Jump to content

YT / ESM Hurricane - Laser 200 in-line twin


Recommended Posts

Shame about the arrival at the end but wobbly servos wont help. Could the pitch up be caused by the throttle servo putting pressure on the elevator? 

 

Anyway the backfiring at high power is symptomatic of one cylinder going a smidge lean. When this has happened to one of mine its always been debris in the needle but it could be other things like the rear pot getting warm with the cowl off and no ducting. 

 

On props, given the performance expected from a Hurricane even a 20x8 apc might be an option. 6800rpm should be more than enough and i was impressed with the power available on the 18x8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the elevators and rudder are on a pull/ pull system I don’t think that the application of throttle would cause the pitching up as both wires would have gone slack. My feeling is that increasing the throttle caused  a lack of movement of those controls as could be seen on the landing in the vid. But I can only guess at this!


I think that I need to get it up in the air again to see how it performs with the servos fixed in position, I don’t want to be making any changes until after that flight. I will add a switchable mix, throttle/ elevator, just in case it still pitches up but I’m interested to know if the backfiring problem is still there. As a precaution, and based on your comments, I’ll check both carbs for any grunge before the next flight too.

 

Regarding the power, whilst I didn’t try it, in its present configuration it felt like it would have excellent vertical performance!

Edited by Ron Gray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot most ESM models are pull pull. I suppose any down trim you might have had would have been lost if the wires went slack? 

 

Still, i agree that changes should be minimal until tested again with the servo tray issue sorted out. 

 

Was the engine damaged in the nose over? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All rear end trim was lost, in the end I was flying with full down on the elevator stick, which was interesting!

 

No damage to the engine, in fact the damage was minimal:

 

Prop, not broken but slightly tipped and a few notches (it's now in the bin)

Spinner, a few scratches.

Fuse, can't see any signs of impact but would I see them given the rubbed down / weathered look it sports?

Wing, ditto.

U/C, bore the brunt of the landing resulting in bent axles and bent stub oleos (the bit that slides inside the main legs).

U/C, oleo retaining screw sheared (the little screw that retains the stub in the legs)

Servo tray, broken loose.

 

All of the above have now been fixed with the exception of the oleo retaining screw which I need to drill out. I've got some small Carbide drill bits coming today in case it proves to be a bit difficult. It's not the end of the world as I have identical oleos sitting in my U/C spares drawer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jon - Laser Engines said:

On props, given the performance expected from a Hurricane even a 20x8 apc might be an option. 6800rpm should be more than enough and i was impressed with the power available on the 18x8

Just looked at my prop collection and whilst I don't have any APCs in those sizes I do have Xoar and Menz wooden ones in both 19x8 and 20x6.

Edited by Ron Gray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought I'd just check the engine running before taking it up to the field tomorrow. The rear pot was running a tad lean on the high needle so turned that out a bit and running fine on WOT, 8200 RPM on the APC 18x8. Tried the 19x8 Menz and it didn't like it all, fluffing and rough running at anywhere above ½ throttle so I didn't bother re-tuning as I'm more than happy with the APC for tomorrow.

Edited by Ron Gray
Auto speeling incorrect
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having fixed the servo tray I decided to change the tailwheel pushrod arrangement as it wasn’t preventing the tailwheel from moving around quite a bit. So a thicker gauge wire plus spring buffers was installed which made it a lot stiffer but still with shock absorbing. 
 

B79283DF-E7B1-4EB7-BBE0-EFA34ABBB25C.thumb.jpeg.ebcceac06c275b9b8c05eaeed2db39f0.jpeg

 

So to the next flight. I changed the prop to an APC 18x8W and decided to fly with the damaged canopy (I didn’t have time to fit the new one). Unfortunately the canopy came off mid flight which forced me to land and this is the video. Having checked everything over I did take it out for another flight later in the day and can confirm that the climbing under power plus the backfiring have now disappeared so it must have been the servo tray coming loose that caused those problems. I need to setup a landing mode on the Tx as I need more elevator authority to flare. I also need to re-tune the engine as it is really messy with lots of oil from both the exhausts and the oil breather, it’s nowhere near as clean as my 2 other in-line twin Lasers!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Following on from the canopy incident I decided that I would try a different approach with adding the framework to the new one. I set to work designing and 3D printing the framework which not only looks better than the aluminium tape (imo) it has given it a bit more strength too! I really must set some time aside to re-do the cockpit details as they are more than a bit 'wrong'.

