Jump to content

ARTF tail feathers - what glue do you use


Megawatt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Most ARTF instructions say you should use epoxy to fix the tailplane and fin to the fuselage - having removed the film to allow a wood to wood joint. I can't help but think it would be far easier and less messy to use PVA or aliphatic glue instead as we are constantly told that these glues produce a joint stronger than the surrounding wood. However I am very mindful of the tragic fatal accident some years ago where (I believe) a tailplane came adrift of a model and it was noted in the report that the wrong adhesive had been used. Now if I were ever to be in that horrible position I would at least like to think that the same report would say that the model was constructed in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. Does anyone know why they specify Epoxy (gap filling?) and what glue do you use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on the fit and the way it all goes together. A good cyano bond will be very strong but requires a very tight fit on the parts.

The last one i did was an acrowot xl and i used epoxy as it was a sloppy fit. I put masking tape on the edges of the joint, then used a syringe full of epoxy to make sure i got it into the gap. Some gentle wiggling and prodding got the glue well into the joint so its nice a strong now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 min epoxy and masking tape on the edges. Also meths will clean off epoxy from the covering nicely.

When glueing the tailplane I sit with it continuously checking it for square and level. You have only one chance to get it right !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On several models I've cut out a section of the rudder post using a razor saw so that I could slide the tailplane in from the rear rather than the side, then replaced the missing section. That way I could get a good coat of epoxy on all the surfaces to be joined and not all over the tail. IIRC I did both the Acrowot and WotsWot XLs that way. As Cymaz sais, masking tape to limit the spread of glue and a spirit clean-up.

On smaller models I've wicked CA in and not had a tail fall off - yet!. It does need a good fit though.

Re that accident - wasn't that the one where the covering film hadn't been removed before gluing the rudder in place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having previously used epoxy on several ARTF I have now changed to Super Aliphatic where there is a good fit. But I've also experimented with Gorilla glue where the fit wasn't that good and that was / is fine. The only issues I have with cyano is that it isn't waterproof (shouldn't be an issue!) and its not fuel (petrol) proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With ARTFs I think the problem can be how a strip of covering film can be removed from the tailplane for a good wood-to-wood joint. The edge of a covering iron turned up high, or a soldering iron to melt the covering have been suggested. A new No11 blade in your swan morton can still lightly score the wood beneath the covering, even when used with care. The slightest score across the tailplane can be a stress riser for a future failure. Instructions don't seem to point this out. What do others do?

I have always used 30min epoxy for gluing wooden tailplanes but cyano on foam seems reliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always used a blade to remove covering from tailplane/parts to be glued.

I have used epoxy, C.A., and Aliphatic to glue on tailplanes. Most recently aliphatic on the 120, as I didn't want to ruin the Chrome covering. sometimes C.A. can run and spoil things, and epoxy is just messy.

A tip with epoxy...........Once applied, if you heat it with a heat gun it will run and wick into joints, but will then go off quicker.

D.D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use 30 minute epoxy, you get a chance to adjust your work before the glue sets fully and with a quick wipe with meths, the joint cleans up nicely. Weight is minimal considering the little amount used and is really not an issue with anything other than a small model.

On the problem of cutting away covering on ARTFs without damaging the wood below, I've made a reasonable job by lightly scoring the cut line in the covering with a new and very sharp blade then carefully lifting the start of the scoreline and cut the covering against the blade as you go along over the scoreline again. If you can tape a flexible steel rule in position to cut against, that'll help. Needs care without rushing - horses for courses, naturally, but I couldn't imagine burning through the covering with a soldering iron (perhaps with a wire end?) would end up in anything other than tears!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe the glue type was the critical factor in the unfortunate accident (it wasn't an ARTF IIRC):

Mike Goldby, developments officer for the BMFA, told the inquest: "After the accident the radio equipment was found to be not working. The joints of the plane were very weak because the glue used to stick parts together had been put on after the parts were painted."

A friend was once asked to investigate a complaint to the BMFA of tailplane failure on an ARTF and found a very obvious score mark where the failure had occurred. I do wonder, given the fibrous nature of balsa, whether a very light score would affect the strength significantly - but it's best to avoid any damage of course. I have tended towards the lift and cut method as well but many ARTFs (and my own builds) come with a clear gluing area provided during covering. When I tried the soldering iron method, it did seem to mark the wood underneath so I reverted to my previous method.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by Doc Marten on 29/05/2019 10:55:10:

Weight in the tail may be minimal using epoxy but when you apply that minimal weight over an average sized fuselage with the CofG at 1/3rd, that force needs something like 22 times in the nose to balance it. Any weight saving in the tail is wise.

Edited By Doc Marten on 29/05/2019 11:03:35

While I'd agree that excess weight added to the tail is normally best avoided, I'm struggling to recall any models with a 22:1 ratio between the C of G position and tail/nose! It's normally something in the range between 3:1 and 4:1

Edited By Martin Harris on 29/05/2019 12:37:00

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cuban 8, even as a relative novice I can vouch for cutting off the covering with a small soldering iron. Done several now and the only mishap was using the sparkly new butane iron which caused collateral damage because of sideways heat spill. Straight edge essential; isn't necessary to go right through the film as the post technique described by you will achieve a clean cut without wandering or damaging the balsa.

The key is moving the iron at the right speed.

Always used 30 min epoxy, until the last/current project (possibly the last Acrowot in UK until Ripmax's alleged container arrives from Cathay) when aliphatic poured through the fin slot got lots of glue right into the stab joint with minimal overspill, then the fin was as tight as a tight thing and got fixed with super aliphatic. I believe strength is not the issue with clean balsa to balsa joints; weight could be. Wire rudder and elevator joiner still epoxied though.

Will find out if it works directly!

BTC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...