Jump to content

Fokker D-VIII Peter Miller


Recommended Posts

Advert


There was an article by Frank Skilbeck in March 2023 (last year) on building an electric version.  If you buy the plan from Sarik then I think you also get a print-out of Peter's article from the January 2013 RCME.  I built one earlier this year - finished but not yet flown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Very good, thanks for replying, I'm translating from Spanish to English.
I bought a model from Sarikhobbies, Peter Miller's 54’ Fokker D-VIII, and it arrived last week. The instructions are rather scarce, rather non-existent. I'm a beginner and I like a challenge. 
There would be information on how to assemble the plane. Atten.Lopez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could ask any questions here on the forum if there are unexplained items.

 

This may not be the best model for a beginner.  The big problem with WW1 models is the very short nose - you will need to keep the model very light at the tail end to avoid putting a lot of lead in the nose.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kc said:

You could ask any questions here on the forum if there are unexplained items.

 

This may not be the best model for a beginner.  The big problem with WW1 models is the very short nose - you will need to keep the model very light at the tail end to avoid putting a lot of lead in the nose.  

 

I'd agree with that.  It took me numerous attempts to get the parasol wing supports right because the wing is in midair as it were.  Not having flown it yet I'm not sure even now I have it right 🙂  It wasn't too difficult to get the CoG right but mine's electric.

 

1134164129_Complete4.jpg.5dba844802eb1baf3d67dff2c1bc37d9.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Geoff S said:

There was an article by Frank Skilbeck in March 2023 (last year) on building an electric version. 

This article was in RCME and looks as though it would be very useful for anyone building this model for electric power.   Back issues of RCME are available from Mortons.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a pointer on wing mounting. Build the wing centre section and use that as a guide when you bend and fit the piano wire wing supports. I bought the CNC parts from Sarik as well as the drawing because I'm lazy.

 

20230412_234627.thumb.jpg.265546c088687a201c10323c56968309.jpg

 

I soldered brass P clips to the ends of the piano wire supports so that wing removal/fitting was easier and repeatable. That's much the hardest part of the build IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I built one, I'm yet to get a decent flight out of it. The parasol struts are a nightmare, and one knock on a wing tip rips them, and your undercarriage mounts out. Everything else just builds like a normal plan build. 

 

Mines in the queue for repairs, again, if it doesn't get a decent flight next season I'll take great pleasure in stripping it for parts and binning it. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hace 19 horas, Geoff S dijo:

En marzo de 2023 (el año pasado) Frank Skilbeck publicó un artículo sobre la construcción de una versión eléctrica. Si compras el plano de Sarik, creo que también recibirás una copia impresa del artículo de Peter de la revista RCME de enero de 2013. Construí uno a principios de este año, lo terminé pero aún no lo puse en vuelo.

Hello, I know her.
Good electrical characteristics with the plane. I have seen the proof on YouTube of
Frank Skilbeck, but the assembly instructions for the model are very deficient, specifically 4 sheets, if they had one that was a little more explicit.
Sincerely Lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lopez, any questions, just ask. Was flying mine just last week. The build is pretty easy, the only tricky bit is the parasol wing supports.

 

As for flying, mine flies quite well, it's just the takeoff and landings! Into wind and it's fine, any crosswind and using the rudder on mine causes it to throw a tizzy and flip over, it's fine once the wheels have left the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have read the DVIIi, like the Triplane, relied heavily on the rear fuselage for yaw stability as there is virtually no fixed fin area.

This is made worse by the extended nose on such RC models as the nose extension "eats into" the already limited directional stability.

 

I also note the prototype DVII had a "short" rear fuselage that at Fokkers insistence was extended secretly by the factory over night despite the fact the plane had been formally submitted to the fighter trials. The resulting control harmony was then considered ideal for a fighter by all the test pilots that flew it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...