19840416000
http://rclineforum.de/forum/thread.php?threadid=13792
http://www.aviation-history.com/garber/images/beck_sorc-2.jpg

3)  A sorta Classic Control Line Team Racer lookalike for RC: a Dalesman, for example.

http://dkd.net/clmodels/tracing.html 

edit:
Electric is my preferred power but the possibility to use glow would be a plus. Size: outdoor size but not huge. 
I am not a big scale enthusist, so "near scale" would be adequate. The experts can tinker with the details...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David,

After the recent article in RCME I would love to see a turbine model for us all of the Gloster E28/39 (also referred to as the "Gloster Whittle").  As for the other two I have a love for these:

 My three are:

1/ Gloster E28/29

2/ Feistler Storch

3/ DH53 Humming Bird

Regards, Phil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the twins suggested, suffer from difficulties in getting the CG far enough foreword, without lead. The reason being the short nose, motor distance from the CG, whilst the tail moment can be quite long.

Erfolg 

Hi Erf,

          agreed, especially the Fw 187 and the MIG 15 (original not the blowlamp) and I suspect I may have a simular problem with the Me 410, packing lead in the nose is a last resort as it serves no purpose apart from deadweight, at least a battery supplies power and used as weight is contributing to the CG setup.

The Do445 looked a lot like the 335 but with only the forward prop, I actually like it more than the 335 which looks like it has been on steroids in comparison, there are so many very interesting aircraft out there that have never been written about in a mag let alone a plan produced and it is a shame to waste an opportunity like this thanks to RCM&E,

                               best regards,                Terry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all, I like this thread and think that we should all be made to vote again and do what PERTTI METSANHEIMO has done and leave links to pictures.

I agree with Terence (well the posts with his choices) that says we shouldnt choose something that has been done to death and would be suitable even for less experienced builders. Not the post just after  were 3 obscure planes are mentioned that you struggle to find pictures of even on google.

So if I had to re write my votes they would look like this.

1 Messerschmitt bf 110     http://images.google.co.uk/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=en&q=bf+110&btnG=Search+Images

2 Mosquito   http://images.google.co.uk/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=en&q=dh+mosquito&btnG=Search+Images

3 Mitsubishi Zero  http://images.google.co.uk/images?svnum=10&um=1&hl=en&q=mitsubishi+zero&btnG=Search+Images

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I know, it's 6 choices but what are the chances of splitting this thing in 2 for new builders & experienced builders/flyers. Two plans over the year two radically different skill levels.

Yes I count myself in the lower skill level area.

 My choices would be.

Beginner level!

1 Fieseler Storch (am currently building the 54 inch plan in RCM&E a couple of years back) one of my all time favourite planes.

2 Miles Magister

3 Grumman Avenger

All single engine, could all be ic or electric.

 Experienced level

1 Grumman Gulfstream (EDF or PSS)- In my view the most beautiful modern aircaft in the sky today.

2 PBY Catalina - Ugly as hell on the ground, gracefull as anything in the air (would have to include retracts)

3 V22 Osprey - A personnal challenge to mr N go for it

 Keith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Well, much as I like Warbirds I think it's time for a few light aircraft:-

1. Piper Archer

2. Auster (Lycoming engined)

3.  Decathlon

But if you really must do a Warbird, lets have something even more distinctive than a Tiffy, such as ............

1. Westland Lysander

2. Airspeed Oxford

3. Gloster Whittle E28/29  (EDF and retracts) 

Must be possible to electrify.............. 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrance

Any fool should recognise that a Challenger tank will not fly well. The section is all wrong, lacking a smooth camber and rather sharp leading edge.

However however the Antonov KT or "Kryla Tanka", would be an ideal model, particularly if the tank were to have driven tracks, these would be started just before touchdown. Details of the aircraft? can be found in "The History of Soviet Aircraft from 1918" Author Vaclav Nemecek, Pub. Collins.

Fellow modellers join with me to vote overwhelmingly for this great aerial voyager of the Soviets. Or maybe it is time for our own great "Government of all the Talents" to build the "Winged Challenger", it would of course soar  in the sky with all the aplomb of all the other tremendous acheivments.

Erfolg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A warbird will always go down well, but lets have something that you can't get easily as a kit or ARTF:

1) Stuka

No retracts to worry about, some good colour schemes, interesting variants (87G with those big cannons) & the possibility of some very cool diving manouvers.

2) Blackburn Skua

http://freespace.virgin.net/john.dell/blackburn_skua.htm

3)Boulton-Paul Defiant

http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/uk/boulton_paul/defiant/Defiant.htm

The mrs wants a bleriot, but if she wants it on the list she can damn well do her own post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...