Jump to content

Apprehensively Returning to RC after 20 years... where to start


Amazing Skies
 Share

Recommended Posts

G'day Folks,

I can't believe it has been 20 years - and so much has changed. The story is probably familiar - flew Sport Models [from 074 to 46 sizes], Sports Pylon, Combat planes, various electrics including 3D depron - almost everything built from plans or scratch built. [The Gremlins we built and flew are some of my fondest memories].

 

Work, family and stuff generally dragged me away and I went on to other things. Still have a few engines and electrical things I kept [Oh, throw in an Astro Hog kit and a bit of a balsa stash too] but with Australia now on 2.4ghz the old JR radio is obsolete. I lived in country Queensland back then but we relocated to the northside of Brisbane about 4 years ago.

 

There seems to be a few clubs within and hour's drive so I'll be checking them out and I'll probably go electric since it's so much more viable now. Currently searching through free plans and articles etc. online - generally getting a feel for things. I can't find much "Australia Specific" content here but I'm sure there's got to be some.

 

Will this work out? Hope so

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert


Welcome back 😉

 

For me, the big hitters in no particular order, are:

 

2.4 GHz radio

 

Open source radio operating systems. OpenTx and latterly EdgeTx

 

Electric propulsion

 

Increased regulation

 

Multi-rotor

 

Foam models (foamies)

 

It’s still a wonderful and diverse hobby

 

Cheers

 

Graham (UK)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Graham Bowers said:

Not very lucky in your club ?-)

Our club has been going for 25 years with between 45 and 75 + members, one caught his finger in the prop ( 10cc ) while tuning and that was a Helicopter rescue as blood was pumping out everywhere, on the other he whacked his hand on his Helicopter blade on a big 26cc Lama, not being used to flying any helicopter bigger than a .60 size, both over 60 years old.,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

Our club has been going for 25 years with between 45 and 75 + members, one caught his finger in the prop ( 10cc ) while tuning and that was a Helicopter rescue as blood was pumping out everywhere, on the other he whacked his hand on his Helicopter blade on a big 26cc Lama, not being used to flying any helicopter bigger than a .60 size, both over 60 years old.,,,

Be carefull mentioning age Paul mods don't like it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

              Just get back in there, most modelers have some time out in their lives. As there are clubs around you check them out and find one with the sort of flying you are interested in. I am sure members will guide you in the latest stuff.

Good luck.  John.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome back AS, it remains a great hobby of so many parts and I'm sure you'll fit back in just fine. Get involved as much or as little as your fancy/time/funds take you. In my opinion, joining a club is all part and parcel of it and can really enhance one's enjoyment of the hobby. Doesn't always work out that way as we've heard from a few folks who wouldn't join a club even if their life depended on it - a few clubs are a bit odd when it comes to new members, but most will be welcoming and only too happy to help and have new faces involved without any bother at all.

Hopefully you'll have a few within a reasonable drive, although on our tiny and overpopulated island we just don't get the scale of distances in Australia. Out of idle curiosity, I just had a look at the Australian Model Flying Association's website and you don't appear to have a great deal of choice in your neck of the woods. Hopefully you'll get lucky.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your responses. Yes, Australia is a very different place and distance - we just deal with it. I've always been amazed by the model scene in the UK with the options available, it must be fantastic. 20 years ago my 2 'local' flying club fields were 80+ km away and Saturday morning arriving at 6am to fly was normal. There's [at least] 2 model aircraft bodies here Model Aeronautical Association of Queensland [MAAQ] which is part of MAAA and Australian Miniature Aerosports Society [AMAS] and a few other specialist associations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Graham Bowers said:

Welcome back 😉

 

For me, the big hitters in no particular order, are:

 

2.4 GHz radio

 

Open source radio operating systems. OpenTx and latterly EdgeTx

 

Electric propulsion

 

Increased regulation

 

Multi-rotor

 

Foam models (foamies)

 

It’s still a wonderful and diverse hobby

 

Cheers

 

Graham (UK)

 

Yes indeed Graham, 2.4 GHz radio is a good thing - I've just found out about open source radio systems and haven't read much yet but it sounds interesting. It is a great hobby and I've got a lot of catching up to do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, David Davis said:

Welcome to the forum!

 

If you find an an Australian sports model please let me know. I spent five years in Oz mostly working in  the bush for the ANR.

Davis, there's a bunch of Australian sports models. - I could have shared a few but let my big bundle of plans go a long time ago. Airborne magazine had a huge inventory of plans but it's gone now and I can't find any information. Someone somewhere must have their stuff. I'll be trawling through my old hard drives looking for CAD files etc. Hopefully I'll find some useful stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Amazing Skies said:

 

Yes indeed Graham, 2.4 GHz radio is a good thing - I've just found out about open source radio systems and haven't read much yet but it sounds interesting. It is a great hobby and I've got a lot of catching up to do

If you're happy contemplating a bit of a steep learning curve, OpenTx  (OTX) is wonderful, everything is freely configurable. I was a multiplex profi 4000 user and that was similarly configurable however multiplex lost their way in my opinion and their competitors ate their lunch.

