Jason Hyland Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Hi all, I'm building an AcroWot with this setup from 4 max It's essentially a 595KV motor running on a 4s with a 14x7 APC e-prop. My last test was to see the power output via the watt meter. With a fresh charge I was getting just over 600W, roughly 50-60% of what I was expecting. I'm not sure if I've done something stupid, but I'm confused. I can't seem to calibrate the throttle range on the ESC as it doesn't seem to need it - first time I've come across that, but I wondered if that was the problem? Any suggestions please!? Regards, Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyinBrian Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 The motor specs say 5s to 8s batteries, perhaps a 4 cell pack just isn't enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Hyland Posted August 13, 2016 Author Share Posted August 13, 2016 Posted by FlyinBrian on 13/08/2016 14:46:27: The motor specs say 5s to 8s batteries, perhaps a 4 cell pack just isn't enough. Hi, thanks for replying. It's a bit weird, the specs do indeed say that, but they also say this for the motor Prop 14x7 - 4S LiPo 13x6.5 - 5S LiPo Also, the "kit" was supplied with a 3300 4S Part Number Description Price Qty Acro Wot EP/GP (Balsa) (airframe only) Acro Wot EP/GP (Balsa) (airframe only) (RRP £139.99) £125.99 Acro Wot EP/GP (Balsa) (electric conversion kit A-CF007/ELP) Acro Wot EP/GP (Balsa) (electric conversion kit) (RRP £19.99) £18.99 Acro Wot EP/GP (Balsa) Power Set Motor PO-5055-595 ESC PP-TESC60AU Prop APCE 14x7 (RRP £111.30) £99.99 LiPo Battery 4 cell (14.8V) 40C rated, 3.300mAh LiPo Battery £43.99 Servos 4x Servo XL-38HMB £41.96 I have emailed George at 4-max, so hopefully he can put me right. Edited By Jason Hyland on 13/08/2016 14:55:01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Hyland Posted August 13, 2016 Author Share Posted August 13, 2016 Perhaps I am OK ? I just weighed the AcroWot all up she weighs in at 6.2 llbs, so with about 620W of power this gives me exacty 100watts/llb which I think is about "right" for a sport plane intending to do mild aerobatics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iqon Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 !00w per lb is not that much for a sport plane, you want closer to 200w but maybe thats just me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Colman Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 I'm with iqon here. 100w per lb would be very anemic for an Acrowaot. I fly a Spacewalker which weighs in at just under 5.76 lbs. On 4S it gives 700W at 45A which = 121W per lb. This is just about adequate for general flying but not sufficient for aerobatics. I would consider 150W per lb a minimum to do justice to, and to make the most of, a model such as the Acrowot. Steve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatMc Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Battery capacity is seems also low for decent flight duration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Bott - Moderator Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Good grief how times have changed. It wasn't long ago we only dreamed of 100w/lb. Then it became a really good rule of thumb. That was using brushed motors and really heavy batteries where the drive train was at best 60℅ efficient.Today we have lighter systems and much higher efficiency. 100w/lb is plenty. 200w/lb is unlimited vertical and 3d territory. I think you'll be fine on that setup, although I think I'd be looking for more battery capacity for longer flights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Watkins Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 We cannot rewrite the "needs" chart to suit what we have. 100 watts per pound has worked fine up until now, so beware newbies reading that 200 watts per lb is the target. Also, 6.2 lb seems quite heavy for such a small model/missile I think a good target for the model would be 4 - 4.5 lb And in that case, Georges/4 max set up would work fine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kc Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 I agree with Denis - 100 watt per pound is OK and 6.2. pounds is heavy for an Acro Wot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Just run through a similar kv motor and that prop on a 4s battery on ECalc and it says 600 watts, so with that combo there's nothing wrong with your system, also says around 3 kg (6.6lbs) static thrust, so you've got 1:1 static thrust, probably not good for pulling out of a prop hang but it won't be lacking for normal flying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Hyland Posted August 13, 2016 Author Share Posted August 13, 2016 Thanks for the replies, all useful. A couple of things spring to mind. First 6.2 llbs is the weight of the assembled ARTF, plus battery, esc, motor, rx and servos. There is nothing special about these, so I can't see how a comparable mk2 kit would come in much less ? I'm not sure exactly what I could do to lighten ? Any suggestions where to look - perhaps the motor is quite heavy (303g) ? I guess until I fly her, I can't really tell if 100w/llbs is enough. Doesn't feel it from what I've read, but I will defer to those with the experience I'm worried what I'll have in the "tank" towards the end of the flight - at about 3.8v/cell I got about 450watts ! I will weigh her again - I did have one set of scales tell me it weighed almost 20llbs - needless to sat those aren't being used any more! Regards, Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Harris - Moderator Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 I wonder whether this sudden reduction in the effectiveness of Watts is due to the size/weight of what is perceived as a normal electric model? I too remember when 100 W/lb was regarded as rather spirited and "expert" territory - and it wasn't all that long ago! However, models were typically in the 40 inch range and constructed with great regard for lightness. As we probably all know, as size goes up, so does acceptable wing loading and power required increases consequentially. