Jump to content

Petrol Engine for a Toot Sweet


Robin Stevens
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am currently building a Toot Sweet (Peter Miller, RCM&E September 2002) and I'm thinking of putting a Petrol engine in the nose instead of the recommended glow.

**LINK**

This will be my first venture into Petrol, the relative cleanness and the cost and availability of fuel is attractive but I don't know what the best option for a plane of this size would be. I will admit that my knowledge on this type of engine is low, that's why I'm posting the thread.

The plan suggests a 0.35 to 0.40 glow 2-stroke, or a 0.40 - 0.48 4-stroke. Does petrol suffer a performance penalty compared to glow or are they broadly equivalent, requiring a larger engine? Are petrol engines in this size available or should I just put a 9cc in and have almost unlimited performance?

Currently the airframe is half built and is a winter project lined up. I would like to finish it for next year to give me something aerobatic to work with and flesh out the variety in my hangar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


I beieve that the smallest commecial petrol engines are around .60 which is rather big for Toot Sweet,

However Just Engines can supply ingniytion systems to convert any engine to petrol. The job is not hard and might be a good option although you do have to fit about 4 ounces of extra equipment but that would apply to any ignition engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the main problems with running small engines on petrol revolve around carburation and cooling.

Glow carbs are extremely simple devices which work acceptably when metering the relatively large volumes of fuel used relative to petrol. As the metering involves tapered needles, you will probably find that the adjustment minimum of one click on the knurled body is too coarse to achieve an accurate mixture setting. Walbro type carbs work well in larger sized engines but aren't really suitable for anything smaller than a .60 - and maybe .90s upwards are better suited and getting something suitable for an engine conversion may involve a large amount of luck as there is so much variety and lack of info from the makers.

Petrol engines also need more cooling as the fuel burns hotter and as the finning on a glow engine is designed to maintain the correct temperature range for methanol fuel, will be far less tolerant of any inadequacies in cooling air flow. I also have an inkling that vapour locking could contribute to problems due to the higher temperatures and higher vapour pressure of petrol vs methanol.

 

Edited By Martin Harris on 15/09/2019 12:55:07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robin, I think if Jon (Mr Laser engines) was contributing to this thread he would advise you against trying to convert a small glow engine to petrol for all the reasons Martin outlined above, plus a few more no doubt. Probably any quality 4st engine between 40 and 60 size will be much less bother, lighter and QUIETER than a small petrol two stroke.

If it is cleanness and less cost you want why not go electric?devil

Edited By Piers Bowlan on 15/09/2019 19:34:08

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin explains it very well I think. Methanol is a wonderful fuel with a high latent heat of evaporation that helps draw heat from the engine. It also has a very high octane and resists pre ignition much better than petrol and allows us to use higher compression ratios and high rpm . It does require a much richer mix than petrol to burn but that is still an advantage as the fatter mixture extracts more heat . Petrol has a much higher heat or energy value than methanol ( about 10 times as much ) but it requires much more oxygen to burn so needs a far leaner mix . The difference between methanol and petrol mix, is that the petrol mixture requires around twice as much oxygen for a given amount of fuel. For smaller IC engines is very hard to beat glow for simplicity easy handing and performance.

Edited By Tim Flyer on 15/09/2019 20:59:34

Edited By Tim Flyer on 15/09/2019 21:12:19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the recommendations I think I'm going to go with the SC 0.40 two stroke glow that I have from another aircraft that I'm retiring. Looking forward to having the toot sweet finished, everything I've heard about it makes me think it'll be a fun flyer.

My club isn't fussy about noise, we're fortunate in being in the middle of nowhere. A trusty glow 2-stroke will likely give me all the power I could need and be relatively practical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...