Jump to content

Another Reichard Champion

Pete B

Recommended Posts

Since my old Ripmax Nebula disappeared into a cloud last July, never to reappear, I've hankered for a bit of performance in marginal conditions. Now the Nebula, being what it was, was never going to be anywhere in the performance league but it was enough for what I wanted.

'Hook a boomer' and thermal soaring can be all too easy, so scraping 20 mins in marginal conditions can be just as, or even more, satisfying. My Phoenix P2000 is OK-ish when the lift is good but flights often tend to be straight up and down - a foamie will never really 'cut the mustard' for thermal soaring, IMHO.

I've been browsing the Net for a while and, reassured by Andy's thread over here, by reading a few German and Dutch forums and prompted by an early season sale, I bit the bullet on a Reichard Champion from Staufenbiel.

The spec was right with a GRP fuselage, built-up 2.74m span wings, about 10oz/sqft wing loading and the reported ability to penetrate a moderate breeze.

The package was duly delivered promptly and the contents, whilst not perfect in every respect, certainly didn't disappoint. The wings are a thing of beauty, with an attractive tapering planform and a tad of dihedral introduced by the elliptical tips;

stauf champion and dh60 002 (1024x630).jpg

Nicely finished wings, with the translucent Oracover well-finished and not a wrinkle or bubble in sight. The ailerons are already top-hinged with Oracover, as is the elevator. The fuselage has a rather noticeable seam but it doesn't detract too much from the appearance and is reinforced with a 1cm wide CF tape running the full length on each side of the fuselage.

A fairly comprehensive hardware kit is included:

stauf champion and dh60 007 (1024x739).jpg

Propulsion-wise, I couldn't bring myself to invest in an MVVS but a while back I had pushed the button on the HK Turnigy Gliderdrive 840Kv canned brushless, which I'm proposing to pair with a 14x8 folding prop and a Hobbywing Pentium 60A ESC, running on 3S.

The motor bears a remarkable likeness to the MVVS offering, admittedly - now whether it delivers the goods remains to be seen.....smile

stauf champion and dh60 012 (1024x751).jpg

The Champion is a later development of the Ellipsoid, which dates, I believe from the early 2000's and which is a mid/shoulder wing design. The Champion was essentially the same but has the wings mounted on top of the fuselage, which neatly avoids the head-scratching and contortions in getting a pair of wings to neatly and securely butt up to the fuselage. In short, it's simpler to get it right!

In either case, being from the NiMh era, the battery arrangements are designed around an 8 or 10 cell pack, with an angled bay extending from the rear of the cockpit to about mid-chord of the wings, the intention being that in the event of a heavy landing, the pack would be ejected through the cockpit to minimise the damage - yes, of course....smile

Anyway, in the LiPo era, things have changed, so to use one of the LiPo advantages - weight reduction - it is necessary to have a re-think about component location and adapt the cockpit fit to suit. Moving the pack forward will eliminate, or at least reduce, extra noseweight to set the correct C of G.

More on how I'm going about this in the next post.....


Link to comment
Share on other sites


OK, let's start from the pointy end and the motor mount has to be the first item on the list. I was a bit surprised to find just a disc of GRP board supplied - surely that alone wouldn't cope with the rigours encountered around the motor and prop? Apart from that, it would probably require some additional reinforcement from within the fuselage to ensure it remains attached to the hull. At just 1.5mm thick, it doesn't present much gluing area on the edge.

