Jump to content

Brian Taylor 72" Typhoon Build


richard dalgleish
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Advert


  • 2 months later...

I have just started to build the Hawker Typhoon purchased from Sarik and would like to join in on this very informative group.

 

I am a retired commercial pilot and have built a Sig Kadet and a 6ft Piper Cub. I am most interested in building scale RC models

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been a while since I posted, being working on the fuselage.

Ive decided to mount the servos above the tank and as far forward as possible as I need to get the tank as low as possible, it will mean having a cut out in the leading edge of the wing to the clear the tank.

More to follow.

IMG_0082.jpeg

IMG_0083.jpeg

IMG_0087.jpeg

IMG_0097.jpeg

IMG_0104.jpeg

IMG_0106.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, I have just purchased the Brian Taylor Typhoon kit from Sarik and have studied the plans.

Has Brian or anybody else produced a building instructions document?

If I have any specific questions about the construction can I ask them on this forum?

I have tried a number of times to contact the company Unitracks who make the retractable undercarriage. Do you have a current email address?

I have purchased the Saito FA 125a 4 stroke engine for the model. Do you know of anybody who has used this engine in a typhoon?

 

Thanks

Mike Nolan 

Sydney Australia

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, start your own thread on yours and it will get followed by others. Ask away about anything, people are always keen to offer their wisdom.

I can't comment on the BT Typhoon specifically, but i have built or at least have 3 or 4 BT plans. (And have built a different designer's Typhoon). I'm not aware of any specific building instructions document. Other builders threads will be about as good as you will get, there will be several on rcscalebuilder.com  All the instructions needed for a reasonably competent/experienced/enthusiastic builder are on his plans, as this is the modeler who he aimed his models at. If this isn't you, don't for one second let it put you off, just study things a bit more, and ask plenty of questions!

I don't know if unitracts are in existence anymore, others may comment. Unfortunately, re-engineering to accommodate different retracts is a common occurrence.

Re the Saito, a great choice. 

 

Edited by Dale Bradly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mike Nolan said:

Richard, I have just purchased the Brian Taylor Typhoon kit from Sarik and have studied the plans.

Has Brian or anybody else produced a building instructions document?

If I have any specific questions about the construction can I ask them on this forum?

I have tried a number of times to contact the company Unitracks who make the retractable undercarriage. Do you have a current email address?

I have purchased the Saito FA 125a 4 stroke engine for the model. Do you know of anybody who has used this engine in a typhoon?

 

Thanks

Mike Nolan 

Sydney Australia

 

 

Hi Mike

There are no build instructions with any of Brian’s plans, you’ll find all the details and info on the plans. Most people swap out the balsa wing braces for plywood and swap the balsa spars for hardwood but apart from that just follow the plan.

As far as I know Unitracts are no longer in business, so you are limited on choice of retracts, ideally they should be 96 degree units, the closest you’ll get off the shelf is 95 degrees. On my first Tyhoon I had some custom made, I’m just trying to decide whether to use them again or buy some Electron units.

As for your engine choice I think the Saito will be underpowered, my first Typhoon started life with a Saito 30 petrol then I swapped it out for a Laser 155. I’m using a Laser 155 this time. I have seen them flown on Laser 150s and 180s. Bear in mind the all up weight will be about 16lbs if you can keep the tail end weight down, my first one was 17lb including nearly 3lb of lead, saying that it flew great and landed at walking speed.

Regards

IMG_0135.jpeg

IMG_0134.jpeg

IMG_0133.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dale and Richard, thanks for your replies.

I have another question regarding the typhoon which relates to wing rib 5. On the plan view of the drawing, it shows the ply doubler on the inside of rib 5 and the bottom spar passing through the ply doubler. However, the ply doubler as supplied by Sarik in the kit does not have a cutout on the ply doubler for the spar. see attached pictures. The drawing also shows a second rib alongside of rib 5. Can you comment?

 

1368489017_typhoonrib5.thumb.JPG.1f7acff6353161487714576a078f7dfd.JPG

typhoon rib 5 2.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dale, Richard,

the drawing that shows the 1/4" by 1/4" front and rear top spars is joined at the centre by a splice joint. Am i correct in assuming that this joint is required to allow for the fact that the wing ribs do not have a uniform thickness, and the splice joint allows the spars to angle down towards the wing tip? The written comment on the drawing says" Top spar (similar for rear top spar" see photo.

 

A second question relates to the 'Hard balsa dihedral brace' which is shown on the drawing as being installed between Rib 6 and 4 passing through rib 5. I dont see how this is possible so obviously i am wrong or the drawing is. Can you advise? see photo

 

 

 

typhoon wing ribs.JPG

Typhoon wing spar dihedral bracket.JPG

Typhoon wing dihedral bracket 2.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
9 hours ago, Mike Nolan said:

Richard your photos are of great assistance. Have you built the wing yet and will you be posting photos of it.

regards mike nolan

Hi Mike

i haven’t built the wing yet, but I will be posting pics.

i have a load of pictures of my first Typhoon. PM me your email address and I will send you pictures, if you want me to.

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, I see you are a true scratch builder with cutting your own parts, do you use the pin method for marking the wood. The half formers on the plan make it hard for me. I do not mind cutting the parts but find the marking the wood the biggest challenge. I have a Traplet short kit for this plan, Tony Stephenson gave it to me when our house was destroyed in a fire. Still on my must build list 11 years on!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chris Freeman 3 said:

Richard, I see you are a true scratch builder with cutting your own parts, do you use the pin method for marking the wood. The half formers on the plan make it hard for me. I do not mind cutting the parts but find the marking the wood the biggest challenge. I have a Traplet short kit for this plan, Tony Stephenson gave it to me when our house was destroyed in a fire. Still on my must build list 11 years on!   

Hi Chris

I find the best method is to trace the parts, prick through with a pin and join the dots. The band saw makes light work of the cutting out the parts. 

The good thing about cutting your own parts is that you are in control of the wood quality, and it doesn't take that long to have a set of parts cut out.

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, John Rickett 102 said:

That's interesting Richard, why do you prefer the pin prick method instead of good old fashioned carbon paper?

Hi John

I don't think I have ever tried the carbon paper method, I do quite enjoy the pin pricking and dot joining.😃

Can you still buy carbon paper?

Richard

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard, I've a box of A4 sheets, enough to last until I'm 999 which is unlikely, pm your address and I'll send you some. I must have had this box for 30 years and despite building many models in that time, have only worn out a few - they last forever. 

My thoughts are that tracing through using carbon paper will only introduce one error, whereas the pinprick method could introduce two, one if the pinpricks are not exactly in the centre of the line and another when the dots are lined up with the french curve. If you use, say,  a red or green ball point pen, you can see on the plan all the lines that you've covered.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...