Jump to content

Precedent Stampe 1/4 Scale


cymaz

Recommended Posts

Advert


Very nice result Stearmanandy. I see you've put the squares and then you've tightened all together, base and squares, don't you?

I use a different method for film-over-film works, which ensure a finish without a single bubble. First, I apply and tighten the base layer, and then I put the upper layer (decoration) using monokote solvent (or in most cases, glass cleaner which works exactly the same and it's cheaper...). I remove the excess of product with a credit card or similar (as in "wet" vinyl applications) and let dry overnight. The next day, I ensure the corners and external lines with the iron at a very low temperature (90-100 centigrade), and that's it.

The only downside of this system is that you can't re-tighten afterward, but I've used it in many models with no issue at all (the last one was a Pepsi Chipmunk from Apache Aviation, with a checkered finish).

In any case, very nice work

Edited By Alejandro Valle Carrillo on 12/05/2014 13:03:49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys, well done on your flight cymaz. I keep coming back and looking at this great thread to get ideas for my Stampe, as you've seen she requires a bit of TLC. I've now made a bit of a slow start on her was very surprised at her weight compared to others here must be the motor she had in her and that she's covered in what is possibly Solorfilm from way back. I've now decided to strip it all from the fusealarge and recover what in I'm not sure of atm, inter plane struts need replacing as have rusted and got rather weak. Cabane structure needs resoldering and struts making, I've made a start on the cockpits and made some new windshields. This wasn't quite what i had in mind when i bought her, hoping that all i had to do was a bit of tidying up and get her in the air ho humfrown. Heres some pics1.jpg2.jpg3.jpg4.jpg5.jpg

I think that adding the instruments to the front and painted the insides gray have made a difference.Will be back looking for more ideas from what you guys have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to the field yesterday to do my maiden but the engine played up and I never left the pits area, so I am going to convert the SAITO 180 back to glow, this will keep it cooler and stop it overheating.

Does anyone have any experience with header tanks? With my current tank set up it is on the CoG and low in the aircraft frame. When I convert back to glow this position is not ideal. So I am thinking that with a header tank I can put this up near to the carb, will this work? And will the fuel rise up from the lower main tank to the header tank?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi John, first question is why is the tank so far back? This cannot help the cg unless you have already got this correct without fuel and will give fuel flow problems with the nose up. Fine if you are using crankcase pressure and a regulator. The supplied tank on mine fits just behind the motor.

As I see it, a header tank is to prevent air bubbles from being sucked into the carb. I have never needed to use one but have built models for others with this feature. The fuel still needs to be sucked up somehow from the rear tank so would serve no other purpose despite what you may read in some model mag. articles about none return valves in the line etc.

If you persevere with petrol you will only need a small tank anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These work. No adjustment possible or necessary. Only produced in the 70`s but I managed to get a couple more at last year`s Nats bring and buy. Never tried nor had to use one on a four stroke though. Crankcase pressure is fed to the tank, which is then sealed and as the throttle is closed a crafty fool proof valve shuts down giving a constant pressure of fuel to the carb. regardless of attitude or tank location. Only works with twin needle carbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks very much cymaz, that is perfect information, I've ordered the pump....... Lets see what happens.

I striped the engine down today ready to put it back as a glow, I am going to replace the bearings as well.......any way whilst striping down I noticed that the cam's were severely warn, I think this was due to the overheating and there not being enough lubrication getting to them. A new cam gear has been ordered as well........this is getting to be expensive. I'll post some pics tomorrow.

looking good Martin, in no time you will be covering.laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That engine must of got remarkably hot to have generated enough heat to do that damage. It's a wonder the small end and main bearings didn't seize first. If that engine got that hot within the cowl, a glow engine will do just the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am always puzzled why we don't do what the heli flyers do - and have additional heat sinking on the cylinder head. Apart from putting some additional weight in the right area, it cant be that difficult (for a 2 stroke anyway!) to get a heat-sink from RS or Farnell, cut a suitable sized hole and clamp it around the cylinder head. You could be very flexible how the heat-sink was cut so that it fits properly, but you would need to make sure that it was clamped around a reasonable thickness of head - say 10mm - so you don't get uneven cooling. It will be something that I will be looking at when I am at this stage..

Martyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martyn, putting a heat sink on the cylinder head will only increase the surface area, you will still need to have the correct airflow to take that heat away. I fly helis, I don't use heat sinks as there is enough open space and air around the engine to keep it cool, most fuel powered helis also have built in fans to direct airflow over and around the engine. You have to look at the physics of airflow to maximise it's potential as a cooling system. Volkswagen beetles used an air cooled engine, to make this system efficient the airflow was ducted around the heads very cleverly. using louvers to create a Venturi effect can be very helpful, as some of the chaps have got installed, if it comes in, it must be able to get out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi cymaz, after a day of trying to get the SAITO to run on glow fuel with the pump, I've given up trying to get it to run properly.

So I am seriously considering putting in a Evolution 26GX. I know you have the 33GX do you think the 26 will have enough power? The reason for choosing the 26GX is that I think it is smaller than the 33 and so I will be hopefully abel to get the exhaust in the cowl without cutting it. Does any know how much smaller the 26 is?

Can I also ask how much of the cowl did you end up cutting to fit the exhaust in, or is there another option for the exhaust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...