My solution was to add a disc of 3mm birch ply to the disc, which significantly added to its strength and vastly increased the glued area of the mount. The GRP mount was pre-drilled in all the right places for my motor, which was a bonus but it was quite a bit oversize for the hole at the front of the fuselage.

stauf champion and dh60 011 (1024x768).jpg

One solution would have been simply to fit the mount in the fuselage as supplied and cut off the excess material but this would shorten the nose, increasing the weight needed to set the C of G. Prior to bonding the ply to the GRP, I mounted the GRP disc on some 12mm studding, fitted it in the pillar drill and sanded it down to a diameter which almost reached the edge of the nose aperture. I had to bear in mind that there would be side- and down-thrust set, so 2-3mm shy of the opening was about right. Once bonded, the sandwich was then turned so that the ply was slightly chamfered to follow the contour of the fuselage. The cooling holes were also drilled and Dremelled through the ply as well.

stauf champion and dh60 015 (1024x767).jpg

Satisfied with this, it was time to fit the mount to the fuselage. 2 deg right thrust seemed about right but reports on various forums suggested 2 deg downthrust was insufficent to minimise the tendency for the model to nose-up on full throttle. I decided to make it nearer 3 or 4 deg - yes, it's easy enough to program in some down elevator if necessary - but if it can be done mechanically in the first place....

30 min epoxy with micro-balloons provided the necessary stiction - and the studding was ideal for eyeballing the offset required - it's not quite as extreme as the photo may suggest!. Once dry, the studding was removed and the excess material sanded away, leaving a nice flush face for the spinner. I'm happy that I've now got a very sturdy mount, well-capable of handling the forces of a rotating 14" prop. The ears either side have been Dremelled out too, to provide some ventilation to the motor.

stauf champion and dh60 021 (1024x768).jpg

I had decided to discard the supplied ply NiMh mounting tray shown just above the nose in the first pic of the thread and instead fit a ply floor in the cockpit, screwed to four beech blocks epoxied to the fuselage sides, to hold the LiPo pack:

stauf champion 005 (1024x768).jpg

stauf champion 004 (1024x768).jpg

The ply tray was set high enough in the fuselage to allow the ESC to be fitted beneath, leaving about 15mm or so of free space below the ESC for cooling air to pass. The red wire on the heatsink is a Spektrum temperature sensor for telemetry feedback. I haven't cut lightening holes in the ply tray as I felt it would possibly weaken the tray and the small amount of weight saved would be of no value:

stauf champion 002 (1024x735).jpg

Moving back a little further, the rudder and elevator servo mount ply had been supplied and was used. I'd have been happy to use a mini-sized rather than standard servo but I had a couple of Towerpro SG-5010's to hand, so they'll be going in. Immediately in front of the servos, I fitted a ply tray, at half fuselage height for easy access, which will hold the Rx, telemetry module, altimeter and variometer:

stauf champion 008 (1024x756).jpg

That'll do for now - the gentle waft of chicken Bunha from the slow-cooker tells me dinner is ready.....teeth 2


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inner man refreshed with the chicken Bhuna, I'll move on....smile

Time to fit the rudder and elevator linkages. Nylon snakes are supplied in the kit and despite them being quite slippy, by the time the inevitable bend was induced at the tail, the friction had increased to the point where it was noticeable, so I adopted my usual practice of binning the inners in favour of 22SWG piano wire. Not frictionless but rather better than most snake inners, I've found, and sufficiently rigid at the outer ends to avoid any lost motion through bending. The ends are well cleaned and soldered to M2 threaded connectors, allowing clevises to be fitted.

I also had to consider the rudder and elevator horns. The elevator system, employing a bent wire in a piece of tubing attached with covering film to the elevator, didn't seem that clever to me, so in common with many other builders, I substituted it with a conventional horn. Not having a suitable ball-link, I aligned the horn and used a standard steel clevis, once again discarding the supplied plastic clevis. The supplied rudder horn, from GRP sheet, was also discarded in favour of a commercial horn.