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Hyland Posted August 13, 2016 Author Share Posted August 13, 2016 Posted by Frank Skilbeck on 13/08/2016 20:18:58: Just run through a similar kv motor and that prop on a 4s battery on ECalc and it says 600 watts, so with that combo there's nothing wrong with your system, also says around 3 kg (6.6lbs) static thrust, so you've got 1:1 static thrust, probably not good for pulling out of a prop hang but it won't be lacking for normal flying. Thanks Frank, I did find a chart which showed a 4s on a 550 kv giving almost 3kg thrust so I figured it would be enough. Didn't know about ecalc, one to investigate! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 A 14 x 8 shows 44A and 3.2kg a 15 x 8, 54A and 3.7kg and as your motor is rated for 59A and you have a 60A ESC you've got some room for maneuver. I've just built a 3.2m ASK11 motor glider and I'm running it on a 13 x 6, 800kv motor on a 4s and it takes off on 60% power and climbs quite rapidly pulling just over 30 amps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff S Posted August 13, 2016 Share Posted August 13, 2016 Posted by Jason Hyland on 13/08/2016 20:27:06: Thanks for the replies, all useful. A couple of things spring to mind. First 6.2 llbs is the weight of the assembled ARTF, plus battery, esc, motor, rx and servos. There is nothing special about these, so I can't see how a comparable mk2 kit would come in much less ? I'm not sure exactly what I could do to lighten ? Any suggestions where to look - perhaps the motor is quite heavy (303g) ? I guess until I fly her, I can't really tell if 100w/llbs is enough. Doesn't feel it from what I've read, but I will defer to those with the experience I'm worried what I'll have in the "tank" towards the end of the flight - at about 3.8v/cell I got about 450watts ! I will weigh her again - I did have one set of scales tell me it weighed almost 20llbs - needless to sat those aren't being used any more! Regards, Jason I've bought a set of hand-held digital scales sold to weigh luggage - presumably for flying (in a full-size aeroplane of course, not the luggage on its own ). I find it invaluable for weighing medium sized models with sling round the wing. You can even off-set the weight of the sling and it can be set for either metric or imperial units. They were pretty cheap and remove the problem of trying to balance the model on the scales in such a way as to allow the read-out to be visible. 100 watts/lb is perfectly acceptable for reasonable aerobatic performance. If you want to prop hang then you will need more. It'll certainly fly well enough for you to assess the performance and take appropriate steps. My one reservation is the battery capacity. As Pat says, duration will be limited. I anticipate my Ballerina to weigh about 4.5/5 lbs (just over 2kg) and the current set up on 4S draws 30 amps on a 12x6 prop ie roughly 450 watts. As the motor is rated at 50 amps and the esc 60 amps I have plenty of headroom to get more power with a bigger prop but I'll probably test fly it with the 12x6. It's approaching test flight time so I'll soon know. Geoff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangster Posted August 14, 2016 Share Posted August 14, 2016 .Jason the 600 watts you are getting sounds reasonable time me for. 4s although I have not closely looked at the spec of the motor. You cannot get a quart out of a pint pot. you suggest you are expecting 1000 to 1200 watts. If you were to prop it to achieve that you would be looking to draw Iro of 80 Amps The esc would not like that nor would the duration of the flight be that long. All of the parameters of the motor must be within limits not just max power. The answer lies in speaking to the motor supplier and taking their recommendation re battery prop etc. You may even need to go to 5s I am sure the acrowot would fly on the set up you have try it and decide later if you need more power there will always be those that tell you that you need 1200 watts to fly an aw they are probably the electric version of those who insist they need a 90 or 120 glow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Hyland Posted September 3, 2016 Author Share Posted September 3, 2016 Hi all, I thought I'd report back after a few weeks flying the AcroWot. This setup works like a charm. I regulalry get 7-8 minutes of flight that includes it's fair share of full throttle. It required a little lead on the tail to get the balance right but other than that I feel I have pleny of power, certainly for my standard of flight ! I can happily receommend the 4-max suggested setup and I'd also like to thank George over a 4-max.co.uk for all the help and patience he showed during my build. Thanks everyone for your help ! Jason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted September 3, 2016 Share Posted September 3, 2016 Top stuff Jason, just another note to add to the flight duration, I run telemetry on a lot of my electric models and it's interesting to note 1) Just how much the motor unloads and the current drops in level flight 2) At half throttle you'll find you are pulling less than half the static full throttle amps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.
× Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead
Only 75 emoji are allowed.
× Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead
× Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor
× You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.