Jump to content

Quadcopter idiot


cymaz
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, ken anderson. said:

but are there to make someone think twice about buying a radio controlled model of whatever description

Hi Ken,

 

A year or so ago a good, and largely law abiding friend of mine bough himself a drone. Until I told him about the need to register, he didn't have the first idea it was necessary. And again, here lies the same problem; those outside the law, will remain so... I do struggle with this legislation, although accept something ought be done. I'm not too sure if anyone made use of the great big long registration code on the side of the drone over the stadium...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello Graham...that's really part of the problems...people may be keen on having a go with a one but aren't made aware of the regs...so are ignorant of them...and when something happens...they assume that they are model flyers as we are......the regs are constantly get updated and it is hard to keep up....but as long as we have something we can refer to ...to keep ourselves right...i'm happy......i've been flying like many others for umteen years and try and do it with causing upset and offence to anyone....as the majority of abiding model flyers i imagine do..........., and I'm not about to turn feral...

 

ken anderson...ne...1...Feral dept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those intent on doing bad things will certainly not do anything which will aid in their prosecution.

Regrading the legislation being changed I think the only thing that will change will be the cost which will certainly be upward.

As for not knowing the regulations I would suggest the retailer has an obligation to point that out. Mind id it means loosing a sale...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Don Fry said:

Not quite right about flying only from registered sites in France. That applies to aircraft over 800g not fitted with an electronic here I am device. 

Maybe if I take the 4 motors off of my Quad, then it 'might' come down to 800 grams, but all my planes weigh over 3 kilos so even if I took the engine off it would be illegal over here, 

 

 As for the 'tracker' that's for a few clubs near model fields, I think there are around 8 of them, and flying 'Wild',,,

 

Ps you wait and see in England some more laws will arrive and the £9 tax will go up,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

Maybe if I take the 4 motors off of my Quad, then it 'might' come down to 800 grams, but all my planes weigh over 3 kilos so even if I took the engine off it would be illegal over here, 

 

 As for the 'tracker' that's for a few clubs near model fields, I think there are around 8 of them, and flying 'Wild',,,

 

Ps you wait and see in England some more laws will arrive and the £9 tax will go up,,,

About time you looked at the French regulations, I think you will be retaking them towards the end of the year.

Edited by Don Fry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ken anderson. said:

don't you think that the regs intoduced aren't to deter bona fide members of associations...who try to do what they have been told(most of the time)...... but are there to make someone think twice about buying a radio controlled model of whatever description .....bearing in mind all the stuff they need to do to fly lawfully? ...... instead of out of the box and fly....regardless.....and cause an accident/incident. 

 

as an aside,not long ago there was a theory that the regs were to clear the airways....and allow Drones to fly,here there and everywhere.......that seems to have gone quiet also......

 

i may be wrong of course.?

 

ken anderson...ne..1... regs dept. 

 

If you have read the various papers dating back to the Riga agreement of 2015 you can see that the primary goal of the legislation has never been increased safety - that is essentially a by-product. It is the integration of UAS into the airspace for economic gain that was always the primary goal - read the first 2 of the "Key issues" from output paper from that conference if you don't believe me...

  • Considers that the RPAS sector urgently requires European and global rules in order to ensure cross-border RPAS development; considers that a clear European legal framework is needed to ensure investment and development of a competitive European RPAS sector; underlines the fact that if no action is taken promptly, there is a risk that the economic potential and positive effects of RPAS will not be fully realised;

  • Recalls the economic importance of this sector, and underlines the need for suitable policies to protect privacy and ensure data protection, safety and security, which are proportionate to their aim while not imposing an unnecessary burden on SMEs;

...the safety of BVLOS flights is not addressed toil about the 5th bullet!

 

So why are the skies not black with delivery drones then? Well, we all know why (with curent tech it is not easy to do, certainly not over any decent range or in crowded urban environments), but of course that makes no difference - but because you have to have the legal frameworks in place before you can attempt the practicalities the  ministers will continue to be whispered to by the big industrial players, hence why we alreadyhave to register ourselves and take the online competency tests etc. Ultimately if our friendly ministers they think there are tax £££s and jobs to be had, they'll go after them to help secure their seats at the next election.