First of all the outers were fitted, with lots of filing to give as straight an exit through the fuselage as possible. The snakes were roughened where they contacted the fuselage and epoxied in place, some masking tape being used to keep the surrounding surface clean:

stauf champion and dh60 035 (1024x768).jpg

stauf champion and dh60 036.jpg

The finished result:

stauf champion and dh60 039 (768x1024).jpg

Next stage was fitting the rudder post. As with Andy's build, the tailplane platform induced a significant tilt - mine was such that the tailplane was noticeably leaning to the left compared to the wing. Efforts to induce a correction by clamping just didn't work for me and the fin was correct otherwise so I went ahead and epoxied the rudder post in place, using plenty of clamps:

champ 030614 001 (804x1024).jpg

champ 030614 002 (810x1024).jpg

Once dry, I added a strip of 1/32" ply to the left side of the tailplane platform, which has resulted in everything ending up straight and truethumbs up:

champ 030614 003 (810x1024).jpg

More soon....


Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day I'm going to have a radio installation to be proud of....sad I always seem to end up with odd wires looking untidy - and this installation is no exceptionembarrassed

I'm using an AR9300 Rx, rather overkill for this model, which is just using throttle, ailerons, spoilerons, rudder and elevator but it's what I have available and suitable at present. That is coupled to a TM1000 telemetry module, providing the downlink to the DX9. A Spekky altimeter will provide height information and a Winged Shadow Thermal Scout provides the variometer function. I hope to replace these two modules with a Spekky variometer once it arrives from the States. As mentioned earlier, ESC temperature will be monitored, as will Rx volts and fade/hold events.

The rudder and elevator servos have been installed and one EZ connector fitted. I know they don't find favour with everyone but provided they are fitted with care and threadlock used where appropriate, I've found them completely reliable - and they make installation and adjustment very straightforward. The satellite Rx is mounted on the far wall with the aerial extending into the rear of the fuselage. Below that is the altimeter with the AR9300 to the right. These are all mounted using Velcro pads. The two cables disappearing over the far side are 10cm extension leads from the Rx, to make connection to the aileron leads a simpler process when assembling the model:

champ 030614 005 (1024x768).jpg

Looking from the other side, the TM1000 module is mounted on the floor, with the Thermal Scout module on the side wall above. The Ar9300 Rx is designed for carbon fuselages, with the option to mount the aerials externally on fairings. Given the limited amount of carbon in this fuselage, I've resisted the temptation to start drilling holes just yet and I've settled for one aerial facing fore and aft in the cockpit and the second laterally on the floor under the C of G position. If range tests show any issues, I'll mount them externally.

champ 030614 004 (1024x768).jpg

The next job is to install the aileron servos and leads....


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks gents!smile

On with the aileron servos. Staufenbiel recommend their D 260 2.8Kgcm 20g MG servos (similar in size and spec to the HS-82MG) but, considering the ailerons are not particularly large on the Champion and encouraged by positive reports, I've used HK939MG servos - a tad less powerful at 2.5Kgcm but metal-geared and only 12.5g.

The aileron servo mounting system, in common with many sailplane installations, is relatively simple - just glue the servo into the recess in the wing. Well, of course, it isn't quite that simple - it never is!smile

Slender as the wing is, there's not a lot of room for spare cable within the wing and the small size of the cable aperture in the ribs precluded using an extension lead connector, threaded through the wing, so the servo and extension leads were cut and soldered to a suitable continuous length.

Reichard helpfully supply some nylon monofilament pre-threaded through the wing D section and tape it to the root rib and servo bay, with a loop at the bay end. The plastic moulding of the JST plug was removed from the end of the extension and the monofil loop, with a bit of masking tape, was connected to the JST pins and pulled through. Even with the narrower section, it required a bit of patient shuffling before the pins appeared at the root.

