Jump to content

What's your favourite fuel proofer


Nigel R
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted by Barrie Lever on 24/11/2020 16:05:59:

That is often the case but Solarfilm Sales Ltd seem to be in OK financial shape and have been incorporated for over 10 years and submitted accounts in March this year.

Sure, I guess my thought was whether holding on to the machinery and larger building to house them would maintain any kind of profitability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all.

I 've come across this product while searching the web .

Anyone have experience of it .

Would you chemists out there have any views .

It's for automotive use and does not need to be mixed with a hardener and should be ok for petrol diesel and oils etc. not sure about our fuels though .

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/322296388960

MIPA C10 1K CLEAR COAT 1L LACQUER / HIGH GLOSS/ UV RESISTANT/ READY FOR USE/RFU | eBay

It is supplied by Luxon Trade Ltd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith,

I'm no chemist but there seems to be a recurring pattern with anything other than two pack; it may well hold back low nitro glow fuel if cleaned off promptly, but is unlikely to resist higher nitro exhaust for long. There's quite a selection of spray lacquers in Halfords (I only know because the primers are usually hiding from me) and I've only used a gloss lacquer for balancing wooden props.

If a single pack acrylic did work, it would be excellent; nobody on the thread has flagged it, as far as I recall; if you try it, let us know.

My latest (Anderson's Rocket .. think Stevenson's with fewer wheels .. ) will have Oracolour two pack over white Halfords primer, if it ever warms up enough to spray in the garage.

BTC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that notromethane is a very power solvent, it is used in cyno debonders which should tell you something about its properties. I have followed all the threads on fuel proofers and although some people claim there is a single part proofer that works, I have never found one that works 100%. Enamel paints given several months to harden can be used for low nitro fuels but anything above 5% needs a 2 part coat.

A.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oracover make two-part fuel proof matching colours and a clear one. You have to buy the matching hardener, of which there are two sorts, one for brushing and a hardener/thinner combined, which is for spraying. Either hardener is ok for all colours and of course you can use either hardener for the same paint if you need to spray part of the model and brush other parts.

I've used the red and it's fine, though fairly expensive.

You can get it from Sussex Model Centre though they often have to get it from the distributor.

Like Andy above I have never found a single part stuff to be 100% proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I recently received a pack of Rustins plastic coat. I mixed up a sample quantity and brushed it onto a metal can test-piece I sprayed with rattle can of metallic car spray. It is thinner than Sadolin and dries far more quickly to a hard high gloss. It self levels almost perfectly from brushing to look like a sprayed coat. Assuming the reports of its fuel proofness are justified it seems like the best substitute for the original Tufcote which was so good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/01/2021 at 14:25, Andy Stephenson said:

The problem is that notromethane is a very power solvent, it is used in cyno debonders which should tell you something about its properties. I have followed all the threads on fuel proofers and although some people claim there is a single part proofer that works, I have never found one that works 100%. Enamel paints given several months to harden can be used for low nitro fuels but anything above 5% needs a 2 part coat.

A.

Yes, I agree with your findings. Unless one has the equipment (and budget) to spray two pack epoxy finishes, as from what I've seen of friends' models they are fuel proof, then the next best thing is either an enamel finish or a protective coat of Polyurethane. Neither will be totally proof against glow fuels but their performance is greatly enhanced by allowing a longer period as is possible for the paint to cure rather than just to simply dry off. If you've ever tried to remove decades old oil paint from a  property and how it resists paint stripper you'll know what I mean. Obviously we don't have years or decades for our models' paint to cure solid, but get the finish on as soon as is possible and allow  as much time as you can for the paint to really harden whilst you're installing gear, setting up or whatever. A warm and well ventilated room or shed to store the model helps a lot with the curing process.

Keep the model clean and use a good detergent or degreaser (elbow grease spray is cheap and works well) to clean down thoroughly after every flight. Simply planning the exhaust routing to avoid residue build-up is useful as is avoiding spills when fueling.

With care, fuel resistant finishes are practical.

The Rustins product looks interesting, but looking at their advert is claimed to be 'resistant' to solvents rather than 'proof'. Worth a try.

Edited by Cuban8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Cuban8 said:

 

The Rustins product looks interesting, but looking at their advert is claimed to be 'resistant' to solvents rather than 'proof'. Worth a try.

I think the word "resistant" is used by manufacturers to cover themselves as someone will find something that strips it and then sue them. Think birds poo, that attacks anything . Well worth a try.

Even some two pack clear I have used has lifted if exhaust residue is left on it , so as you say a good clean is the way to go .

Another common weak spot is the edges of the laquer on say a cowling . If the solvent can get to the base coat it softens it and keeps creeping lifting the laquer as it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After letting my test-piece set for a day it looks like the adhesion onto the gloss paint coat is very good as the fingernail test proved. By comparison the same test with Sadolin PV67 gave disappointing results, it flaked off the paint easily even after several days. I think I'll use what I have left for treating the floor of my shed to use it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just done a test with the Rustins Plastic Coating and the application is not looking good. It is softening the red enamel paint and contaminating the brush. 

Previously I have used Ronseal polyurethane Ultra Tough Clear Satin Varnish but that succumbed to the fuel especially in the area of the exhaust.

Whether I can do an intermediate coat with the polyurethane and then use the Rustins ?? 

 

I have seen mentioned Polycrylic on another website.

https://www.minwax.com/wood-products/clear-protective-finishes/interior/minwax-polycrylic-protective-finish

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, John Wagg said:

Just done a test with the Rustins Plastic Coating and the application is not looking good. It is softening the red enamel paint and contaminating the brush. 

Previously I have used Ronseal polyurethane Ultra Tough Clear Satin Varnish but that succumbed to the fuel especially in the area of the exhaust.

Whether I can do an intermediate coat with the polyurethane and then use the Rustins ?? 

 

I have seen mentioned Polycrylic on another website.

https://www.minwax.com/wood-products/clear-protective-finishes/interior/minwax-polycrylic-protective-finish

 

 

John,

Rustins contains thinner that is not compatible with enamel paint. The rule is to put the "hottest" coat on first which means the one with the most powerful solvent. This is because you don't want subsequent coats to dissolve the ones on underneath. I have heard of hot coats sprayed over cooler ones but it has to be done very carefully by dusting on the first layers so the solvent almost dried by the time it hits the paint underneath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andy Stephenson said:

John,

Rustins contains thinner that is not compatible with enamel paint. The rule is to put the "hottest" coat on first which means the one with the most powerful solvent. This is because you don't want subsequent coats to dissolve the ones on underneath. I have heard of hot coats sprayed over cooler ones but it has to be done very carefully by dusting on the first layers so the solvent almost dried by the time it hits the paint underneath.

Tony H and Andy thanks for the replies.

The colour coat has been on a few days so I was disappointed when it bled through.  I have ordered a tin of the Guild Lane  that Tony H mentions so will test that. Tempted to try an intermediate polyurethane coat which I think should be O.K. with enamel.

But whether the Rustins will react with the polyurethane ??

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far I'm finding no problems with rustins as applied to bare wood. For mainly film finishes it seems a pretty decent choice.

 

Can't speak for compatibility with other paints, i am paint expert by any means. 

 

Andy what was the source of your rattle can spray?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...