buster prop Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 I went for Spektrum, still have my old DX7 and a fairly new DX6i which is DSMX for the new receivers. I'll stay with Spektrum because it's been reliable, my DSM2 and DSMX receiver collection, and to fly my BNF models. For my level of models and flying Spektrum does what I need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Fairgrieve Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Mainly Spektrum for me. I do however have an older Spektrum DX7 with the Frsky hack module in. I would like the Taranis, but have to much invested in my Spektrum gear. However a Spektrum DSMX module would clinch the deal for me. Kev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arne lyngstad Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Used Multiplex Evo pro 7 f?rst and noe 16 Pro. Telemetry awsome om this equipment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Privett Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Futaba for me - going back to my M6 series on 27MHz in the 1970s, via Challenger, FF6, FF8, FF7 (all on 35MHz), then on to 2.4GHz with a FF7, though with a few FrSky FASST-compatible receivers. It's probably time for a new tx soon, and I'm quite tempted by the Taranis... Otherwise maybe a 14SG - but at nearly 3 times the price! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclicscooby Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 I was Futaba (35Mhz) to the core... Then I got a Dx6i, specifically for a UMX BNF... Ive not grown to like the Dx6's.....Its cheap plastic, or the scroll wheel.... BUT... Its never glitched... Not ONCE...My 35Mhz setup was ever more glitchy, so i slowly moved over.. The FF7, a fantastic set, is gathering dust, and ive just ordered a Dx9.... Luv Chrisie.. xx Edited By Cyclicscooby on 15/04/2014 21:35:03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lindsay Todd Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Futaba since 1982 (not the same set though!) still got my old Futaba Gold TX best ever switch and trim locations on a TX. Linds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyB Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Posted by Bill_B on 15/04/2014 12:56:52: There is only one Radio for serious glider pilots, Multiplex. There WAS only one radio for serious glider pilots, then Mpx made a total mess of the Profi TX - very late, too expensive and barely any extra functionality over an Evo. Couple this with their silly RX prices and they are a dying breed; Jeti and FrSky seem to have sliced up most of their market share here in the UK. I still know a few people using 4000s and cockpits, but only one uses M-Link with the rest using FrSky modules or still on 35. I would have loved to stick with Mpx, but I am not sure they will be around making radio gear in the medium term so I've gone FrSky; instructions are rubbish (aren't they always), but OpenTX and the resilient RF link are both fabulous. Edited By MattyB on 15/04/2014 21:47:52 Edited By MattyB on 15/04/2014 21:49:49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Chambers Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Posted by Cyclicscooby on 15/04/2014 21:34:07: The FF7, a fantastic set, is gathering dust, and ive just ordered a Dx9.... Isn't the FF7 module based? If so, rip that 35MHz module out and stick a FrSky 2.4GHz module in! Si. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Privett Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 The original FF7 (1990s) was module-based. The modern "FF7" (actually a T7C or T7CP) in either 35 or 2.4 versions is not modular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Geezer Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 It's taken me ages to get the hang of programming my Mpx Cockpit SX - but definitely worth the effort. The Tx feels just right in the hand ( not something you can really claim about any other manufacturers' Tx ). Agreed - the cost of their Rx's is just too high, but not that far out of line when compared with Futaba, Graupner et al. I'll stick with my Mpx Cockpit thanks. You never know, HK-Orange might even produce compatible Rx's, then there'll be no reason to even contemplate joining the Speckie brigade if I ever break my Cockpit Sx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reg shaw Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 I use a Futaba 12FG and am very happy with it. I also use a Spektrum DX6i for my indoory stuff and am also very happy with that. Ian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stu knowles Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Multiplex Evo 9 & 12, some still on 35 but moving over to Fr Sky using a hack module in the back of the 12. If I were to buy a new TX it would be the Trananis without a doubt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Travis Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Futaba for the field but also have spektrum for indoor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Cotsford Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I really must put a hack module in my old Horizon 8, just to see peoples faces when I stroll up to the flightline carrying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reno Racer Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Like others i have a Spektrum DX6i (DSMX) for Parkzone BNF stuff ( MSRX, Inverza 280 and F4F Wildcat). For some reason (not bothered changing over) i also have my Raptor 30 on Speccy. However, I many fly larger IC, petrol and electrics on Futaba (T8J); never had a problem. I was considereding a switch to just one system and getting a Spektrum DX9, but the cost of getting new RXs for all my Futaba planes put me off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Littleton Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Dx8, dx6i and futaba t8j, happy but confused ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve-richards Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Iv stuck with futaba since 2006 no problem with it Every thing else looks a bit basic to me but never tryed anything else Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken anderson. Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 look's like futaba and speccy are still the preferred brands.. ken Anderson ne...1 ........ brands dept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erfolg Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 It would be most informative to be able to view the previous poll, so as to see the trend. What is not apparent is the current position with respect to sales in the last 12 months or what ever other period that could be viewed as informative. Although access to the previous poll would be nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggles' Elder Brother - Moderator Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Erf, you can view the previous poll - just follow the link in David's first post in this thread! BEB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 So Futaba and Multiplex have both lost 25% of their market share, Jeti and Hitec have doubled theirs. Seems like Taranis is hitting Futaba the hardest, market share has gone from 41% to 32% and they've slipped to 2nd place behind Spektrum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggles' Elder Brother - Moderator Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Oh Frank! I was saving that for later! BEB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erfolg Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 There is an indication that the immediate progress of Frsky, with just one model, is putting them on par with both Hitec and JR. Looking at some sales such as Graupner, Jeti and you wonder if world wide sales replicate the apparent UK market, if they have a future as manufacturers and if it is worthwhile for any UK retailer in selling them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Jenkins Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I started with Futaba (FF 6) and was very happy until I started a project that needed more than 6 channels. Naturally, I went for the FF9 but shock horror, 2 weeks later the 2.4 GHz storm was launched. After waiting and waiting and waiting for the Futaba 2.4 module, I gave up and went for the JR (Spectrum) DSM9 combo. I really loved the much easier programming on the JR compared with the FF9. The JR Rx was bullet proof but sadly the Spectrum 6 Ch and 5 Ch Rxs proved to have problems and cost me 2 aircraft, one being an expensive aerobatic aircraft. After that I stuck to JR Rxs until I decided to make the break and get the JR XG11. Now, the provision of a free 8 Ch Rx together with the 11 Ch Rx you get as standard was a bonus. Since then, I've sold my FF9 and Futaba Rxs, decided to keep the JR DSX9 Tx and Rx and am considering selling the Spectrum Rxs that I've bought. I've still got 2 mid size scale aircraft that are fitted with Spectrum Rxs so I'm considering my position there. The XG11 seems to tick all my boxes. So far, very reliable and very quick to connect unlike the 3.5 secs it takes the DSX9 using the Spectrum protocol to connect. A true frequency hopper, and a host of facilities that are darned useful such as Model Match and the ability to set a warning tone at any point on the throttle stick. Since I mostly fly electric F3A aircraft, having an audible prompt when I've reached my level flight power setting is such a boon. Having a pre-=set 4 aileron wing function was wonderful when setting up my biplane with four ailerons - all it needed was to select the 4 aileron wing and it was done! As far as I'm concerned, JR is the way to go - powerful but easy to use. One downside - it isn't the cheapest out there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Skilbeck Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Posted by Erfolg on 16/04/2014 22:18:50: Looking at some sales such as Graupner, Jeti and you wonder if world wide sales replicate the apparent UK market, if they have a future as manufacturers and if it is worthwhile for any UK retailer in selling them. Graupner have just been relaunched in the UK after being bought out of administration last year by SJ and have a new UK distributor, so like Hitec (Aurora 9) there market share may be on the up. Multiplex similarly are just introducing (at last) the Profi series and apparently have an upgraded Royal Pro series out later this year, so we will see. Jeti like Weatronic are a niche high end player, sort of like saying Ferrari don't sell as many cars as BMW, both Jeti and Multiplex offer a pretty comprehensive range of add on's to their systems e.g. neck straps, trays, alternative switches etc so although their market share isn't big their users are likely to spend additional money with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.