The second wing would have been done the same way - but the monofil came away from the tape and disappeared inside the wing....crying 2 Now, my normal method is to tie an M3 nut to a bit of thread and drop it through the wing from root to bay - easy! That wasn't going to work this time, so, after a couple of minutes head-scratching, I attached some thread to the end of a length of piano wire, poked it down the wing to the bay and hooked the thread out with another bit of wire - success!teeth 2

Now I was back in business. The servo bay base is the inside of the top sheeting - just a single skin of 1.5mm balsa - so I decided to reinforce the sheet with a rectangle of glass cloth epoxied to it. This makes a much sturdier mount for the servo and hopefully reduces any chance of the glue joint failing in service. This bay had already been done - the cloth is for the other:

champ 060614 001 (1024x789).jpg

I'll tidy up that messy bit of ironing, I promise! I was trying to do three other, non-modelling-related, jobs at the time..embarrassed

Once that was dry, it was relatively simple job to wrap the servos in masking tape, roughed-up, and then mix up some 5min epoxy with micro-balloons and snug the servo into place - remembering to check the servo for serviceability, enlarge the arm hole for the 2mm pushrod, centre the servo and fit the arm retaining screw first! Looking at how that 31mm high micro servo fits in the bay, I'm sure anything larger would be a bit of a squeeze:

champ 060614 003 (1024x779).jpg

I've not used the supplied GRP servo arms - they were slightly oversize for the depth of the aileron, anyway. I've used Radio Active Small Control Horns which I had in the bits box.

The servo cover will be taped on once final setting-up is done.

More soon...


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, back to the elevator horn arrangement. Once I'd connected everything up, things were not good. The moulded snake exit on the side of the fin was calculated for the designed connector - the bent wire in tube arrangement. As a result, using the outermost hole on the horn to minimise throw to +/- 6mm meant a fairly significant deflection of the 22SWG snake inner.

The effect was that I had two neutrals, depending on which way I moved the elevator - and they were about 3 mm different.... smile o Clearly this is undesirable, so more head-scratching....

Eventually I came up with the following solution. I cut down a spare horn to a crescent shape, making a single clevis hole with sufficient clearance for the clevis movement. This was fitted further rearwards on the elevator, well behind the normal hinge-line. I also increased the snake inner gauge to 20SWG to reduce the risk of flexing with that unsupported length:

champ 060614 004 (1024x767).jpg

The net result is that I've reduced the disparity to negligible, fortunately - although it's far from the most satisfactory installation I've ever made...sad

We'll see how it goes.....


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Apart from taping on the servo covers (no photos) that was the Champ effectively finished - and very pretty she looks toosmile


Terry came up for a day's flying a week or so ago, so with all pre-flight checks done and with 428W and 37A on the 14x8 prop, with a 3S 4000mAh Zippy Compact, putting the C of G at 60mm from the l/edge, I had no choice but to maiden it, which was a rather shorter flight than anticipatedsmile o:

See, you get things as they are here, warts 'n all ...teeth 2
The sharp-eyed will notice that the prop wasn't braked - an oversight on my part - but it was probably a good thing as the Champ would have disappeared over the far hedge without it, I reckon...
A post-mortem revealed that the ESC function of the new, out-of-the-bag, Hobbywing Pentium 60A had failed a second or two after launch, which is a first for me - they have been very reliable. Fortunately the BEC continued working and the model was landed without any problems. Further examination shows that the ESC is warming up from the time it is switched on, so there is clearly an issue.
It has now gone to the place where troublesome things go and, reassured by the 37A max drawn in testing,
has been replaced by a 40A Pentium.
During that short flight, Romford Rosie, inside the DX9, started nagging at me about 65535 frame losses. It eventually transpired that it was a telemetry settings fault rather than a problem but was enough to prompt me to move the 3 aerials to the outside of the fuselage, more for peace of mind than any particular issue:
champ aerials 001.jpg
The evening before last I got the chance to try her again and had a couple of short proving flights.
Was I impressed? You bet!teeth 2
A steady, purposeful climb-out to about 400ft, motor off, a touch of elevator up-trim and she was cruising serenely about in the calm evening air. A very flat glide slope was immediately evident - and being totally unfair - the Champ has probably consigned the Phoenix P2000 to history....wink 2
A stall-test was very benign with no tendency to drop a wing, probably a consequence of the conservative C of G. A test of the spoilerons at height showed rather too much down elevator, so after a couple of go-around approaches to get a feel for her, I brought her in clean on a very flat approach from across the valley and she landed within a few feet of me - very easy to control and well-mannered on the approach. The good thing was I was able to repeat this on the second flight, too.
Moving the C of G back to the recommended 65mm is the next stage - I'll report on that in due course.
Now looking forward to bagging a few thermals....teeth 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you are correct, Erf. Just ailerons on this one, which have been set up as spoilerons to kill a bit of lift when necessary.