 

It's true that the BMFA and other national associations have managed to stave of the worst case scenario so far, and @Cuban8 is right that there seems little likelhood of BVLOS drone eliveries in even the medium term. However, that doesn't mean we are safe forever. For a start our Article 16 authorisations have to be reviewed and approved annually by the CAA, so if they were to go many, many clubs would struggle to operate legally. Paul de T's delivery style in this thread might be a little abrupt ;), but ultimately he is correct - it is highly likely that further legislation and more onerous requirements will be put forward in the coming years as that is the clear global trend. The most obvious of these are the remote ID requirements in France (which are live) and the US (which are going through a lengthy review process prior to the final legislation being agreed). If the US get that through do you really think the UK will rebuff the big US corporations lobbying for that to happen here? ~50-100k recreational model/UAS pilots is not a whole lot of voters, so I know where my money is...

 

 

Edited by MattyB
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, EarlyBird said:

So it's a fact not just an opinion? 

Why all the pessimism?

Is there no one on here with an optimistic outlook?

 

?

I think that aeromodellers are some of the most optimistic individuals around - hundreds if not thousands of pounds worth of equipment put into the air and the risk of losing the lot if something goes wrong - got to have an optimistic outlook! No, this is not about whinging, complaining and just being plain awkward, but questioning the validity of corralling affiliated model aircraft and drone flyers with an excellent safety record in with a new and publically available technology that unfortunately has given the authorities serious concerns (real or imagined) and resulting in the regs that we have now. Arguing that the regs need to be in place because of an expected army of commercial UAVs criss-crossing the skyways anytime soon is barmy. It's never going to amount to anywhere near a problem with our models/drones that'll need to be looked at for decades to come, if at all- so why the mad rush to legislate now?

I would like to see members of any  of the recognised model flying or drone flying bodies (e.g. BMFA/BDF or FPVUK etc) competely removed from the CAA system and traceability simply to be based on a flyer's association membership number. Why would my BMFA membership number not be sufficient?

I can see the advantage of being able to trace the owner of a lost model or whatever in the rare event of third party damage where our insurance would come into force and right any wrongs that had occurred to a member of the public.  I view that as a responsible and positive way forward that puts us in a good light. Many flyers have been putting their BMFA number on their models for years, so we've been ahead of the game.

My car registration number allows the police and insurance companies to trace my vehicle in the case of a problem, so what's wrong with simply putting your BMFA number on models without the duplication of a long CAA number and the extra expense?  The chances of a model needing to be traced because of something serious happening to it is highly unlikely and I'd be interested to know just how many  times the CAA database has been used so far to trace a lost machine.

 

Edited by Cuban8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ron Gray said:

EB, don't worry about it now, just take it in your stride when and if it does come.

Thanks Ron,

It just happens that that is what I do.

Too many moaners and groaners in the world, predicting the worst helps no one.

We need jollying along as minor obstacles are put in our way all working towards a common goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the efforts of the BMFA and the responses from individuals surprised the legislators and contributed to our relatively benign legislation.  Trying to take a realistic view is neither optimism nor pessimism but we need to watch out and react to any future threats to the viability of our hobby/sport (delete as appropriate). 

 

Enjoy what we have, dream about the old days and be wary of the future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come on what else can I do but moan,,,,

 

It's winter and cold, and looking back at my life ( sad so and so ), flying free on the Newcastle town moor, sharing a field in the middle of the town with

 people walking their dogs, some playing golf and cows,,,

 

Then over to France where I tasted real liberty,,, free parking no speed radars etc etc, I have ben flying all around the south of France with only a FFAM licence, ( French model federation )slop soaring, public demonstrations, French Helicopter championships, Pylon racing etc, but now there are so many laws, there are no public model meetings, only inter-club ones no Paella, no chatting to the public, and of course no buddy box flying with the youngsters,   the Covid pass was the last straw,,,,,

 

Still one good thing I found this forum to pass my time and yes it is a good one with plenty of exchanges,,

 

Ps yes thanks MHM reminiscing at the moment,,,

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EarlyBird said:

Thanks Ron,

It just happens that that is what I do.

Too many moaners and groaners in the world, predicting the worst helps no one.

We need jollying along as minor obstacles are put in our way all working towards a common goal.

A proper pessimist, is just someone who has had a reality check. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Paul De Tourtoulon said:

I did start manifesting at the very beginning, but the Police ( under Macrons orders ) got very violent even when they were peacefully walking through some towns

I gave up very quickly, anyway the French government don't act on what the 'people' think or do, 1789 changed the 'titles', but not the system,,,,?

Paul, very sorry, I can’t believe that any police force needs the orders of a small man to enforce a bit of order, without too many broken bits. 
 

Anyway, I’m signing off. I cooked a paella, clams, prawns, Queenies, braised and grilled duck thighs, and it drove the dog wild, and he tripped madam up, and now she has a broken nose. I have a photo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...