Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Hello everyone, I have a few questions regarding the UK made Magnum 4 stroke engines. I searched the internet, and found out that they also manufactured a 120 size single cylinder engine. A model engine collector told me that they also fabricated a 240 V twin, besides the 182 v twin engine. I assume I have a 240 v twin magnum, the place where normally 182 v is mentioned on the engine housing, is machined blank.. My engine has black cylinders, and red anodized cylinder heads. Also a 'US' type prop hub ( much bigger then the normal version) Could anyone enlighten me with some info please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Watkins Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Your photos Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 Posted January 18, 2017 Author Share Posted January 18, 2017 Many thanks, the right cylinder has some sort of alu disk, preventing the piston to hit the cylinder head! imagine that I guess manufacturing standards on these where not so high? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former Member Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 [This posting has been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 if you take a head off you can measure the bore/stroke and work out the capacity. Lovely looking engine, if you want to run it but are having trouble or need help let me know, its always fun to play with engines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 Posted January 19, 2017 Author Share Posted January 19, 2017 I measured the bore ,and that says 31 mm, and as the 91 cylinder bore was only 27mm, it really is a 240 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Some quick maths says you should have a stroke of about 26.5mm for it to be 20cc per pot and thus 40cc (or a 240) overall. As i cant find a manual for the old magnums i am not able to check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike T Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 It may be my fevered imagination, but didn't these guys (or somebody) use those pots in a 5-cylinder radial? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Flyer Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Lovely looker! Hmm we might have to persuade Laser to have an anodised option? 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 I might trade or sell the Magnum , we will see Edited By Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 on 20/01/2017 12:56:21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Dedeurwaerder 1 Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 There was a 3 cylinder radial magnum.. but those where 3 91 cylinders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former Member Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 [This posting has been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 I am working on the issue. We have done a handful of black anodised engines in the past and people love them. The silver black and red also looks really good but trying to convince my boss is another story as to him its just another cost. I suppose the question is if a coloured version of the engine was available, would customers be prepared to pay a small premium for it like saito do with their golden knight? As for Rays Radial, it was glow and about 150cc. A bit of a non starter from a commercial point of view these days, and in those days fewer people had models large enough to take one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solly Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 When these engines first appeared three of us from my flying group bought one, - they were not a success. Every one was eventually returned to the factory and I settled for a refund. One of the problems was the cams were too aggressive and the valve springs were not up to the job. After a short time the engine would suffer from valve bounce and since it was an interference engine the valves would come into contact with the piston, causing damage. There was also a problem with bottom end lubrication and all three engines developed damaged big ends. Also the carb was prone to icing up! You could see a layer of frost forming on the intake tube while the engine was running. I met the designer Peter Rolfe at Old Warden and he was a very nice chap. I suppose there was nothing wrong with the engines that couldn't be rectified but they disappeared after a time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 what rpm were you running them at? From the bore/stroke ratio I would have run them quite slowly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solly Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Hi Jon. I can't remember, this was many years ago. But I'm sure that we would have been using the recommended props and fuel, something I have always done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Lane Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 A little bit of history behind Magnum Engines. Magnum engines where made as a side line, by Custom Enclosures, Concorde Street, Luton, Beds, during the 80's to early 90's. The company was dissolved about 20 years ago. There was a 3 cylinder radial with a starter, and from my memory was spark ignition, running on petrol, that they where trying out. At that time, I was putting lot of precision engineering work their way, and as a thank you, they gave me the Magnum 91S that was shown at the Nuremburg Toy Fair 1988. A heavy engine and not as powerful as any of the competition, these engines where mostly seen on large vintage models. By swapping the valve push-rods, it could then run backwards ( clockwise ). When I came out of the hobby in 2003, I sold it along with all my other gear at the Watford swap meet. I hasten to add, that I'm well and truly back into the hobby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike T Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 Percy, In my minds eye, I was sure I'd seen an ad. by Magnum for a 5-cyl. version using the .91 pots - definitely not a Laser derivative. I'd heard of the Robinson (skew-gear driven rotary valve?) and a friend had a Vega .91 (sleeve valve?) but before I knew him. Apparently, rice puddings feared not for their skins... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Davies 4 Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 I have one of these Magnum 91`s kicking around somewhere and was going to put it in a GY20 Minicab , which I did start Years ago , and got about three quarters built , but never finished it , this was the engine i`m sure Dave Womersly used in his own model. My part built airframe is still kicking about gathering dust and a little bit of hangar rash over the years . Must finish that one, it`s a pretty little aeroplane. I must ask on here if anyone else has built a Minicab from the model world plan. Getting back to the Magnum, I may even sell it as they seem to fetch quite good money on fleecebay , unless someone convinces me to finish the Minicab and put it in that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Harris - Moderator Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 I don't think it went into production but I have actually held a 5 cylinder Magnum prototype, brought into work by a friend of one of the partners in the business. This may well have been what was featured in the advert. I have the plans of the Stearman that it was planned to put it in in my loft! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Harris - Moderator Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 I've checked with my source and there was a 7 cylinder radial under development when the company stopped producing engines - all the parts were made but it was never assembled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Putley 1 Posted January 23, 2017 Share Posted January 23, 2017 I have one of the early 90's Magnum's which I purchased new in the mid eighties. Fitted this in a vintage Goliath (it's fifty years old now). Which was flown as recently as last year. It doesn't compare with the Laser 75 which I had purchased previously. Would guess the power is similar to the Laser. It flies the Goliath with great authority. I use a 17x6 wooden prop, it is easy to start, and has never given me any problems, apart from the fact that the supplied plastic bodied carb would seize up during the winter. Solved that by swopping it for a carb from an Enya 60. Idle also doesn't compare to the Laser. Last year fitted an on board glow, I think from South Herts Models. Haven't said all that, I have a soft spot for this motor and always enjoy operating it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon H Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Posted by Martin Harris on 23/01/2017 13:52:17: I've checked with my source and there was a 7 cylinder radial under development when the company stopped producing engines - all the parts were made but it was never assembled. gimme gimme gimme, i will assemble it :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Harris - Moderator Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Ha - I've already probed that subject and the whereabouts are (currently) unknown. On top of which, you haven't got time to be messing about enjoying yourself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Fry Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 I have acquired, as a stoke of genius, or madness, a truely lovely Fiedler Storch, built from a Svenson kit circa 1980 to 83. I have sorted the fitted Multiplex gear fitted, thanks to Percy Verence, and is now on a fusion of Multiplex and Spectrum. It has a British built Magnum 91, open rocker 4 stroke fitted. On the basis, not broke don't fix, I will at least try the engine. I have no knowledge of engine history Three questions. I assume it runs on a standard modern fuel, 5 % nitromethane, correct? I think a six in pitch prop is good for this airframe, what diameter? If replaced, what is a modern equivalent for power. I am told, in its day it flew on this motor, but was not over powered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.