There are few English threads about this model - most are on the German and Dutch forums - and the general concensus is that the spoilerons are adequate. Given a long low approach, I didn't find landing a problem the other evening, so once the spoilerons are properly set up, it should improve furtherthumbs up

I've got a flapped sailplane nearing completion at present and I was looking for a straightforward replacement for the Nebula, which would give me some relaxed thermalling - I think I've found it!teeth 2


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been pondering this assembly over a few days now.

It has struck me that it was more of a build than a simple assembly.

The other aspect that is exciting me, is the motor, I will be considering one myself for my Erfolg glider which at present has a Vector canned outrunner (rated max of 40 amp), which has to date provided a very lack lustre performance, particularly at this moment, where expectations have moved a lot in the past 7 or so years.

I do hope to read more about the motor performance as you experience the model.

With respect to air brakes, these days I will not go very high without them, but then again I never get high.

I guess being a modern model, the camber is very low, to provide a good speed range without ballasting. Is it this that will be used to get down? Reflexed draggy tips and high speed, shallow dive?

Edited By Erfolg on 29/06/2014 12:10:49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Erf, it's a bit more than 'Plug and Play'smile

Fitting out a GRP fus is rather different from a balsa/ply construction and requires a bit of imaginative thinking sometimes.

Early days for the motor so far. There seems to be plenty of power but I don't think it sounds quite as smooth as I would expect an MVVS to sound - there's a trace of harshness at at one point in the throttle range.

The spoilerons should help with encouraging a descent but on the occasions when I've encountered massive lift, where no amount of braking will bring it down, I've found the only guaranteed way of getting out of the lift is to put in a couple of clicks of down elevator trim and fly in a straight line, upwind. I clean up the wing to speed up the process - the quicker you get out of the lift, the better. As you know, steep diving is a no-no with thermallers!

The wing section is Selig 3021 - not too highly regarded here (although if Dick Edmonds liked it that's good enough for mesmile) but these chaps seem to like it.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spinning is probably the best, safe method of bringing down a glider, that's not equipped with dedicated spoilers of some type, when it's got too high for comfort. Spinning is more effective than spoilerons & of course can also be used with R/E only models.

I find side-slipping a very good method of landing in restricted spaces. Again often more effective than spoilerons & possible to do with R/E models.
For REA models - rudder is applied to make the model yaw, the resulting bank is countered with opposite aileron then as the model drifts off course the rudder & aileron inputs are reversed - this is repeated as often as necessary until the model can be landed straight ahead.
It's less tidy with RE only as the model is "tacked" from side to side each time the bank reaches about 20 - 30 degrees.
With both REA & RE the nose will drop at the end of each "tack" but the next direction change will bring it up & elevator is only used sparingly if necessary.
Much easier to do than to explain.

Edited By PatMc on 29/06/2014 21:21:04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly agree that S3021 is a good section, my own EMP 3m Algebra uses the section. I had not thought of reflexing the ailerons to increase drag, limiting speed and reducing the effective lift. Txs just did not have the functions available today on quite low cost RC equipment. My Algebra does have trailing edge training edge plate type airbrakes. The trouble is that the brakes are operated via fishing wire trace wire, works, yet is not particularly engineered.

I used to like E205, although the speed range is not as good, without ballasting and you cannot do that once launched.