 

Many of the youtube channels are hyping EdgeTx (ETX) however I'm sticking with OpenTx for the moment. Although I have just bought a Radiomaster TX16S with a 4 into 1 internal module. (It came with ETX however I flashed it with OTX). It'll bind to many 2.4 GHz protocols. So far I've bound it to 3 brands of Rx. Multiplex, Spektrum (in a Mobula6) and FrSky. Although FrsKy keep changing their protocols and not all are backwards compatible.

 

Anyway, I only mention this to give you some start points for your reading / watching.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Graham Bowers said:

If you're happy contemplating a bit of a steep learning curve, OpenTx  (OTX) is wonderful, everything is freely configurable. I was a multiplex profi 4000 user and that was similarly configurable however multiplex lost their way in my opinion and their competitors ate their lunch.

 

Many of the youtube channels are hyping EdgeTx (ETX) however I'm sticking with OpenTx for the moment. Although I have just bought a Radiomaster TX16S with a 4 into 1 internal module. (It came with ETX however I flashed it with OTX). It'll bind to many 2.4 GHz protocols. So far I've bound it to 3 brands of Rx. Multiplex, Spektrum (in a Mobula6) and FrSky. Although FrsKy keep changing their protocols and not all are backwards compatible.

 

Anyway, I only mention this to give you some start points for your reading / watching.

Thanks Graham. It's odd to see how the radio business has changed with technology. JR, Multiplex and Futaba were the main players. I'll try to get up to speed with the new technology - steep learning curve ahead. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Graham Bowers said:

If you're happy contemplating a bit of a steep learning curve, OpenTx  (OTX) is wonderful, everything is freely configurable. I was a multiplex profi 4000 user and that was similarly configurable however multiplex lost their way in my opinion and their competitors ate their lunch.

 

Many of the youtube channels are hyping EdgeTx (ETX) however I'm sticking with OpenTx for the moment. Although I have just bought a Radiomaster TX16S with a 4 into 1 internal module. (It came with ETX however I flashed it with OTX). It'll bind to many 2.4 GHz protocols. So far I've bound it to 3 brands of Rx. Multiplex, Spektrum (in a Mobula6) and FrSky. Although FrsKy keep changing their protocols and not all are backwards compatible.

 

Anyway, I only mention this to give you some start points for your reading / watching.

The latest version of EdgeTX (flying dutchman) is well worth a look - some extra functionality, but a much improved user interface.  And you get to use the touchscreen, if you want.  Most of all though, the developers fully support this so any bugs are fixed..... OpenTX is stagnant now.  The basic functionality and mindset of OpenTX lives in EdgeTX.

 

Another shout-out for the TX16S - great piece of kit that allowed me to keep using receivers from Spektrum, FrSky, FlySky, Futaba, Lemon, Orange plus simple clones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GrumpyGnome said:

The latest version of EdgeTX (flying dutchman) is well worth a look - some extra functionality, but a much improved user interface.  And you get to use the touchscreen, if you want.  Most of all though, the developers fully support this so any bugs are fixed..... OpenTX is stagnant now.  The basic functionality and mindset of OpenTX lives in EdgeTX.

 

Another shout-out for the TX16S - great piece of kit that allowed me to keep using receivers from Spektrum, FrSky, FlySky, Futaba, Lemon, Orange plus simple clones.

 

I do get the bells and whistles of EdgeTx however wonder if OpenTx is now "stable" (positive connotations) as opposed to "stagnant" (negative connotations)? I do know that as it's open source the devs are volunteers and are probably tempted by the sexy stuff in Edge!

 

I'll admit to not being an early adopter of anything and am still running OTX 2.1.8 of 2016 vintage on my Taranis. It works just fine.

 

I'm now on OTX  2.3.15 of 2022 vintage on my TX16S and in all probability would have left it on Edge (that it came with) if I hadn't been on a new learning curve with the stabilised S6R Frsky receiver. So I bottled it and flashed OTX so at least I was on more familiar ground.

 

I'm also a little bit cynical and wonder if some of the enthusiasm for EdgeTx on the popular youtube channels has a smidgen of chasing hits? A video saying "Edge is good, but so is OTX" doesn't whip up quite the same froth as an "out with the old, in with the new" stance.

 

In reality, I've toyed with the idea of a second TX16S so I can play with Edge as well 😉

 

Anyway, neither is right or wrong, they're just different. And something for the OP to ponder 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...