 

IMG_7324.thumb.jpeg.dba4da4b5ef57849acd91585ab9616f7.jpeg

 

I have been pondering over the tropical filter for the underside of the cowl in order to hide the front cylinder of the Laser 200 in-line twin and this has caused a lot of head scratching as its position and size won't be too scale like (but does that really matter on as ESM Hurricane????) plus making sure that both pots get their cooling from it is also giving me a headache. As a result I hadn't got on with the in cowl ducting but I decided to crack on with that as I've engineered a Naca duct for the rear pot which will allow me to fly the beast with the cowl fitted whilst I still deliberate over a Vokes filter. The internal baffles are glassed ply.

 

The keen eyed amongst you will also note that I've changed the silencers back to the standard 'long' type rather than the 'short pot' ones, which means that the exhausts are pointing down rather than to the side.

 

IMG_7323.thumb.jpeg.dbab1947ee2c246a2056a55b55fdbe6f.jpeg

 

What is not shown in this photo are the 2 temp sensors I've fitted to monitor the temperature differential between the 2 cylinders whilst it's flying.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the Hurri up to the patch today and retuned the engine as it was running too rich resulting in a very messy airframe. Having done that I then fitted the naca duct equipped cowl and took off, completing an 8 minute flight flown at very near to or full throttle for most of it. Checking my telemetry shows that the rear cylinder head recorded a max temp of 90°C (bearing in mind that the sensors are not actually touching the head this is a bit on the low side) which was only approximately 5° higher than the front one. My conclusion is that the naca duct plus cowl baffles are working! It also sounded better (imo) with the standard silencers in place.

 

F9D7A1A9-031E-4B31-AFE7-A5F9C76D1D1B.thumb.jpeg.877e77b1862cbcc23fcca1c79181ee4d.jpeg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that I said that with the 3D printed frame parts it now appears a lot stronger, well today I got chance to prove it! After a nice touch down I was coming to the end of the tail up part when a wheel got caught in something which made it flip nose over onto the canopy and fin. The canopy survived that little mishap!

Edited by Ron Gray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally I would say yes but in this case the canopy is for an 88” span Hurri which I’ve then cut down for the 82” one so the scale geometry is not quite right! The best thing would be to measure the canopy sides against my design then scale the sides, ditto the front ¼ panels, the windshield and the top frames. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I flew the Hurri on Monday but when I came to pack up there was a lot of oily mess in the underside of the fuselage and I’d only flown three 8 minute flights, which, for a Laser running the low oil fuel, was most unusual. The only problem is that due to the breather out let being quite close to the exhaust I couldn’t really tell where the oil was coming from. The fuel mixture has been leaned off so I called Jon at Laser and he suggested to either blank off the breather or fit a catch tank for the next flight so that I could see where the oil was coming from. I decided on the catch tank option and was able to fit a 2oz fuel tank behind the engine with a hole in one side for the breather nipple, the whole thing being trapped against the bulkhead when I tighten the motor mount.

 

677362B8-CCBB-4858-805A-3D2012347FEA.thumb.jpeg.eb80b6d65f2e2f0036cceb0417bfb964.jpeg

 

D140418B-FB93-490B-AFA8-0ABF974366BA.thumb.jpeg.09ca30e4619af69fb45b70680a978325.jpeg

 

You can just see the breather nipple inside the tank

 

93D1819A-FC7A-4F56-959F-7EF31BFAAB08.thumb.jpeg.d792e1d0067d9ad333413bdf1698a651.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...