These days I like MH 32, low camber thin and really has a good speed range, it is only in totally dead air that a floater can compete. Allthough by flapping, just 1 or 2 mm, it becomes a pseudo floater section

I know that there many who believe that spinning is the answer, my own opinion is, I cannot be sure that it is a true spin when at a great height, Just as possible is that I would be in a spiral dive, from which in the past I have seen models break up. I have also heard the argument, go inverted, the higher drag will bring you down. Again, when you cannot see the model clearly, getting the most thermal gliders inverted and keeping it there is a lot easier to say, than i can do.

One of the problems I used to encounter is that once at height, the width of a thermal was often massive. Just simply cruising out of the thermal often just did not happen. You had to get the speed up and shift possibly 1/2 a mile to be confident you were not in good air. To do that a section like S3021 permitted made this viable. The real issue (back then) you needed to have marked your trim with a fast cruise mark. Or if you did what i did the once, lean on the stick, more often and not, you became aware that your model was not there any more, oh, the wings are fluttering down and what is that screaming noise, did the earth move then and the subsequent sentence, I cannot get the fuselage out of the ground, which becomes, well that CF and Kevlar really is strong.

It will be very interesting to read about how you have set the model up, and how it gas performed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They come with the AR9300 Rx, which has extended aerials for carbon fuselages, John. That Rx has now been replaced by the AR9310. The antenna exit guides can be purchased separately. I'm sure, with a bit of Googling, similar can be found in the wider RC market.

I'd agree with Pat that a properly developed spin is probably likely to cause least stress on an airframe. However, particularly at a distance and with a conservative C of G, it is much more likely to become a spiral dive, which will surely re-kit the model long before it reaches anything hard and unforgiving, as Erf points out.... smile

I'd rather fly purposefully upwind, with just a touch of down trim (not 'leaning on the stick', Erf!teeth 2) and at some point the lift will become sink. If it's not happening, then just fly crosswind until it does. All the time, the model is descending and, most importantly, it is in one piece. Sooner or later you'll be out of the lift - and then you can let the old ticker slow down...teeth 2


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread Pete. Mine needs fitting with a new X8R receiver and I have a vario and voltage sensor to go in too. Interesting that the motor is not so smooth. I did baulk at paying out for the MVVS but I have to say it was well worth it, it is exceptionally smooth and eerily quiet on a 12 x 8 folder. I see you have gone for the next size up - mine is the 3.6 960 and she climbs very well on that so yours should be very spirited. I had the same issue with the actuation of the elevator and ended up fitting a ball link as there was a little sideways movement which seems to be working well. As you have found, it has a very flat glide and getting down from height or at least out of lift can be a problem. The only time I have had it scarily high, I used the throttle trim to start the motor at just a few rpm's as the extra drag seemed to help along with the spoilerons and a very small amount of down had her in sink and down fairly swiftly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just butt into this thread with a couple of pictures of my Big Swift which I got from the RCME classified, complete with all servos, 40A Jeti ESC and a Jeti phasor motor, only 2m wingspan, but when flying it with my mates foamies it feels like I'm cheating laugh



Only a 40A ESC and it pulls over 50A at WOT, but it goes vertical on half throttle at 27A (ain't telemetry great), so iIhave a spoken alarm at 30A. Bring it down for a fast pass and it certainly picks up some speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Pete B - Moderator on 30/06/2014 15:16:58:

I'd agree with Pat that a properly developed spin is probably likely to cause least stress on an airframe. However, particularly at a distance and with a conservative C of G, it is much more likely to become a spiral dive, which will surely re-kit the model long before it reaches anything hard and unforgiving, as Erf points out.... smile


It doesn't have to be a properly developed spin, so long as full up is held with full rudder the model shouldn't build up too much speed. Remember you only need to lose enough height to vacate the strongest part of the thermal.
If the model is so far distant that it's not possible to determine whether it has entered a spiral dive or not then said spiral dive is probably a safer option than a potential uncontroled fly away.

