Jump to content

Foam versus Built-Up Wings


Nigel Heather
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Nigel R said:

Very little in it.

 

Caveat that with "with good quality" for both of them. 

 

You could have really heavy wood for built up, or use loads of glue on a foam wing...

I agree, it may depend on the type and density of the foam, type of wood veneer ( obeche or balsa) glue type and finish (film, glass/epoxy or paint).

 

I have built a couple of models with brown paper/PVA covering reinforced with carbon fibre strips. Very strong, stiff and light but I don’t know how the weight would have compared with a fully built up structure. I would say the build time is comparable too. I think I will definitely build more wings like this in future. I like it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Nigel Heather said:

I’m looking at a Wot4 and considering whether to go Classic (kit with veneered foam wings) or ARTF which I assume has built up wings.

 

Can’t compare the weight because it doesn’t appear to be listed for the ARTF.

I have quite a lot of experience with WOT 4's and they are all good. Having built a couple of mk3 kits in recent years I would hesitate to recommend them now. Both had issues with the wing veneer splitting like crazy 🤪 I suspect a change in supplier or poor quality has crept in

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old foam wings used to be very heavy because of the glue used on the veneer. This is less of a problem these days. 

 

I like foam wings as they are quick to build, tough, and quite easy to repair. They are also good for deadening vibration and noise. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the foaming glues (gorilla) make all the difference there?

 

8 hours ago, Piers Bowlan said:

I would say the build time is comparable too.

 

With a regular sport model, I found the build time is less for a foam wing, by a few hours. If you're adding a lot of hardware (retracts, etc) that advantage diminishes a bit. These days I don't mind a few hours making wing ribs and cutting some spars.

 

Time aside, using foam wings gives a reasonable guarantee of accuracy, especially for novice builders. Can't overlook that.

 

Way back when, they were also a plus for kit manufacturers. Foam was cheap, veneer was cheap, having a pre-rolled wing made the kit "quick build", of course now ARTF is here nobody cares about "quick build".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can just sand the wood well with fine sandpaper and cover as normal, the finish may be not quite as good as balsa due the the more prominent grain. I did read an interesting article on glider wings regarding the efficiency of the wings with no sheeting, D box sheeting and a fully sheeted wing. The article found the fully sheeted wing to be more efficient as the covering maintained the profile of the wing and did not sag between the ribs. I wonder if this was found on the early Hurricanes that had a fabric wing that was later changed to fully skinned wing. Corsairs also had the same evolution.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...