In the early days of BARCS 100S comps only rudder & elevator control was allowed so loops, rolls, inverted or spinning down were the only real options. (Show offs did inverted spins wink 2) I think most of us found that normal spinning was the safest & most effective way to lose the required altitude before preparing for a spot landing at as near to the max allowed duration time as possible.
The only models I remember breaking up whilst descending fast were those who had chosen to loop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I remember 100s competitions, with successful models, they were built like the proverbial brick outhouse. I have a damaged wing given to me from a Tracker, to provide a guide of how to build a strong wing, so strong I could stand on it between bricks. It is also the era where the thinner lower camber wings start to appear in numbers, to allow the very high speeds, yet with good low speed capability, initially E205 being the flavour of the month then the Selig to more recently MH 32 finding some favour, goodness knows what todays flavour is!

I remember that most if not all relied on being able to travel really fast, all the way down, although often done in stages as you entered the last few minutes.

I have never known a fly away, although i have seen the same model being flown by two people, on one occasion there were three. It taking a few minutes to sort out whose model it actually was and then spotters saying a model went in over there.

But this is not a competition, nor a competition model, it is not a modern glass wing, it is a compromise of strength to weight for a good all round performer, for leisure flying.

I have seen many claims of spins, and have not been convinced, that it was other than a spiral dive, from low altitude, which all were quickly aborted. My Flair Sunrise has a dethemalising tailplane, made I think by SLEC, it works, although the model is rubbish, a pure and limited floater.

No, I still favour moving out of the area, quickly. smiley

But as with all things with gliders, you have to set the model up well in advance of what you want it to do. Because at height, you cannot see what it is doing. Nowis the time to preset the crow brakes, if you have them. to a flick of a switch, for landing, loosing height and mixing in elevator etc. I see (or did see) others spending hours setting up, even more time getting to know the model and its capabilities and limitations. In the case of Peter the solution is the reflex. I also like the slow revs, that will really dirty the model up, that has been suggested. All sorted out before that little dot in the sky event.

I am sure that Peter is on the right lines.

Oh, the Big Swift is an excellent model, although imports seem to have stopped about 4 years back, there were two in the club, only the one now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete, getting back to the Champion - I like the neat job you've made of the installation in particular the way that you've installed the esc & lipos.

IMO the Champion is a really attractive model that Reichard have badly let down by the elevator linkage.
I've flown a clubmate's Champion a couple of times - it had 8xsub C nickels so the climb rate was rather sedate but the glide was nice & flat unfortunately without any thermal assistance when i flew it. However the elevator control was really wooly with double neutrals. Glad to hear that you've sorted that particular issue.

I built a Reichard Classic some time ago, it's smaller at 2.5metres with foam cored balsa covered wings & heavier than the Champion - mine weighs just over 2 Kg using 2300 3s lipos with an Axi 2820/10 driving a 10x6 prop. It's definitely not a floater, more of a "warm liner" though it is a good model for thermaling in our typicaly windy conditions.
I started a build thread a couple of years ago but didn't keep it up. The instructions in the kit were vague & in the case of the elevator linkage, impractical. Though the linkage is neater than the Champion's being actuated from a mini servo in the base of the fin. Rather than hijack this thread I'll add a few photos to my original blog.

Did you ever consider a mini servo installed in the base of the fin for elevator control at all ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erfolg, the early 100S gliders were often extremely light & not always very robust, I remember some with wing loadings around 5 or 6 oz/sq ft.
It was later when we realised the benifit of higher wing loadings that we began building them heavier, stronger & with ballast tubes built into the wings. The rules changed at some point to allow spoilers. I dropped out of comps by then & the only 100S model I still owned was converted to take ailerons. It still gets used occasionaly now but only for slope soaring. Since it weighs 5lbs "dry" I don't bother with ballast but despite a 14+oz/sq ft wing loading it's still good as a light wind slope soarer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...